The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1267-1279

  van der Wel, Robrecht P R D ^a,b   Sebanz, Natalie ^b,c   Knoblich, Guenther ^b,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Forward model; Joint action; Mental causation; Sense of agency; Skill learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COORDINATION; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; SENSE OF AGENCY; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865374490     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Blakemore S.J., Frith C. Self-awareness and action. Current Opinions in Neurobiology 2003, 13(2):219-224.
2. Bosga J., Meulenbroek R.G.J. Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Motor Control 2007, 11:235-258.
3. Bratman M.E. Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review 1992, 101:327-341.
4. Bratman M. Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philosophical Studies 2009, 144:149-165.
5. Bratman M.E. Shared agency. Philosophy of the social sciences 2009, 14-59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Mantzavinos (Ed.).
6. Brownell C. Early developments in joint action. Review of Philosophy & Psychology 2011, 2:193-211.
7. de Vignemont F., Fourneret P. The sense of agency: A philosophical and empirical review of the " Who" system. Consciousness and Cognition 2004, 13:1-19.
8. Fisher R.A. On the 'probable error' of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron 1921, 1:3-32.
9. Fletcher P.C., Frith C.D. Perceiving is believing: A Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10:48-58.
10. Fotopoulou A., Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Vagopoulou A., Rudd A., Kopelman M. The role of motor intention in motor awareness: An experimental study on anosognosia for hemiplegia. Brain 2008, 131:3432-3442.
11. Fourneret P., Jeannerod M. Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:1133-1140.
12. Frith C.D., Blakemore S., Wolpert D. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 2000, 1771-1788.
13. Gallagher S. The natural philosophy of agency. Philosophical Compass 2007, 2(2):347-357.
14. Haggard P., Tsakiris M. The experience of agency: Feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2009, 18(4):242-246.
15. Hommel B., Muesseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC). Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-937.
16. Jeannerod M. The 25th Bartlett lecture. To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1999, 52A:1-29.
17. Jeannerod M. The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 2003, 142:1-15.
18. Jeannerod M. The origin of voluntary action. History of a physiological concept. Comptes Rendus Biologies 2006, 329(5-6):354-362.
19. Knoblich G., Jordan S. Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2003, 29:1006-1016.
20. Knoblich G., Kircher T. Deceiving oneself about being in control: Conscious detection of changes in visuo-motor coupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:657-666.
21. Knoblich G., Repp B. Inferring agency from sound. Cognition 2009, 111:248-262.
22. Knoblich G., Butterfill S., Sebanz N. Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54 2011, 59-101. Academic Press, Burlington. B. Ross (Ed.).
23. Metcalfe J., Greene M.J. Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:184-199.
24. Newman-Norlund R.D., Bosga J., Meulenbroek R.G.J., Bekkering H. Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing. NeuroImage 2008, 41:169-177.
25. Pacherie E. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 2008, 107:179-217.
26. Pacherie E. The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency vs. joint-agency. Joint attention: New developments 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. A. Seemann (Ed.).
27. Preston J., Wegner D.W. The eureka error: Inadvertent plagiarism by misattributions of effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:575-584.
28. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154.
29. Repp B.H., Knoblich G. Toward a psychophysics of agency: Detecting gain and loss of control over auditory action effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:469-482.
30. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
31. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11:264-274.
32. Sato A. Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency. Cognition 2009, 110:74-83.
33. Sato A., Yasuda A. Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 2005, 94(3):241-255.
34. Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Prinz W. Representing others' actions: Just like one's own?. Cognition 2003, 88:B11-B21.
35. Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Prinz W. How two share a task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:1234-1246.
36. Tomasello M. Why we cooperate 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Tsakiris M., Longo M.R., Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:2740-2749.
38. van der Wel, R.P.R.D., & Knoblich, G. (in press). Cues to agency: The role of body, action, and thought. Chapter to appear in H. Terrace, J. Metcalfe (Eds.). Joint Attention and Agency.
39. van der Wel R.P.R.D., Knoblich G., Sebanz N. Let the force be with us: Dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37(5):1420-1431.
40. Wegner D.M. The illusion of conscious will 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, US.
41. Wegner D.M., Fuller V.A., Sparrow B. Clever hands: Uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:5-19.
42. Wegner D.M., Sparrow B., Winerman L. Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:838-848.
43. Wegner D.M., Wheatley T. Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 1999, 54(7):480-492.
44. Wenke D., Atmaca S., Hollaender A., Liepelt R., Baess P., Prinz W. What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2011, 2:147-172.