Ipsilateral acoustic electric pitch matching: A case study of cochlear implantation in an up-sloping hearing loss with preserved hearing across multiple frequencies

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 161-165

  Prentiss, Sandra ^a   Staecker, Hinrich ^a   Wolford, Bob ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MED EL GmbH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Hearing preservation; Pitch matching; Stimulation rate

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; PITCH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 84901588509     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: 17547628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000066     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adamson C.L., Reid M.A., Davis R.L. 2002. Opposite actions of brain-serived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 on firing features and ion channel composition of murine spiral ganglion neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(4): 1385-1396.
2. Baumann U., Nobbe A. 2004. Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Hearing Research, 196(1-2): 49-57.
3. Baumann U., Nobbe A. 2006. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Hearing Research, 213: 34-42
4. Boex C.B., Cosendai L., Sigrist G., Kos A., Pilizzone M. 2006. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 7: 110-124.
5. Boyd P.J. 2011. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes. Ear and Hearing, 32(2): 1-17.
6. Bross I.D. 1952. Sequential medical plans. Biometrics, 8: 188-205
7. Carlyon R.P, Lynch C, Deeks J.M. 2010. Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 127(5): 2997-3008.
8. Dorman M., Spahr T., Gifford R., Loiselle L., McKay S., Holden T., et al. 2007. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear. Journal of Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8(2): 234-240.
9. Fu Q., Shannon R. 2002. Frequency mapping in cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 23: 339-348.
10. Krumbholz K., Patterson R.D., Pressnitzer D. 2000. The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 108: 1170-1180.
11. Machery O., Carlyon R.P. 2012. Place-pitch manipulations with cochlear implants. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 131(3): 2225-2236.
12. Otte J., Chile S., Schuknech H. 1978. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantations. Laryngoscope, 88: 1231-1246.
13. Reiss LA., Gantz B.J. 2008. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otology and Neurotology, 29(2): 160-167.
14. Stakhovskaya O., Sridhar D., Bonham B., Leake P. 2007. Frequency map for human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8: 220-233.
15. Townshend B., Cotter N, Van Compernolle D., White R.L. 1987. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 82: 106-115.
16. Vermeire K., Nobbe A., Schleich P., Nopp P., Voormolen M.H., Van de Heyning PH. 2008. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Hearing Research, 245(1-2): 98-106.
17. Zeng F 2002. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hearing Research, 174: 101-106.