The effect of Epistasis on sexually antagonistic genetic variation

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1787, 2014, Pages

  Arnqvist, Göran ^a   Vellnow, Nikolas ^b   Rowe, Locke ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gene interaction; Mutation order speciation; Recombination; Sexual conflict; Sexual dimorphism; SimuPOP

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; EPISTASIS; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; RECOMBINATION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

EID: 84901444468     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0489     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173, 176-187. (doi:10.1086/595841)
2. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. 2009 Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 280-288. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.005)
3. van Doorn GS. 2009 Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1168, 52-71. (doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04573.x)
4. Rice WR. 1996 Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381, 232-234. (doi:10. 1038/381232a0)
5. Rice WR. 1998 Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from the gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6217-6221. (doi:10.1073/pnas.95.11.6217)
6. Chippindale AK, Gibson JR, Rice WR. 2001 Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1671-1675. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 98.4.1671)
7. Pischedda A, Chippindale AK. 2006 Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PloS Biol. 4, e356. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio. 0040356)
8. Bilde T, Foged A, Schilling N, Arnqvist G. 2009 Postmating sexual selection favours males that sire offspring with low fitness. Science 324, 1705-1706. (doi:10.1126/science.1171675)
9. Innocenti P, Morrow EH. 2010 The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000335. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio. 1000335)
10. Long TAF, Rice WR. 2007 Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 3105-3112. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2007.1140)
11. Brommer JE, Kirkpatrick M, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L. 2007 The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implications for sexual selection. PLoS ONE 2, e744. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000744)
12. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA. 2004 Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429, 65-67. (doi:10.1038/ nature02492)
13. Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB. 2007 Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447, 1107-1109. (doi:10.1038/nature05912)
14. Mokkonen M, Koskela E, Mappes T, Mills SC. 2012 Sexual antagonism for testosterone maintains multiple mating behaviour. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 277-283. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01903.x)
15. Kidwell JF, Clegg MT, Stewart FM, Prout T. 1977 Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating. Genetics 85, 171-183.
16. Prout T. 2000 How well does opposing selection maintain variation? In Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology (eds RS Singh, CB Krimbas), pp. 157-181. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fry JD. 2010 The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution 64, 1510-1516.
18. Arnqvist G. 2011 Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation. Evolution 65, 2111-2116. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01270.x)
19. Rice WR. 1984 Sex-chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 735-742. (doi:10.2307/2408385)
20. Blachford A, Agrawal AF. 2006 Assortative mating for fitness and the evolution of recombination. Evolution 60, 1337-1343. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01213.x)
21. Patten MM, Haig D, U'beda F. 2010 Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium. Evolution 64, 3638-3642. (doi:10. 1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01100.x)
22. Frankel WN, Schork NJ. 1996 Who's afraid of epistasis? Nat. Genet. 14, 371-373. (doi:10.1038/ ng1296-371)
23. Brodie ED. 2000 Why evolutionary genetics does not always add up. In Epistasis and the evolutionary process (eds JB Wolf et al.), pp. 3-19. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Wade MJ, Winther RG, Agrawal AF, Goodnight CJ. 2001 Alternative definitions of epistasis: dependence and interaction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 498-504. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02213-3)
25. Bull JJ. 1983 Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin/ Cummings Publ. Comp., Inc.
26. Rice WR. 1987 The accumulation of sexually antagonistic genes as a selective agent promoting the evolution of reduced recombination between primitive sex chromosomes. Evolution 41, 911-914. (doi:10.2307/2408899)
27. van Doorn GS, Kirkpatrick M. 2007 Turnover of sex chromosomes induced by sexual conflict. Nature 449, 909-912. (doi:10.1038/nature06178)
28. Connallon T, Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2010 Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64, 1671-1682. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00934.x)
29. Merilä J, Sheldon BC, Ellegren H. 1998 Quantitative genetics of sexual size dimorphism in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Evolution 52, 870-876. (doi:10.2307/2411281)
30. Tarka M, Akesson M, Hasselquist D, Hansson B. 2014 Intralocus sexual conflict over wing length in a wild migratory bird. Am. Nat. 183, 62-73. (doi:10. 1086/674072)
31. Berg EC, Maklakov AA. 2012 Sexes suffer from suboptimal lifespan because of genetic conflict in a seed beetle. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4296-4302. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1345)
