Polymerase exchange on single DNA molecules reveals processivity clamp control of translesion synthesis

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 21, 2014, Pages 7647-7652

  Kath, James E ^a   Jergic, Slobodan ^b   Heltzel, Justin M H ^c   Jacob, Deena T ^d   Dixon, Nicholas E ^b   Sutton, Mark D ^c   Walker, Graham C ^d   Loparo, Joseph J ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

DinB; DNA repair; DNA replication; Lesion bypass; Single molecule techniques

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE III;

ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRUCTURE; DNA SYNTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; UPREGULATION;

DINB; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; LESION BYPASS; SINGLE-MOLECULE TECHNIQUES;

DNA; DNA POLYMERASE BETA; DNA POLYMERASE III; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; MODELS, GENETIC; PROTEIN BINDING; SOS RESPONSE (GENETICS); STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84901660107     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321076111     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Sale JE, Lehmann AR, Woodgate R (2012) Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13(3):141-152.
2. Sutton MD (2010) Coordinating DNA polymerase traffic during high and low fidelity synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804(5):1167-1179.
3. Indiani C, McInerney P, Georgescu R, Goodman MF, O'Donnell M (2005) A sliding-clamp toolbelt binds high-and low-fidelity DNA polymerases simultaneously. Mol Cell 19(6):805-815. (Pubitemid 41316674)
4. Heltzel JM, Maul RW, Scouten Ponticelli SK, Sutton MD (2009) A model for DNA polymerase switching involving a single cleft and the rim of the sliding clamp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(31):12664-12669.
5. Zhuang Z, et al. (2008) Regulation of polymerase exchange between Pol eta and Pol delta by monoubiquitination of PCNA and the movement of DNA polymerase holo-enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(14):5361-5366. (Pubitemid 351753868)
6. Pagès V, Fuchs RP (2002) How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells? Oncogene 21(58):8957-8966. (Pubitemid 36110825)
7. Wijffels G, et al. (2004) Inhibition of protein interactions with the β2 sliding clamp of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III by peptides from β2-binding proteins. Biochemistry 43(19):5661-5671. (Pubitemid 38623600)
8. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S (2007) PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 129(4):665-679. (Pubitemid 46802385)
9. Ohmori H, et al. (2001) The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol Cell 8(1):7-8. (Pubitemid 32772900)
10. Jarosz DF, Godoy VG, Delaney JC, Essigmann JM, Walker GC (2006) A single amino acid governs enhanced activity of DinB DNA polymerases on damaged templates. Nature 439(7073):225-228. (Pubitemid 43083146)
11. McKenzie GJ, Lee PL, Lombardo MJ, Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM (2001) SOS mutator DNA polymerase IV functions in adaptive mutation and not adaptive amplification. Mol Cell 7(3):571-579. (Pubitemid 32706349)
12. Slechta ES, et al. (2003) Adaptive mutation: General mutagenesis is not a programmed response to stress but results from rare coamplification of dinB with lac. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(22):12847-12852. (Pubitemid 37339988)
13. Ponder RG, Fonville NC, Rosenberg SM (2005) A switch from high-fidelity to error-prone DNA double-strand break repair underlies stress-induced mutation. Mol Cell 19(6):791-804. (Pubitemid 41316673)
14. Pomerantz RT, Kurth I, Goodman MF, O'Donnell ME (2013) Preferential D-loop extension by a translesion DNA polymerase underlies error-prone recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(6):748-755.
15. Foti JJ, Devadoss B, Winkler JA, Collins JJ, Walker GC (2012) Oxidation of the guanine nucleotide pool underlies cell death by bactericidal antibiotics. Science 336(6079): 315-319.
16. Wagner J, Etienne H, Fuchs RP, Cordonnier A, Burnouf D (2009) Distinct β-clamp interactions govern the activities of the Y family PolIV DNA polymerase. Mol Microbiol 74(5):1143-1151.
17. Bunting KA, Roe SM, Pearl LH (2003) Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the β-clamp. EMBO J 22(21):5883-5892. (Pubitemid 37408825)
18. Jergic S, et al. (2013) A direct proofreader-clamp interaction stabilizes the Pol III replicase in the polymerization mode. EMBO J 32(9):1322-1333.
19. Toste Rêgo A, Holding AN, Kent H, Lamers MH (2013) Architecture of the Pol III-clamp-exonuclease complex reveals key roles of the exonuclease subunit in processive DNA synthesis and repair. EMBO J 32(9):1334-1343.
20. Wuite GJ, Smith SB, Young M, Keller D, Bustamante C (2000) Single-molecule studies of the effect of template tension on T7 DNA polymerase activity. Nature 404(6773): 103-106. (Pubitemid 30143142)
