Place-pitch manipulations with cochlear implants

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 131, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 2225-2236

  MacHerey, Olivier ^a   Carlyon, Robert P ^a  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY-NERVE FIBERS; BI-POLAR MODE; CLINICAL SETTINGS; COCHLEAR IMPLANT LISTENERS; IMPLANTED ELECTRODES; INSERTION DEPTH; MONOPOLAR; TEMPORAL CUES;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES;

EXPERIMENTS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HEARING; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMETRICS;

EID: 84858960147     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3677260     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Başkent, D., and Shannon, R. V. (2005). Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1405-1416. 10.1121/1.1856273 (Pubitemid 40358009)
2. Baumann, U., and Nobbe, A. (2006). The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function., Hear. Res. 213, 34-42. 10.1016/j.heares.2005.12.010 (Pubitemid 43356626)
3. Bonham, B. H., and Litvak, L. M. (2008). Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics., Hear. Res. 242, 141-153. 10.1016/j.heares.2008.03.006
4. Buechner, A., Brendel, M., Krüeger, B., Frohne-Büchner, C., Nogueira, W., Edler, B., and Lenarz, T. (2008). Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies., Otol. Neurotol. 29, 203-207 (2008). 10.1097/mao.0b013e318163746 (Pubitemid 351170475)
5. Carlyon, R. P., Macherey, O., Frijns, J. H., Axon, P. R., Kalkman, R. K., Boyle, P., Baguley, D. M., Briggs, J., Deeks, J. M., Briaire, J. J., Barreau, X., and Dauman, R. (2010). Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11, 625-640. 10.1007/s10162-010-0222-7
6. Donaldson, G. S., Dawson, P. K., and Borden, L. Z. (2011). Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity 120 speech processing strategies: Speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity., Ear. Hear. 32, 238-250. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fb8390
7. Donaldson, G. S., Kreft, H. A., and Litvak, L. (2005). Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 623-626. 10.1121/1.1937362 (Pubitemid 41129200)
8. Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C., and Rainey, D. (1997). Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2993-2996. 10.1121/1.420354 (Pubitemid 27486277)
9. Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., and Stanton, D. (2003). Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1073-1080. 10.1121/1.1536928 (Pubitemid 36240733)
10. Finley, C. C., Holden, T. A., Holden, L. K., Whiting, B. R., Chole, R. A., Neely, G. J., Hullar, T. E., and Skinner, M. W. (2008). Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes., Otol. Neurotol. 29, 920-928. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318184f492
11. Firszt, J. B., Holden, L. K., Reeder, R. M., and Skinner, M. W. (2009). Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing., Otol. Neurotol. 30, 146-152. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181924ff8
12. Fu, Q. J., and Shannon, R. V. (1999). Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1889-1900. 10.1121/1.426725 (Pubitemid 29115838)
13. Fu, Q. J., Shannon, R. V., and Galvin, J. J., III (2002). Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode asignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1664-1674. 10.1121/1.1502901
14. Gani, M., Valentini, G., Sigrist, A., Ks, M. I., and Box, C. (2007). Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8, 69-83. 10.1007/s10162-006-0065-4 (Pubitemid 46214121)
15. Kong, Y. Y., and Carlyon, R. P. (2010). Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 3114-3123. 10.1121/1.3372713
16. Krumbholz, K., Patterson, R. D., and Pressnitzer, D. (2000). The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1170-1180. 10.1121/1.1287843
17. Landsberger, D. M., and Srinivasan, A. G. (2009). Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients., Hear. Res. 254, 34-41. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.007
18. Laneau, J., Boets, B., Moonen, M., van Wieringen, A., and Wouters, J. (2005). A flexible auditory research platform using acoustic or electric stimuli for adults and young children., J. Neurosci. Methods 142, 131-136. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.08.015 (Pubitemid 40138037)
19. Long, C. J., Nimmo-Smith, I., Baguley, D. M., O'Driscoll, M., Ramsden, R., Otto, S. R., Axon, P. R., and Carlyon, R. P. (2005). Optimizing the clinical fit of auditory brain stem implants., Ear. Hear. 26, 251-262. 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00002 (Pubitemid 40917423)