32. Whitlock MC, Phillips PC, Moore FBG, Tonsor S. 1995 Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 601-629. (doi:10.1146/annurev. es.26.110195.003125)
33. Martin G, Elena SF, Lenormand T. 2007 Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat. Genet. 39, 555-560. (doi:10.1038/ng1998)
34. Chou HH, Chiu HC, Delaney NF, Segrè D, Marx CJ. 2011 Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 332, 1190-1192. (doi:10.1126/science. 1203799)
35. Fisher RA. 1930 The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
36. Khan AI, Dinh DM, Schneider D, Lenski RE, Cooper TF. 2011 Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 332, 1193-1196. (doi:10.1126/science. 1203801)
37. Ayala FJ, Campbell CA. 1974 Frequency-dependent selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 115-138. (doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000555)
38. Mokkonen M, Kokko H, Koskela E, Lehtonen J, Mappes T, Martiskainen H, Mills SC. 2011 Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus. Science 334, 972-974. (doi:10.1126/science.1208708)
39. Reed FA. 2007 Two-locus epistasis with sexually antagonistic selection: a genetic Parrondo's paradox. Genetics 176, 1923-1929. (doi:10.1534/genetics. 106.069997)
40. Connallon T, Clark AG. 2010 Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression. Evolution 64, 3417-3442. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01136.x)
41. Connallon T, Clark AG. 2012 A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation. Genetics 190, 1477-1489. (doi:10.1534/genetics. 111.137117)
42. Hayashi TI, Vose M, Gavrilets S. 2007 Genetic differentiation by sexual conflict. Evolution 61, 516-529. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00059.x)
43. Peng B, Kimmel M. 2007 Simulations provide support for the common disease-common variant hypothesis. Genetics 175, 763-776. (doi:10.1534/ genetics.106.058164)
44. Peng B, Kimmel M, Amos CI. 2012 Forward-time population genetics simulations: methods, implementation, and applications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
45. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P. 2001 The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157, 245-261. (doi:10.1086/ 319193)
46. Vellnow N. 2012 On the maintenance of sexually antagonistic genetic variation. MSc Thesis, Uppsala University. (http://www.ibg.uu.se/)
47. Lewontin RC. 1964 The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49, 49-67.
48. U'beda F, Haig D, Patten MM. 2011 Stable linkage disequilibrium owing to sexual antagonism. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 855-862. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1201)
49. Wade MJ, Goodnight CJ. 1998 The theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: when nature does many small experiments. Evolution 52, 1537-1553. (doi:10.2307/2411328)
50. Wade MJ. 2000 Epistasis as a genetic constraint within populations and an accelerant of adaptive divergence among them. In Epistasis and the evolutionary process (eds JB Wolf et al.), pp. 213-231. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51. Corbett-Detig RB, Zhou J, Clark AG, Hartl DL, Ayroles JF. 2013 Genetic incompatibilities are widespread within species. Nature 504, 135-137. (doi:10.1038/ nature12678)
52. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005 Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Arbuthnott D, Dutton EM, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD. 2014 The ecology of sexual conflict: ecologically dependent parallel evolution of male harm and female resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecol. Lett. 17, 221-228. (doi:10.1111/ele.12222)
54. Gavrilets S, Arnqvist G, Friberg U. 2001 The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 531-539. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.2000.1382)
55. Rowe L, Cameron E, Day T. 2005 Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 165, S5-S18. (doi:10.1086/429395)
56. Meiklejohn CD, Parsch J, Ranz JM, Hartl DL. 2003 Rapid evolution of male-biased gene expression in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100, 9894-9899. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1630690100)
57. Zhang Y, Sturgill D, Parisi M, Kumar S, Oliver B. 2007 Constraint and turnover in sex-biased gene expression in the genus Drosophila. Nature 450, 233-238. (doi:10.1038/nature06323)
58. Baker DA, Meadows LA, Wang J, Dow JA, Russell S. 2007 Variable sexually dimorphic gene expression in laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics 8, 454. (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-454)
59. Dobzhansky T. 1955 A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 20, 1-15. (doi:10. 1101/SQB.1955.020.01.003)
60. Rice WR. 1998 Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In Endless forms: species and speciation (eds DJ Howard, SH Berlocher), pp. 261-270. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61. Parker GA, Partridge L. 1998 Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 261-274. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0208)
62. Howard DJ, Reece M, Gregory PG, Chu J, Cain ML. 1998 The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms. In Endless forms: species and speciation (eds DJ Howard, SH Berlocher), pp. 279-288. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63. Gavrilets S. 2000 Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403, 886-889. (doi:10.1038/35002564)
64. Kimura M, Ihara Y. 2009 Replicator-dynamics models of sexual conflict. J. Theor. Biol. 260, 90-97. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.06.003)
65. Mani GS, Clarke BC. 1990 Mutation order-a major stochastic process in evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 240, 29-37. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1990.0025)
66. Schluter D. 2009 Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323, 737-741. (doi:10. 1126/science.1160006)
67. Price TD. 2007 Speciation in birds. Woodbury, NY: Roberts and Company.