The influence of visual and temporal dynamics on split attention: Evidences from eye tracking

Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 89-107

  Schmidt Weigand, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901526144     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-158-2.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631-682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
3. Brünken, R., & Leutner, D. (2001). Aufmerksamkeitsverteilung oder Aufmerksamkeitsfokussierung? Empirische Ergebnisse zur "Split-Attention-Hypothese" beim Lernen mit Multimedia. [Split attention or focusing of attention? Empirical results on the split-attention hypothesis in mul timedia learning.]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 29, 357-366.
4. Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53-61.
5. Carroll, P. J., Young, R. J., & Guertin, M. S. (1992). Visual analysis of cartoons: A view from the far side. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 444-461). New York: Springer.
6. Ciernak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007, August). Eye movements of differently knowledgeable learners during learning with split-source of integrated format. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the European Association of Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Budapest, Hungary.
7. Danemann, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
8. D'Ydewalle, G., & Gielen, I. (1992). Attention allocation with overlapping sound, image, and text. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. (pp. 415-427). New York: Springer.
9. D'Ydewalle, G., Praet, C., Verfaillie, K., & Van Rensbergen, J. (1991). Watching subtitled television: Automatic reading behavior. Communication Research, 18, 650-666.
10. Faraday, P., & Sutcliffe, A. (1996). An empirical study of attending and comprehending multimedia presentations. In Proceedings ACM Multimedia, 96, 265-275. Boston MA.
11. Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 117-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Folker, S., Ritter, H., & Sichelschmidt (2005). Processing and integrating multimodal material - the influence of color-coding. In: B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou and M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2005 (p. 690-695). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313-331.
14. Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A metaanalysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16, 511-525.
15. Graesser, A. C., & Britton, B. K. (1996). Five metaphors for text understanding. In B. K. Britton, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text. (pp. 341-352). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Graesser, A. C., Hoffman, N. L., & Clark, L. F. (1980). Structural components of reading time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 135-151.
17. Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95-123.
18. Hartley, J. T., Stojack, C. C., Mushaney, T. J., Annon, T. A. K., & Lee, D. W. (1994). Reading speed and prose memory in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 9, 216-223.
19. Hegarty, M. (1992a). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1084-1102.
20. Hegarty, M. (1992b). The mechanics of comprehension and comprehension of mechanics. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. (pp. 428-443). New York: Springer.
21. Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717-742.
22. Henderson, J. M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and picture viewing. In: Rayner, K. (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. (pp. 260-283). New York: Springer.
23. Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., & Holmberg, N. (2007, August). Newspaper reading, eye tracking and multimodality. Paper presented at the bi-annual meeting of the European Association of Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Budapest, Hungary.
24. Holsanova, J., Rahm, H., & Holmqvist, K. (2006). Entry points and reading paths on newspaper spreads: Comparing a semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements. Journal of visual communication, 5(1), 65-93.
25. Hyönä, J., Lorch, R., and Kaakinen, J. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44-55.
26. Jackson, M. D., & McClelland, J. L. (1975). Sensory and cognitive determinants of reading speed. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 565-574.
27. Jackson, M. D., & McClelland, J. L. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 151-181.
28. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
29. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The Psychology of Reading andLlanguage Comprehension. Newton: Allyn and Bacon.
30. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
31. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
32. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-100.
33. Levie, W., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustration: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195-232.
34. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.) (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
37. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368.
39. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
40. Paas, F. G., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71.
41. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
42. Rayner, K., Rotello, C. M., Stewart, A. J., Keir, J., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Integrating text and pictorial information: Eye movements when looking at print advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 219-226.
43. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
44. Salvucci, D. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Automated eye-movement protocol analysis. HumanComputer Interaction, 16, 39-86.
45. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2008). Integrating different sources of information in multimedia learning: An eye tracking study on split attention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
47. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-196.
48. Tabbers, H. K. (2002). The modality of text in multimedia instructions. Refining the design guidelines. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands Heerlen.
49. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257-287.
50. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
51. Underwood, G. (Ed.) (2005). Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.