An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 234-240

  Dorman, Michael F ^a   Spahr, Tony ^a   Gifford, Rene ^a   Loiselle, Louise ^a   McKarns, Sharon ^a   Holden, Timothy ^b   Skinner, Margaret ^b   Finley, Charles ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

3D image reconstruction; CT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL BONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; HEARING; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 34247540945     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0071-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BOËX C, BAUD L, COSENDAI G, SIGRIST A, KOS M-I, PELIZZONE M. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 7(2):110-124, 2006.
2. BLAMEY O, DOOLEY G, PARISI E, CLARK G. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear. Res. 99:139-150, 1996.
3. CHING T, INCERTI P, HILL M. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear. 25:9-21, 2004.
4. DORMAN MF, KETTEN D. Adaptation by a cochlear-implant patient to upward shifts in the frequency representation of speech. Ear Hear. 24:457-460, 2003.
5. DORMAN MF, LOIZOU P, RAINEY D. Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102(5):2993-2996, 1997.
6. EDDINGTON D, DOBELLE W, BRACKMANN, D, MLADEJOVSKY M, PARKIN J. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 87(6, part 2, Suppl. 53):1-39, 1978.
7. FU Q-J, SHANNON R. Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 20(4):332-344, 1999a.
8. FU Q-J, SHANNON R. Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(3):1889-1900, 1999b.
9. FU Q-J, SHANNON R, GALVIN J. Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112(4):1664-1674, 2002.
10. GANTZ B, TURNER C, GFELLER K, LOWDER M. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 115:796-802, 2005.
11. GREENWOOD D. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87(6):2592-2605, 1990.
12. JAMES C, BLAMEY P, SHALLOP L, INCERTI P, NICHOLAS A. Contralateral masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 6:87-97, 2001.
13. KAWANO A, SELDON H, CLARK G. Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the lengths of organ of Corti, outer wall, inner wall and Rosenthal's canal. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 105:701-709, 1996.
14. KIEFER J, POK M, ADUNKA O, STURZEBECHER E, BAUMGARTNER W, SCHMIDT M, TILLEIN J, YE Q, GSTOETTNER W. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 10(3):134-144, 2005.
15. KONG Y-L, STICKNEY G, ZENG F-G. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(3):1351-1361, 2005.
16. ROBB R. The biomedical imaging resource at Mayo Clinic. IEEE Medical Imaging 20:854-867, 2001.
17. ROSEN S, FAULKNER A, WILKINSON L. Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(6):3629-3636, 1999.
18. SKINNER M, HOLDEN L, HOLDEN T. Effect of frequency boundary assignment on speech recognition with the SPEAK speech-coding strategy. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryng. Suppl 166:307-311, 1995.
19. SPAHR A, DORMAN M. Performance of patients fit with Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Arch. Oto. - Head Neck Sur. 130(5):624-628, 2004.
20. SRIDHAR D, STAKHOVSKAYA O, LEAKE PA. A frequency-position map for the human spiral ganglion. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 11(Suppl 1):16-20, 2006.
21. V. ILBERG C, KIEFER J, TILLEIN J, PFENNINGDORFF T, HARTMANN R, STURZEBECKER E, KLINKE R. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL 61:334-340, 1999.
22. VOIE AH, BURNS DH, SPELMAN FA. Orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning: three dimensional imaging of macroscopic biological specimens. J Microsc 170:229-236, 1993.