Intermittent electrical stimuli for guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell lineage commitment towards neural-like cells on electroconductive substrates

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 24, 2014, Pages 6219-6235

  Thrivikraman, Greeshma ^a   Madras, Giridhar ^a   Basu, Bikramjit ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Electric field; Mesenchymal stem cells; Neural like differentiation; Polyaniline; Substrate conductivity

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC FIELDS; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; MORPHOLOGY; POLYANILINE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SUBSTRATES;

ELECTRIC FIELD STRENGTH; ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVE SUBSTRATES; EXTERNAL ELECTRIC FIELD; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS (HMSCS); MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONS; SUBSTRATE CONDUCTIVITY;

STEM CELLS;

BETA TUBULIN; NESTIN; POLYANILINE; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DAMAGE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NERVE CELL; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; APOPTOSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL COUNT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METABOLISM; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; THERMODYNAMICS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ANILINE COMPOUNDS; APOPTOSIS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL COUNT; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NESTIN; NEURONS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84901411532     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Hronik-Tupaj M., Rice W.L., Cronin-Golomb M., Kaplan D.L., Georgakoudi I. Osteoblastic differentiation and stress response of human mesenchymal stem cells exposed to alternating current electric fields. Biomed Eng Online 2011, 10:9.
2. Robinson K.R. The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review. JCell Biol 1985, 101(6):2023-2027.
3. Sun S., Titushkin I., Cho M. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and orientation in 3D collagen scaffold by electrical stimulus. Bioelectrochemistry 2006, 69(2):133-141.
4. Hotary K.B., Robinson K.R. Endogenous electrical currents and voltage gradients in Xenopus embryos and the consequences of their disruption. Dev Biol 1994, 166(2):789-800.
5. Wu W., Zhao H., Xie B., Liu H., Chen Y., Jiao G., et al. Implanted spike wave electric stimulation promotes survival of the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and functional recovery in the spinal cord injured rats. Neurosci Lett 2011, 491(1):73-78.
6. McLaughlin S., Poo M.M. The role of electro-osmosis in the electric-field-induced movement of charged macromolecules on the surfaces of cells. Biophys J 1981, 34(1):85-93.
7. Cho M.R., Thatte H.S., Silvia M.T., Golan D.E. Transmembrane calcium influx induced by ac electric fields. FASEB J 1999, 13(6):677-683.
8. Lim K., Hexiu J., Kim J., Seonwoo H., Cho W.J., Choung P.H., et al. Effects of electromagnetic fields on osteogenesis of human alveolar bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Res Int 2013, 2013:296019.
9. Feng J.F., Liu J., Zhang X.Z., Zhang L., Jiang J.Y., Nolta J., et al. Guided migration of neural stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells by an electric field. Stem Cells 2012, 30(2):349-355.
10. Hammerick K.E., Longaker M.T., Prinz F.B. Invitro effects of direct current electric fields on adipose-derived stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 397(1):12-17.
11. Sauer H., Rahimi G., Hescheler J., Wartenberg M. Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells. JCell Biochem 1999, 75(4):710-723.
12. Prabhakaran M.P., Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L., Jin G., Ramakrishna S. Electrospun conducting polymer nanofibers and electrical stimulation of nerve stem cells. JBiosci Bioeng 2011, 112:501-507.
13. Koh C.J., Atala A. Tissue engineering, stem cells, and cloning: opportunities for regenerative medicine. JAm Soc Nephrol 2004, 15(5):1113-1125.
14. Jayakumar R., Nair S., Prabhakaran M., Venugopal J., Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L., Kai D., et al. Stem cells and nanostructures for advanced tissue regeneration. Biomed Appl Polym Nanofibers 2012, 246:21-62. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
15. Tae S.K., Lee S.H., Park J.S., Im G.I. Mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomed Mater 2006, 1(2):63-71.
16. Richardson S.M., Hoyland J.A., Mobasheri R., Csaki C., Shakibaei M., Mobasheri A. Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: opportunities and challenges for articular cartilage and intervertebral disc tissue engineering. JCell Physiol 2010, 222(1):23-32.
17. Liu Z.J., Zhuge Y., Velazquez O.C. Trafficking and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. JCell Biochem 2009, 106(6):984-991.
18. HassanHeidari M., Noruzian M., Namjo Z., Frahani R., Ebrahimi A., Bandepour M., et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells differentiation to skeletal muscle cells invitro study. JBasic Appl Sci Res 2013, 3(8):156-164.
