End-user quality of experience-aware personalized e-learning

Evolutionary Concepts in End User Productivity and Performance: Applications for Organizational Progress

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 281-301

  Muntean, Cristina Hava ^a   Muntean, Gabriel Miro ^b  

^a NATIONAL COLLEGE OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901533769     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-136-0.ch018     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. AHA! (2006). Retrieved from http://aha.win.tue.nl
2. Apostolopoulos, T. K. & Kefala, A. (2003). A configurable middleware architecture for deploying e-learning services over diverse communication networks. IASTED CATE International Conference. Rhodes, Greece.
3. Beaumont, I. (1994). User modeling in the Interactive Anatomy Tutoring System ANATOM-TUTOR. User Models and User Adapted Interaction Journal, 4(1), 21-45.
4. Bhatti, N., Bouch, A., & Kuchinsky, A. (2000). Integrating user-perceived quality into Web server design. Computer Networks Journal, 33(1-6), 1-16.
5. Bouch, A., Kuchinsky, A., & Bhatti, N. (2000). Quality is in the eye of the beholder: meeting users' requirements for Internet quality of service. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 297-304). Hague, The Netherlands.
6. Boyle, C. & Encarnacion, A. O. (1994). MetaDoc: An adaptive hypertext reading system. User Models and User Adapted Interaction Journal, 4(1), 1-19.
7. Brady, A., Conlan, O., & Wade V. (2004). Dynamic composition and personalization of pda-based e-learning-personalized mlearning. E-Learn'04 Conference (pp. 234-242). Washington, USA.
8. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling And User-adapted Interaction Journal, Special Issue: Adaptive Hypertext & Hypermedia, 6(2-3), 87-129.
9. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., & Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. Intelligent tutoring systems, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, (LNCS 1086, pp. 261-269).
10. Brusilovsky, P., (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Journal, 11(1-2), 87-110.
11. Brusilovsky, P., Karagiannidis, C., & Sampson, D. (2001). The benefits of layered evaluation of adaptive applications and services. International Conference on User Modeling, Workshop on Empirical Evaluations of Adaptive Systems (pp. 1-8). Sonthofen, Germany.
12. Chou, L.D. Wu, C.H. Lee, S.P. (2004). Position-aware multimedia mobile learning systems in museums. Web-Based Education Conference (pp. 416-229). Innsbruck, Austria.
13. Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K., & Druzdzel, M. (1997). On-line student modeling for coached problem solving using Bayesian networks. International Conference on User Modeling (UM97) (pp. 231-242). Chia Laguna, Italy.
14. Conlan, O. & Wade, V. (2004). Evaluation of APeLS-an adaptive e-learning service based on the multi-model, metadata-driven approach. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia & Adaptive Web-based Systems (AH2004) (pp. 291-295). Eindhoven, Netherlands.
15. Cristea, A. I. & de Mooij, A. (2003). LAOS: Layered WWW AHS authoring model and their corresponding algebraic operators. International World Wide Web Conference (WWW'03), Alternate Track on Education, Budapest, Hungary.
16. De Bra, P. & Calvi, L. (1998). AHA: A generic adaptive hypermedia system. ACM HYPER TEXT'98 Conference, Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 5-12). Pittsburgh, USA.
17. De Bra, P., Houben, G., & Wu, H. (1999). AHAM: A Dexter-based reference model for adaptive hypermedia. ACM HYPERTEXT'99 Conference (pp. 147-156). Germany.
18. Elissavet, G. & Economides, A. A., (2003). An evaluation instrument for hypermedia courseware. Journal of International Forum of Educational Technology & Society and IEEE Learning Technology Task Force, 6(2), 31-44.
19. Empirix (2003). Assuring QoE on next generation networks. White Paper, Retrieved from http://www.empirix.com/Empirix/Corporate/re-sources/resources+white+papers.html
20. Grigoriadou, M., Papanikolaou, K., Kornilakis, H., & Magoulas, G. (2001). INSPIRE: An intelligent system for personalized instruction in a remote environment. Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia Workshop. Sonthofen, Germany.
21. Heines, J. M. (2000). Evaluating the effect of a course Web site on student performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(1), 57-83.
22. IEEE 802.11 (1999). Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) & Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE standard 802.11.
23. IEEE 802.16 (2004). Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems, IEEE standard 802.16.
24. Jacobs, L. C. & Chase, C. I., (Eds.). (1992). Developing and using tests effectively: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Karagiannidis, C., Sampson, D., & Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Layered evaluation of adaptive and personalized educational applications and services. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Workshop on Assessment Methods in Web-based Learning Environments and Adaptive Hypermedia (pp. 21-29). San Antonio, TX.
