Pulsed electric field mediated in vitro cellular response of fibroblast and osteoblast-like cells on conducting austenitic stainless steel substrate

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1789-1798

  Dubey, Ashutosh Kumar ^a   Agrawal, Parnika ^b   Misra, R Devesh Kumar ^c   Basu, Bikramjit ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTENITIC STAINLESS; CULTURE CONDITIONS; MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; PULSE ELECTRIC FIELDS; PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD; SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES; SUBSTRATE CONDUCTIVITY;

ASPECT RATIO; AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; ELECTRIC FIELDS; GROWTH KINETICS; SINTERING; SUBSTRATES;

CELLS;

HYDROXYAPATITE; STAINLESS STEEL;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL GROWTH; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CELL SIZE; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FIBROBLAST; IN VITRO STUDY; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84879799976     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4921-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Borsari V, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Torricelli P, Salito A, Chiesa R, Chiusoli L, Volpert A, Rimondini L, Giardino R. Physical characterization of different-roughness titanium surfaces, with and without hydroxyapatite coating and their effect on human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2005;75B:359-68.
2. Arenas MA, Tate TJ, Conde A, De Damboreba J. Corrosion behaviour of nitrogen implanted titanium in simulated body fluid. Br Corros J. 2000;35:232-6.
3. Willman G. Coating of implants with hydroxyapatite-material connections between bone and metal. Adv Eng Mater. 1999;1:95-105.
4. Ahl T, Andersson G, Herberts P, Kalen R. Electrical treatment of non-united fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:585-8.
5. Ahmed AN, Islam KM, Rahman MF, Islam MS, Rabbani KS. Effect of electrical stimulation on the early phase of healing in induced fracture in rat tibiae. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 1987;13:69-79.
6. Akai M, Wadano Y, Yabuki T, Oda H, Sirasaki Y, Tateishi T. Effect of a direct electric current on modification of bone and ligament repair processes-experimental investigation of a rabbit model. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991;65:196-206.
7. Albert SF, Wong E. Electrical stimulation of bone repair. Clin Podiatry Med Surg. 1991;8:923-35.
8. Onibere R, Khanna A. The role of electrical stimulation in fracture healing. Internet J Orthop Surg. 2009;11(2):ISSN: 1531-2968.
9. Dubey AK, Gupta SD, Basu B. Optimization of electrical stimulation conditions for enhanced fibroblast cell proliferation on biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011;98B:18-29.
10. 3 composites. Ferroelectrics. 2011;423(1):63-76.
11. 3 in a composite with hydroxyapatite as orthopedic implant materials. Int Ferroelectr. 2011;131(1):119-26.
12. Dubey AK, Gupta SD, Kumar R, Tewari A, Basu B. Time constant determination for electrical equivalent of biological cells. J Appl Phys. 2009;105:084705.
13. Dubey AK, Banerjee M, Basu B. Biological cell-electric field interaction: stochastic approach. J Biol Phys. 2010;37:39-50.
14. Dubey AK, Kumar R, Banerjee M, Basu B. Analytical computation of electric field for onset of electroporation. J Comput Theor Nanosci. 2012;9:1-7.
15. Mikami K, Haseba T, Ohno Y. Ethanol induces transient arrest of cell division (G2+M Block) followed by G0/G1 block: dose effects of short- and longer-term ethanol exposure on cell cycle and cell functions. Alcohol Alcohol. 1997;32(2):145-52.
16. Rodan SB, Imai Y, Thiede MA, Wesolowski G, Thompson D, Bar-Shavit Z, Shull S, Mann K, Rodan GA. Characterization of a human osteosarcoma cell line (SaOS-2) with osteoblastic properties. Cancer Res. 1987;47:4961-6.
17. Yang Y. Synthesis, characterization, microfabrication, and biological applications of conducting polymers. Dissertation for Doctorate. The Ohio State University; 2005.
18. Bourguignon GJ, Bourguignon LYW. Electric stimulation of protein and DNA synthesis in human fibroblasts. FASEB J. 1987;1:398-402.
19. Ercan B, Webster TJ. Greater osteoblast proliferation on anodized nanotubular titanium upon electrical stimulation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(4):477-85.
20. Cho MC, Thatte HS, Silvia MT, Golan DE. Transmembrane calcium influx induced by ac electric fields. FASEB J. 1999;13:677-83.
21. McLeod KJ, Rubin CT, Donahue HJ, Guilak F. On the mechanism of extremely low frequency (ELF) electric field interactions with living tissue. IEEE. 1992:65-66.
22. Yang WP, Onuma EK, Hui SW. Response of C3H/10T1/2 fibroblasts to an external steady electric field stimulation. Exp Cell Res. 1984;155:92-104.
23. Finkelstein E, Chang W, Chao PHG, Gruber D, Minden A, Hung CT, Bulinski JC. Roles of microtubules, cell polarity and adhesion in electric-field-mediated motility of 3T3 fibroblasts. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:1533-45.