19. Xu W., Zhang X., Qian H., Zhu W., Sun X., Hu J., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from adult human bone marrow differentiate into a cardiomyocyte phenotype invitro. Exp Biol Med 2004, 229(7):623-631.
20. Lee K.D., Kuo T.K., Whang-Peng J., Chung Y.F., Lin C.T., Chou S.H., et al. Invitro hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Hepatology 2004, 40(6):1275-1284.
21. Benvenuti S., Saccardi R., Luciani P., Urbani S., Deledda C., Cellai I., et al. Neuronal differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: changes in the expression of the Alzheimer's disease-related gene seladin-1. Exp Cell Res 2006, 312(13):2592-2604.
22. Mareschi K., Novara M., Rustichelli D., Ferrero I., Guido D., Carbone E., et al. Neural differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: evidence for expression of neural markers and eag K+ channel types. Exp Hematol 2006, 34(11):1563-1572.
23. Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., Chen C.S. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5(1):17-26.
24. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126(4):677-689.
25. Hu X., Park S.-H., Gil E.S., Xia X.-X., Weiss A.S., Kaplan D.L. The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic-differentiation of cells on silk-elastin biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011, 32(34):8979-8989.
26. Phillips J.E., Petrie T.A., Creighton F.P., García A.J. Human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation on self-assembled monolayers presenting different surface chemistries. Acta Biomater 2010, 6(1):12-20.
27. Ferreira L., Karp J.M., Nobre L., Langer R. New opportunities: the use of nanotechnologies to manipulate and track stem cells. Cell stem Cell 2008, 3(2):136-146.
28. Doran M.R., Frith J.E., Prowse A.B., Fitzpatrick J., Wolvetang E.J., Munro T.P., et al. Defined high protein content surfaces for stem cell culture. Biomaterials 2010, 31(19):5137-5142.
29. Brammer K.S., Choi C., Frandsen C.J., Oh S., Jin S. Hydrophobic nanopillars initiate mesenchymal stem cell aggregation and osteo-differentiation. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(2):683-690.
30. Oh S., Brammer K.S., Li Y.S.J., Teng D., Engler A.J., Chien S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106(7):2130-2135.
31. Olivares-Navarrete R., Hyzy S.L., Hutton D.L., Erdman C.P., Wieland M., Boyan B.D., et al. Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on the induction of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblast lineage. Biomaterials 2010, 31(10):2728-2735.
32. Li N., Zhang Q., Gao S., Song Q., Huang R., Wang L., et al. Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep 2013, 3:1604.
33. Breukers R.D., Gilmore K.J., Kita M., Wagner K.K., Higgins M.J., Moulton S.E., et al. Creating conductive structures for cell growth: growth and alignment of myogenic cell types on polythiophenes. JBiomed Mater Res A 2010, 95A(1):256-268.
34. Yow S.-Z., Lim T.H., Yim E.K.F., Lim C.T., Leong K.W. A3D electroactive polypyrrole-collagen fibrous scaffold for tissue engineering. Polymers 2011, 3(1):527-544.
35. Masoud M., Mehrnoush M., Daryoosh V., Lobat T. Electroconductive nanocomposite scaffolds: a new strategy into tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, nanocomposites - new trends and developments. InTech 2012, 369-392.
36. Ostrakhovitch E.A., Byers J.C., O'Neil K.D., Semenikhin O.A. Directed differentiation of embryonic P19 cells and neural stem cells into neural lineage on conducting PEDOT-PEG and ITO glass substrates. Arch Biochem Biophys 2012, 528(1):21-31.
37. Guimard N.K., Gomez N., Schmidt C.E. Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32(8-9):876-921.
38. Bidez P.R., Li S., MacDiarmid A.G., Venancio E.C., Wei Y., Lelkes P.I. Polyaniline, an electroactive polymer, supports adhesion and proliferation of cardiac myoblasts. JBiomater Sci Polym Ed 2006, 17(1-2):199-212.
39. Wang H.J., Ji L.W., Li D.F., Wang J.Y. Characterization of nanostructure and cell compatibility of polyaniline films with different dopant acids. JPhys Chem B 2008, 112(9):2671-2677.
40. Oren R., Sfez R., Korbakov N., Shabtai K., Cohen A., Erez H., et al. Electrically conductive 2D-PAN-containing surfaces as a culturing substrate for neurons. JBiomater Sci Polym Ed 2004, 15(11):1355-1374.
41. Guo Y., Li M., Mylonakis A., Han J., MacDiarmid A.G., Chen X., et al. Electroactive oligoaniline-containing self-assembled monolayers for tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8(10):3025-3034.
42. Humpolicek P., Kasparkova V., Saha P., Stejskal J. Biocompatibility of polyaniline. Synt Met 2012, 162(7-8):722-727.
43. Jun I., Jeong S., Shin H. The stimulation of myoblast differentiation by electrically conductive sub-micron fibers. Biomaterials 2009, 30(11):2038-2047.
44. Ramamurthy P.C., Mallya A.N., Joseph A., Harrell W.R., Gregory R.V. Synthesis and characterization of high molecular weight polyaniline for organic electronic applications. Polym Eng Sci 2012, 52(8):1821-1830.
