Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3638-3642

  Patten, Manus M ^a,b   Haig, David ^a   Úbeda, Francisco ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; DISEQUILIBRIUM; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; HAPLOTYPES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 78650031783     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01100.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:280-288.
2. Brommer, J. E., M. Kirkpatrick, A. Qvärnstrom, and L. Gustafsson 2007. The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implication for sexual selection. PLoS One 2:e744. doi:.
3. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice 2001. Negative genetic correlation for fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1671-1675.
4. Cox, R. M., and R. Calsbeek 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173:176-187.
5. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura 1970. An introduction to population genetic theory. Harper and Row, New York, NY .
6. Delcourt, M., M. W. Blows, and H. D. Rundle 2009. Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and a novel environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:2009-2014.
7. Fairbairn, D. J., W. U. Blankenhorn, and T. Székely 2007. Sex, size, and gender roles. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K .
8. Foerster, K., T. Coulson, B. C. Sheldon, J. M. Pemberton, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and L. E. B. Kruuk 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447:1107-1109.
9. Fry, J. D. 2010. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution 64:1510-1516.
10. Gibson, J. R., A. K. Chippindale, and W. R. Rice 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:499-505.
11. Haldane, J. B. S. 1926. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection III. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 23:363-372.
12. Innocenti, P., and E. H. Morrow 2010. The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosphila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000335.
13. Karlin, S. 1975. General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results, and interpretations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:364-398.
14. Kidwell, J. F., M. T. Clegg, F. M. Stewart, and T. Prout 1977. Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in two sexes under random mating. Genetics 85:171-183.
15. Lewontin, R. C., and K. Kojima 1960. The evolutionary dynamics of complex polymorphisms. Evolution 14:458-472.
16. Mathworks. 2009. Matlab 7.9.0.529 (R2009b).
17. Owen, A. R. G. 1953. A genetical system admitting of two distinct stable equilibria under natural selection. Heredity 7:97-102.
18. Patten, M. M., and D. Haig 2009. Maintenance or loss of genetic variation under sexual and parental antagonism. Evolution 63:2888-2095.
19. Pischedda, A., and A. K. Chippindale 2006. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PLoS Biol. 4:2099-2103.
20. Prasad, N. G., S. Bedhomme, T. Day, and A. K. Chippindale 2007. An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited selection. Am. Nat. 169:29-37.
21. Prout, T. 2000. How well does opposing selection maintain variation? Pp. 157-181 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge Univ. Press; Cambridge, U.K .
22. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
23. Úbeda, F., D. Haig, and M. M. Patten Stable linkage disequilibrium due to sexual antagonism. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. In press .
24. Van Doorn, G. S. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1168:52-71.