The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person

Cognition

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 383-397

  Dewey, John A ^a   Pacherie, Elisabeth ^b   Knoblich, Guenther ^a  

^a CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b INSTITUT JEAN NICOD   (France)

Author keywords

Agency; Control; Joint action; Phenomenology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CAUSAL DISCOUNTING; COGNITION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; JUDGMENT OF CONTROL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; SELF CONTROL; SENSE OF CONTROL; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901470861     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aarts H., Custers R., Wegner D. On the inference of personal authorship: Enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information. Consciousness and Cognition 2005, 14(3):439-458.
2. Aarts H., Wegner D., Dijksterhuis A. On the feeling of doing: Dysphoria and the implicit modulation of authorship ascription. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2006, 44(11):1621-1627.
3. Blakemore S., Wolpert D., Frith C. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1(7):635-640.
4. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:443-446.
5. Desantis A., Weiss C., Schütz-Bosbach S., Waszak F. Believing and perceiving: Authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(5):e37959. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037959.
6. Dewey J.A., Carr T.H. When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions. Consciousness and Cognition 2013, 22(1):155-166. 10.1016/j.concog.2012.12.004.
7. Dewey J.A., Seiffert A.E., Carr T.H. Taking credit for success: The phenomenology of control in a goal-directed task. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(1):48-62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.007.
8. Einhorn H.J., Hogarth R.M. Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin 1986, 99(1):3-19.
9. Engbert K., Wohlschlõger A., Haggard P. Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition 2008, 107(2):693-704.
10. Feinberg I. Efference copy and corollary discharge: Implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1978, 4(4):636-640.
11. Franck N., Farrer C., Georgieff N., Marie-Cardine M., Daléry J., d' Amato T., et al. Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 2001, 158(3):454-459.
12. Friston K., Schwartenbeck P., Fitzgerald T., Moutoussis M., Behrens T., Dolan R.J. The anatomy of choice: Active inference and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00598.
13. Frith C. Explaining delusions of control: The comparator model 20years on. Beyond the Comparator Model 2012, 21(1):52-54. 10.1016/j.concog.2011.06.010.
14. Gallotti M., Frith C.D. Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17(4):160-165.
15. Haggard P., Chambon V. Sense of agency. Current Biology 2012, 22(10):R390-R392. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040.
16. Haggard P., Tsakiris M. The experience of agency. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2009, 18(4):242-246. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01644.x.
17. Jones S., de-Wit L., Fernyhough C., Meins E. A new spin on the Wheel of Fortune: Priming of action-authorship judgements and relation to psychosis-like experiences. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 17(3):576-586.
18. Kawabe T. Inferring sense of agency from the quantitative aspect of action outcome. Consciousness and Cognition 2013, 22(2):407-412. 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.006.
19. Khemlani S.S., Oppenheimer D.M. When one model casts doubt on another: A levels-of-analysis approach to causal discounting. Psychological Bulletin 2011, 137(2):195-210.
20. Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Review. Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Retrieved from <>. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve%26db=PubMed%26dopt=Citation%26list_uids=18292061.
21. Knoblich G., Repp B.H. Inferring agency from sound. Cognition 2009, 111(2):248-262. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.007.
22. Knoblich G., Stottmeister F., Kircher T. Self-monitoring in patients with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 2004, 34(08):1561-1569.
23. Langer E.J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32(2):311-328.
24. Linser K., Goschke T. Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control. Cognition 2007, 104(3):459-475. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.009.
25. Metcalfe J., Greene M. Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136(2):184-199.
26. Metcalfe J., Van Snellenberg J.X., DeRosse P., Balsam P., Malhotra A.K. Judgements of agency in schizophrenia: An impairment in autonoetic metacognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2012, 367(1594):1391-1400. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0006.
27. Moore J.W., Wegner D.M., Haggard P. Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18(4):1056-1064. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.05.004.
28. Obhi S., Hall P. Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 211(3-4):655-662. 10.1007/s00221-011-2675-2.
29. Obhi S., Hall P. Sense of agency in joint action: Influence of human and computer co-actors. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 211(3-4):663-670. 10.1007/s00221-011-2662-7.
30. Pacherie E. The sense of control and the sense of agency. Psyche 2007, 13(1):1-30.
31. Pacherie E. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 2008, 107(1):179-217.
32. Powers W.T. Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychological Review 1978, 85(5):417-435.
33. Sato A. Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency. Cognition 2009, 110(1):74-83. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.011.
34. Sato A., Yasuda A. Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 2005, 94(3):241-255.
35. Sebanz N., Bekkering H., Knoblich G. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(2):70-76.
36. Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., Newen A. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(1):219-239.
37. Tsai J.C.-C., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. The GROOP effect: Groups mimic group actions. Cognition 2011, 118(1):135-140. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.007.
38. Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Franck N., Mainy N., Sirigu A. A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 2005, 96(3):215-231. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.002.
39. Van der Wel R.P.R.D., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 10.1016/j.concog.2012.04.001.
40. Wegner D., Wheatley T. Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 1999, 54(7):480-492.
41. Weiss C., Herwig A., Schütz-Bosbach S. The self in social interactions: Sensory attenuation of auditory action effects is stronger in interactions with others. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(7):e22723. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022723.
42. Zultan R., Gerstenberg T., Lagnado D.A. Finding fault: Causality and counterfactuals in group attributions. Cognition 2012, 125(3):429-440.