20. Macherey, O., and Carlyon, R. P. (2010). Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 339-349. 10.1121/1.3269042
21. Macherey, O., Carlyon, R. P., van Wieringen, A., Deeks, J. M., and Wouters, J. (2008). Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9, 241-251. 10.1007/s10162-008-0112-4
22. Macherey, O., Deeks, J. M., and Carlyon, R. P. (2011). Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 12, 233-251. 10.1007/s10162-010-0248-x
23. Macherey, O., van Wieringen, A., Carlyon, R. P., Deeks, J. M., and Wouters, J. (2006). Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: Effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 7, 253-266. 10.1007/s10162-006-0040-0 (Pubitemid 44214664)
24. McDermott, H., Sucher, C., and Simpson, A. (2009). Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons., Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 14, 2-7. 10.1159/000206489
25. McDermott, H. J., and McKay, C. M. (1994). Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 155-162. 10.1121/1.410475 (Pubitemid 24209111)
26. McKay, C. M., and McDermott, H. J. (1999). The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 998-1009. 10.1121/1.428052 (Pubitemid 29379527)
27. Moon, A. K., Zwolan, T. A., and Pfingst, B. E. (1993). Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea., Hear. Res. 67, 166-178. 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90244-U (Pubitemid 23209834)
28. Rattay, F. (1989). Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36, 676-682. 10.1109/10.32099 (Pubitemid 19172389)
29. Rattay, F., Leao, R. N., and Felix, H. (2001). A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contributions of neural substructures on the generation and propagation of spikes., Hear. Res. 153, 43-63. 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00256-2 (Pubitemid 32153844)
30. Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., and Wilkinson, L. (1999). Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 3629-3636. 10.1121/1.428215 (Pubitemid 129520726)
31. Saoji, A. A., and Litvak, L. M. (2010). Use of phantom electrode' technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant., Ear. Hear. 31, 693-701.
32. Shannon, R. V. (1985). Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants., Hear. Res. 18, 135-143. 10.1016/0378-5955(85) 90005-X (Pubitemid 15003787)
33. Skinner, M. W., Holden, T. A., Whiting, B. R., Voie, A. H., Brundsen, B., Neely, J. G., Saxon, E. A., Hullar, T. E., and Finley, C. C. (2007). In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea., Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 197, 2-24.
34. Srinivasan, A. G., Landsberger, D. M., and Shannon, R. V. (2010). Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation., Hear. Res. 270, 89-100. 10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.004
35. Tong, Y. C., Blamey, P. J., Dowell, R. C., and Clark, G. M. (1983). Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 73-80. 10.1121/1.389620 (Pubitemid 13574106)
36. Undurraga, J. A., Carlyon, R. P., Wouters, J., and van Wieringen, A. (2011). Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses to different pulse shapes., in Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Pacific Grove, CA, (24-29 July 2011).
37. Undurraga, J. A., van Wieringen, A., Carlyon, R. P., Macherey, O., and Wouters, J. (2010). Polarity effects on neural responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve at different cochlear sites., Hear. Res. 269, 146-161. 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.017
38. van Hoesel, R. J., and Tyler, R. S. (2003). Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1617-1630. 10.1121/1.1539520 (Pubitemid 36297965)
39. van Wieringen, A., Carlyon, R. P., Laneau, J., and Wouters, J. (2005). Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear., Hear. Res. 200, 73-86. 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.006
40. Vermeire, K., Nobbe, A., Schleich, P., Nopp, P., Voormolen, M. H., and Van de Heyning, P. H. (2008). Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus., Hear. Res. 245, 98-106. 10.1016/j.heares.2008.09.003
41. Wilson, B. S., Lawson, D. T., Zerbi, M., and Finley, C. C. (1992). Speech processors for auditory prostheses: Virtual channel interleaved sampling (VCIS) processors-Initial studies with subject SR2., First Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Project No. N01-DC-2-2401 (Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
42. Zeng, F. G., Galvin, J. J. III, and Zhang, C. (1998). Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve., NeuroReport 9, 1845-1848. 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00033 (Pubitemid 28289197)