When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 155-166

  Dewey, John A ^a   Carr, Thomas H ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forward model; Joint action; Mental causation; Sense of agency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; RESPONSIBILITY; SENSE OF AGENCY;

EID: 84872192579     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arrington C.M., Logan G.D. Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:633-702.
2. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods 2005, 37:379-384.
3. Bayne, T., & Levy, N. (2006). The feeling of doing: deconstructing the phenomenology of agency: Disorders of volition (pp. 49-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Blakemore S., Wolpert D., Frith C. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:635-640.
5. Blakemore S., Wolpert D., Frith C. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:237-242.
6. Couchman J.J., Beasley R., Pfordresher P.Q. The experience of agency in sequence production with altered auditory feedback. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21:186-203.
7. Decety J., Jackson P.L., Sommerville J.A., Chaminade T., Meltzoff A.N. The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage 2004, 23:744-751.
8. Dewey J.A., Seiffert A.E., Carr T.H. Taking credit for success: The phenomenology of control in a goal-directed task. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:48-62.
9. Engbert K., Wohlschlõger A., Haggard P. Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition 2008, 107:693-704.
10. Farrer C., Bouchereau M., Jeannerod M., Franck N. Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behavioural Neurology 2008, 19:53-57.
11. Gallagher S. The natural philosophy of agency. Philosophy Compass 2007, 2(2):347-357.
12. Graf M., Reitzner B., Corves C., Casile A., Giese M., Prinz W. Predicting point-light actions in real-time. NeuroImage 2007, 36:T22-T32.
13. Haggard P., Clark S., Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:382-385.
14. Jeannerod M. The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 2003, 142:1-15.
15. Johnson J.T., Ogawa K.H., Delforge A., Early D. Causal primacy and comparative fault: The effect of position in a causal chain on judgments of legal responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1989, 15:161-174.
16. Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 59-191). Burlington: Elsevier.
17. Metcalfe J., Mischel W. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review 1999, 106:3-19.
18. Michotte, A. E. (1963). The perception of causality (T. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
19. Obhi S.S., Hall P. Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 211:655-662.
20. Pacherie E. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 2008, 107:179-217.
21. Ramnani N., Miall R. A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:85-90.
22. Sato A. Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequences of actions. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:1219-1227.
23. Sato A. Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency. Cognition 2009, 110:74-83.
24. Sato A., Yasuda A. Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 2005, 94:241-255.
25. Shanks, D. R., Pearson, S. M., & Dickinson, A. (1989). Temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality by human subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41b, 139-159.
26. Stanne M., Johnson D., Johnson R. Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:133-154.
27. Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., Newen A. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:219-239.
28. van der Wel R.P.R.D., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21:1267-1279.
29. Vinokur A., Ajzen I. Relative importance of prior and immediate events: A causal primacy effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 42:820-829.
30. Wegner D.M. The illusion of conscious will 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
31. Wegner D., Wheatley T. Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 1999, 54:480-492.
32. Weiss C., Herwig A., Schütz-Bosbach S. The self in action effects: Selective attenuation of self-generated sounds. Cognition 2011, 121:207-218.
33. Wilson M., Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:460-473.
34. Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J. (2011). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 143-146). Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM.
35. Wohlschlõger, A., & Haggard, P. (2003). The perceived onset time of self- and other-generated actions. Psychological Science, 14, 586-591.