45. Oliver W.C., Pharr G.M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement-sensing indentation systems. JMater Res 1992, 7:1564-1583.
46. Cruz-Silva R., Romero-Garcia J., Angulo-Sanchez J.L., Flores-Loyola E., Farias M.H., Castillon F.F., et al. Comparative study of polyaniline cast films prepared from enzymatically and chemically synthesized polyaniline. Polymer 2004, 45(14):4711-4717.
47. Xiang J., Drzal L.T. Templated growth of polyaniline on exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) and its thermoelectric properties. Polymer 2012, 53(19):4202-4210.
48. van der Pauw L.J. Amethod of measuring specific resistivity and hall effect of discs of arbitrary shape. Philips Res Rep 1958, 13:1-9.
49. Cho M.R. Areview of electrocoupling mechanisms mediating facilitated wound healing. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 2002, 30(4):1504-1515.
50. Khatib L., Golan D.E., Cho M. Physiologic electrical stimulation provokes intracellular calcium increase mediated by phospholipase C activation in human osteoblasts. FASEB J 2004, 18(15):1903-1905.
51. Dubey A.K., Gupta S.D., Basu B. Optimization of electrical stimulation parameters for enhanced cell proliferation on biomaterial surfaces. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011, 98(1):18-29.
52. Dubey A.K., Agrawal P., Misra R.D., Basu B. Pulsed electric field mediated invitro cellular response of fibroblast and osteoblast-like cells on conducting austenitic stainless steel substrate. JMater Sci Mater Med 2013, 24(7):1789-1798.
53. Dubey A.K., Basu B. Pulsed electrical stimulation and surface charge induced cell growth on multistage spark plasma sintered hydroxyapatite-barium titanate piezobiocomposite. JAm Cer Soc 2013, 97(2):481-489.
54. Titushkin I., Cho M. Regulation of cell cytoskeleton and membrane mechanics by electric field: role of linker proteins. Biophys J 2009, 96(2):717-728.
55. Burova E., Borodkina A., Shatrova A., Nikolsky N. Sublethal oxidative stress induces the premature senescence of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from endometrium. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2013, 2013:474931.
56. Settleman J. Tension precedes commitment-even for a Stem Cell. Mol Cell 2004, 14(2):148-150.
57. Gilmore K.J., Kita M., Han Y., Gelmi A., Higgins M.J., Moulton S.E., et al. Skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation on polypyrrole substrates doped with extracellular matrix components. Biomaterials 2009, 30(29):5292-5304.
58. Wong J.Y., Langer R., Ingber D.E. Electrically conducting polymers can noninvasively control the shape and growth of mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994, 91(8):3201-3204.
59. Li L., Jiang J. Stem cell niches and endogenous electric fields in tissue repair. Front Med 2011, 5(1):40-44.
60. Stein G.S., Lian J.B., Owen T.A. Relationship of cell growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J 1990, 4(13):3111-3123.
61. Teng C.-C., Kuo H.-C., Cheng H.-C., Wang T.-C., Sze C.-I. The inhibitory effect of CIL-102 on the growth of human astrocytoma cells is mediated by the generation of reactive oxygen species and induction of ERK1/2 MAPK. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2012, 263(1):73-80.
62. Kuznetsov A.V., Kehrer I., Kozlov A.V., Haller M., Redl H., Hermann M., et al. Mitochondrial ROS production under cellular stress: comparison of different detection methods. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011, 400(8):2383-2390.
63. Valle-Prieto A., Conget P.A. Human mesenchymal stem cells efficiently manage oxidative stress. Stem Cells Dev 2010, 19(12):1885-1893.
64. Treiser M.D., Yang E.H., Gordonov S., Cohen D.M., Androulakis I.P., Kohn J., et al. Cytoskeleton-based forecasting of stem cell lineage fates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107(2):610-615.
65. Rajnicek A.M., Foubister L.E., McCaig C.D. Temporally and spatially coordinated roles for Rho, Rac, Cdc42 and their effectors in growth cone guidance by a physiological electric field. JCell Sci 2006, 119(Pt 9):1723-1735.
66. Cooper G.M. The cell: a molecular approach 2000, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (MA), Signal transduction and the cytoskeleton. 2nd ed.
67. Tropel P., Platet N., Platel J.C., Noel D., Albrieux M., Benabid A.L., et al. Functional neuronal differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2006, 24(12):2868-2876.
68. Ma K., Fox L., Shi G., Shen J., Liu Q., Pappas J.D., et al. Generation of neural stem cell-like cells from bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Neurol Res 2011, 33(10):1083-1093.
69. Jin K., Mao X.O., Batteur S., Sun Y., Greenberg D.A. Induction of neuronal markers in bone marrow cells: differential effects of growth factors and patterns of intracellular expression. Exp Neurol 2003, 184(1):78-89.
70. Thrivikraman G., Mallik P.K., Basu B. Substrate conductivity dependent modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation invitro. Biomaterials 2013, 34(29):7073-7085.
71. Jain S., Sharma A., Basu B. Vertical electric field stimulated neural cell functionality on porous amorphous carbon electrodes. Biomaterials 2013, 34(37):9252-9263.