26. Kay, J. & Kummerfeld, R. J. (1994). An Individualised course for the C programming language. International World Wide Web Conference. Chicago.
27. Muntean, C. H. & McManis, J. (2006a). Fine grained content-based adaptation mechanism for providing high end-user quality of experience with adaptive hypermedia systems. W3C International World Wide Web Conference (WWW'06), Hypermedia and Multimedia Track (pp. 53-62). Edinburgh, UK. New York: ACM Press.
28. Muntean, C. H. & McManis, J. (2006b). The value of QoE-based adaptation approach in educational hypermedia: Empirical evaluation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (LNCS 4018, pp.121-130).
29. Muntean, C. H. & McManis, J. (2006c). End-user quality of experience oriented adaptive e-learning system. Journal of Digital Information, Special Issue on Adaptive Hypermedia, 7(1). Retrieved from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/issue/view/29
30. Muntean, C. H., McManis, J., & Muntean, G.-M. (2006). Improving the performance of content delivery in Web-based information systems.China-Ireland International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (pp. 430-435). Hangzhou, China.
31. Murphy, M. & McTear, M. (1997). Learner modeling for intelligent CALL. In Jameson A., Paris C. & Tasso C. (Eds.) International Conference on User Modeling (UM97) (pp. 301-312). Wien Austria: Springer-Verlag.
32. Nejdl, W. & Wolpers, M. (1999). KBS hyper-book-a data-driven information system on the Web. W3C International World Wide Web Conference (WWW99). Canada.
33. Ng, M. H., Hall, W., Maier, P., & Armstrong, R. (2002). The application and evaluation of adaptive hypermedia techniques in Web-based medical education. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 10(3), 19-40.
34. Nielsen J. (Ed.). (1994). Heuristic evaluation. Usability inspection methods. New York: Wiley.
35. O'Keeffe, I., Brady, A., Conlan, O., & Wade, V. (2006). Just-in-time generation of pedagogically sound, context sensitive personalized learning experiences. International Journal on E-Learning (IJeL), Special Issue: Learning Objects in Context, 5(1), 113-127.
36. Papanikolaou K. A., Grigoriadou M., Kornilakis H., & Magoulas G. D. (2003). Personalizing the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: The case of INSPIRE. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Journal, 13(3), 213-267.
37. Pilar da Silva, D., Van Durm, R., Duval, E., & Olivié, H. (1998). Concepts and Documents for Adaptive Educational Hypermedia: A Model and a Prototype. ACM HYPERTEXT'98 Conference, Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 35-43). Pittsburgh, USA.
38. Preece, J. (Ed.). (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: John Willey & Sons.
39. Ramsay, J., Barbasi, A., & Preece, J. (1998). A psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the World Wide Web. Interacting with Computers Journal. Elsevier Publishing House.
40. Servidge, P. (1999). How long is too long to wait for a Web site to load? Usability News.
41. Sevcik, P. J. (2002). Understanding how users view application performance. Business Communications Review, 32(7), 8-9.
42. Smyth, B. & Cotter, P. (2002). Personalized adaptive navigation for mobile portals. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 608-612). Lyon, France.
43. Specht, M., Kravcik, M., Klemke, R., Pesin, L., & Huttenhain, R. (2002). Adaptive learning environment in WINDS. ED-MEDIA'02 (pp. 1846-1851), Denver, CO: AACE Press.
44. Triantafillou, E. Pomportsis, A. & Georgiadou, E. (2002). AESCS: adaptive educational system base on cognitive styles. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web Based Systems (AH'2002), Workshop on Adaptive Systems for Web-Based Education (pp. 10-20). Malaga, Spain.
45. Weber, G. & Möllenberg, A. (1995). ELM-Programming-Environment: A tutoring system for LISP beginners, cognition and computer programming. In Wender, K. F., Schmalhofer F. & Böcker, H. D. (Eds.) Cognition and Computer Programming (pp. 373-408). Toronto: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
46. Weber, G., Specht, M. (1997). User modelling and adaptive navigation supporting WWW-based tutoring systems. International Conference on User Modeling (UM'97) (pp. 289-300). Sardinia, Italy.
47. Weber, G. (1999). Adaptive learning systems in the World Wide Web. International Conference on User Modeling (UM'99) (pp. 371-378). Banff, Canada.
48. Weber, G., Kuhl, H. C., & Weibelzahl, S. (2001). Developing adaptive internet based courses with the authoring system NetCoach. Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 35-48). Sonthofen, Germany.
49. Weibelzahl, S. & Weber, G. (2002). Advantages, opportunities, and limits of empirical evaluations: Evaluating adaptive systems. Künstliche Intelligenz Journal, 3, 17-20.