21. Maier B, Bensimon D, Croquette V (2000) Replication by a single DNA polymerase of a stretched single-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(22):12002-12007.
22. Tanner NA, et al. (2008) Single-molecule studies of fork dynamics in Escherichia coli DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15(2):170-176. (Pubitemid 351207517)
23. Wagner J, Fujii S, Gruz P, Nohmi T, Fuchs RP (2000) The β clamp targets DNA poly-merase IV to DNA and strongly increases its processivity. EMBO Rep 1(6):484-488.
24. Lamers MH, Georgescu RE, Lee S-G, O'Donnell M, Kuriyan J (2006) Crystal structure of the catalytic a subunit of E. coli replicative DNA polymerase III. Cell 126(5):881-892. (Pubitemid 44310779)
25. Ozawa K, et al. (2013) Proofreading exonuclease on a tether: The complex between the E. coli DNA polymerase III subunits a, epsilon, 8 and ß reveals a highly flexible arrangement of the proofreading domain. Nucleic Acids Res41(10):5354-5367.
26. Scouten Ponticelli SK, Duzen JM, Sutton MD (2009) Contributions of the individual hydrophobic clefts of the Escherichia coli ß sliding clamp to clamp loading, DNA replication and clamp recycling. Nucleic Acids Res 37(9):2796-2809.
27. Delaney JC, Essigmann JM (2006) Assays for determining lesion bypass efficiency and mutagenicity of site-specific DNA lesions in vivo. Methods Enzymol 408:1-15.
28. Tomer G, Reuven NB, Livneh Z (1998) The ß subunit sliding DNA clamp is responsible for unassisted mutagenic translesion replication by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(24):14106-14111. (Pubitemid 28549328)
29. Gon S, Napolitano R, Rocha W, Coulon S, Fuchs RP (2011) Increase in dNTP pool size during the DNA damage response plays a key role in spontaneous and induced-mu-tagenesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(48):19311-19316.
30. Ha T (2013) Single-molecule approaches embrace molecular cohorts. Cell 154(4): 723-726.
31. Yang J, Zhuang Z, Roccasecca RM, Trakselis MA, Benkovic SJ (2004) The dynamic processivity of the T4 DNA polymerase during replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(22):8289-8294. (Pubitemid 38736568)
32. Hamdan SM, et al. (2007) Dynamic DNA helicase-DNA polymerase interactions assure processive replication fork movement. Mol Cell 27(4):539-549. (Pubitemid 47238626)
33. Loparo JJ, Kulczyk AW, Richardson CC, van Oijen AM (2011) Simultaneous single-molecule measurements of phage T7 replisome composition and function reveal the mechanism of polymerase exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(9):3584-3589.
34. Graham JS, Johnson RC, Marko JF (2011) Concentration-dependent exchange accelerates turnover of proteins bound to double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 39(6): 2249-2259.
35. Indiani C, Langston LD, Yurieva O, Goodman MF, O'Donnell M (2009) Translesion DNA polymerases remodel the replisome and alter the speed of the replicative helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(15):6031-6038.
36. Uchida K, et al. (2008) Overproduction of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase DinB (Pol IV) inhibits replication fork progression and is lethal. Mol Microbiol 70(3):608-622.
37. Beuning PJ, Sawicka D, Barsky D, Walker GC (2006) Two processivity clamp interactions differentially alter the dual activities of UmuC. Mol Microbiol 59(2):460-474.
38. Downey CD, McHenry CS (2010) Chaperoning of a replicative polymerase onto a newly assembled DNA-bound sliding clamp by the clamp loader. Mol Cell 37(4): 481-491.
39. Chapados BR, et al. (2004) Structural basis for FEN-1 substrate specificity and PCNA-mediated activation in DNA replication and repair. Cell 116(1):39-50. (Pubitemid 38156182)
40. Tsutakawa SE, et al. (2011) Human flap endonuclease structures, DNA double-base flipping, and a unified understanding of the FEN1 superfamily. Cell 145(2):198-211.
41. Beattie TR, Bell SD (2012) Coordination of multiple enzyme activities by a single PCNA in archaeal Okazaki fragment maturation. EMBO J 31(6):1556-1567.
42. Freudenthal BD, Gakhar L, Ramaswamy S, Washington MT (2010) Structure of mon-oubiquitinated PCNA and implications for translesion synthesis and DNA polymerase exchange. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(4):479-484.
43. Tsutakawa SE, et al. (2011) Solution X-ray scattering combined with computational modeling reveals multiple conformations of covalently bound ubiquitin on PCNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(43):17672-17677.
44. Fu H, Le S, Chen H, Muniyappa K, Yan J (2013) Force and ATP hydrolysis dependent regulation of RecA nucleoprotein filament by single-stranded DNA binding protein. Nucleic Acids Res 41(2):924-932.
45. Tanner NA, van Oijen AM (2010) Visualizing DNA replication at the single-molecule level. Methods Enzymol 475:259-278.