An evaluation instrument for hypermedia courseware

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 31-44

  Elissavet, Georgiadou ^a   Economides, Anastasios A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Evaluation criteria; Evaluation instrument; Hypermedia courseware

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042682387     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. ANSI Standards Committee on Dental Informatics - Working Group Educational Software Systems (2002). Guidelines for the design of educational software, http://www.temple.edu/dentistry/di/edswstd/.
2. ARIADNE: Alliance of Remote Instructional Authoring and Distribution Networks for Europe, http://www.ariadne-eu.org/.
3. Beaudin, B. P., & Quick, D. (2002). Instructional Video Evaluation Instrument. Extension Journal, http://www.joe.org/joe/1996june/a1.html.
4. Becker, H. J. (1992). Computer education. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.) Encyclopedia of educational research, New York: Macmillan.
5. Biner, P. (2002). Web Course Evaluation Questionnaire, http://www.distance-educator.com/dnews/.
6. Britain, S., & Liber, O. (1999) A Framework for Pedagogical Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environments. Report 41, October, University of Wales: JISC Technology Application Programme.
7. CEN/ISSS The European Committee for Standardization: Information Society Standardization System, http://www.cenorm.be/isss/Workshop/lt/.
8. Children's Internet Site Evaluation Instrument (1988). Children's Software Review, January/February, http://www.childrenssoftware.com/contact.html.
9. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will Never Influence Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42 (2), 21-29.
10. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media. Review of Educational Research , 53 (4), 445-459.
11. Clarke, A. (1992). The Principles of Screen Design for Computer Based Learning Materials. U.K.: Department of Employment.
12. Cox, K., & Walker, D. (1993). User Interface Design (2nd Ed.), New York London: Prentice Hall.
13. Crawley, R. M. (2002). Evaluating CSCL - Theorists' & Users' Perspectives, University of Brighton: Collaborative Computing Research Group, http://www.bton.ac.uk/cscl/jtap/paper1.htm.
14. Flagg, B. (1990). Formative Evaluation for Educational Technologies, Hilsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager W. W. (1988). Principles of Instructional Design, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
16. Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. (2000). Evaluation Factors of Educational Software. In Kinshuk, Chris Jesshope & Toshio Okamoto (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies Proceedings, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 113-116.
17. Gray, S. H. (1989). The effect of locus of control and sequence control on computerised information retrieval and retention. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5 (4), 459-471.
18. IMS Global Learning Consortium, http://www.imsproject.org/.
19. ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36, http://jtc1sc36.org/.
20. Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Designing Hypertext for Learning. In Scanlon, E., & O'Shea, T. (Eds.) New Directions in Educational Technology, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 123-130.
21. Jonassen, D. H., Hannum, W. H. (1987). Research-based Principles for Designing Computer Software. Educational Technology, 1 (18), 42-51.
22. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with Media. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 179-211.
23. Kulik, C-L., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: an updated analysis. Computers and Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
24. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C-L. (1987). Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 222-30.
25. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-Analysis of Findings. Review of Educational Research. 50 (4), 525-544.
26. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking University Teaching, London: Routledge.
27. Liao, Y. C. (1997). Effects of Hypermedia vs. Traditional Instruction on Student Performance: A Meta-Analysis. CD-ROM Proceedings of WebNet97 World Conference on the WWW, Internet, and Intranet. Norfolk VA, USA: AACE, 312-317.
28. Litchfield, B. (1993). Design Factors in Multimedia Environments: Research Findings and Implications for Instructional Design. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1-10.
29. Locatis, C., Letourneau, G., & Banvard, R. (1989). Hypermedia and Instruction, Educational Technology Research and Development, 37 (4), 65-77.
30. Marchionini, G. (1990). Evaluating Hypermedia Based Learning. In Jonassen D., & Mandl H. (Eds.) Designing Hypermedia for Learning, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 355-374.
31. Mcateer, E., & Shaw, R. (1995). The Design of Multimedia Learning Programs, University of Glasgow: EMASHE Group.
32. Morris, J. M., Owen G. S., & Fraser, M. D. (1994). Practical Issues in Multimedia User Interface Design for Computer-Based Instruction. In Resman, S. (Ed.) Multimedia Computing: Preparing for the 21st Century, London: Idea Group Publishing, 225-284.
33. Nielsen, J. (1990). Evaluating Hypertext Usability. In Jonassen, D., & Mandl, H. (Eds.) Designing Hypermedia for Learning, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 147-168.
34. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM, 33 (3), 338-348.
35. Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. L. (Eds.) Usability Inspection Methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 25-64.
36. Orr, K. L, Golas, K. C., & Yao, K. (1994.) Storyboard Development for Interactive Multimedia Training. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, Winter, 18-31.
37. Poncelet, G. M., & Proctor, L. F. (1993). Design and Development Factors in the Production of Hypermediabased Courseware, Canadian Journal of Educational Computing, 22 (2), 91-111.
38. Powell, G. C. (1993). Incorporating learner cultural diversity into instructional systems design: An investigation of faculty awareness and teaching practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia.
39. Preece, J. (1993). Hypermedia, Multimedia and Human Factors. In Latchem, C., Williamson, J., & Henderson-Lancett, L. (Eds.) Interactive Multimedia, London: Kogan Page, 135-149.
40. Reeves, T. C. (1992). Effective dimensions of interactive learning systems. Invited keynote paper presented at the Information Technology for Training and Education Conference (ITTE '92), Queensland, Australia.
41. st Century, Harrisburg, London: Idea Group Publishing, 472-505.
42. Reigeluth, C. M. (1987). Instructional Theories in Action, Hilsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1989). In Search of a Happy Medium in Instructional Technology Research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37 (1), 19-33.
44. Schimmel, B. J. (1988). Providing Meaningful Feedback in Courseware. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.) Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware, Hilsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 183-196.
45. Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
46. Shneiderman, B., & Kearsley, G. (1989) Hypertext hands on! Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
47. Southern Regional Educational Board (2002). Criteria for evaluating Computer Courseware, http://www.sret.sreb.org/criteria/courseware.asp.
48. Tessmer, M., Jonassen, D., & Caverly, D. A. (1989). Nonprogrammers Guide to Designing for Microcomputers, Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited Inc.