Vertical electric field stimulated neural cell functionality on porous amorphous carbon electrodes

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 37, 2013, Pages 9252-9263

  Jain, Shilpee ^a,b   Sharma, Ashutosh ^a   Basu, Bikramjit ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Carbon electrodes; Neural stimulation; Neuroblastoma cells; Vertical electric field

Indexed keywords

CARBON ELECTRODE; CHARGE STORAGE CAPACITY; ELECTRIC FIELD STRENGTH; GRADIENT ELECTRIC FIELDS; NEURAL STIMULATIONS; NEUROBLASTOMA CELLS; POROUS GLASSY CARBON; VERTICAL ELECTRIC FIELDS;

AMORPHOUS CARBON; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; ELECTRODES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; GLASS MEMBRANE ELECTRODES; NEURONS; SUBSTRATES;

ELECTRIC FIELDS;

CARBON;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NERVE FIBER GROWTH; NEURITE; NEUROBLASTOMA CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROLYSIS; VERTICAL ELECTRIC FIELD;

CARBON ELECTRODES; NEURAL STIMULATION; NEUROBLASTOMA CELLS; VERTICAL ELECTRIC FIELD;

ANIMALS; CARBON; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRODES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MICE; NEUROGENESIS; NEURONS; POROSITY;

EID: 84884820715     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.057     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Basu B., Katti D.S., Kumar A. Advanced biomaterials: fundamentals, processing and applications 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.
2. McCaig C.D., Rajnicek A.M., Song B., Zhoa M. Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potential. Physiol Rev 2005, 85:943-978.
3. Robinson K.R. The response of cells to electrical fields: a review. JCB 1985, 101:2023-2027.
4. Rajnicek A.M., Robinson K.R., McCaig C.D. The direction of neurite growth in a weak dc electric field depends on the substratum: contributions of adhesivity and net surface charge. Dev Biol 1998, 203:412-423.
5. Patel N., Poo M.-M. Oreintation of neurite growth by extracellular electric fields. JNeurosci 1981, 2:483-496.
6. Chiono V., Tonda-Turo C., Ciardelli G. Artificial scaffolds for peripheral nerve reconstruction. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009, 87:173-198.
7. Kotwal A., Schmidt C.E. Electrical stimulation alters protein adsorption and nerve cell interactions with electrically conducting biomaterials. Biomaterials 2001, 22:1055-1064.
8. McCaig C.D., Song B., Rajnicek A.M. Electrical dimensions in cell science. JCell Sci 2009, 122:4267-4276.
9. Harnack D., Winter C., Meissner W., Reumb T., Kupsch A., Morgenstern R. The effects of electrode material, charge density and stimulation duration on the safety of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in rats. JNeurosci Methods 2004, 138:207-216.
10. Cogan S.F. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2008, 10:275-309.
11. Weiland J.D., Anderson D.J. Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000, 47:911-918.
12. Merrill D.R., Bikson M., Jefferys J.G.R. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. JNeurosci Methods 2005, 141:171-198.
13. Rose T.L., Robblee L.S. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodesVIII electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990, 37:1119-1120.
14. Cogan S.F., Plante T.D., Ehrlich J. Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004, 6:4153-4156.
15. Meyer R.D., Cogan S.F., Nguyen T.H., Rauh R.D. Electrodeposited iridium oxide for neural stimulation and recording electrodes. IEEE Trans Neu Sys Rehabil Eng 2001, 9:2-11.
16. Seker E., Berdichevsky Y., Begley M.R., Reed M.L., Staley K.J., Yarmush M.L. The fabrication of low-impedance nanoporous gold multiple-electrode arrays for neural electrophysiology studies. Nanotechnology 2010, 21:125504-125510.
17. Bellamkonda R.V., Pai S.B., Renaud P. Materials for neural interfaces. MRS Bull 2012, 37:557-561.
18. Nyberg T., Shimada A., Torimitsu K. Ion conducting polymer microelectrodes for interfacing with neural networks. JNeurosci Methods 2007, 160:16-25.
19. Wang K., Fishman H.A., Dai H., Harris J.S. Neural stimulation with carbon nanotubes microelectrode array. Nano Lett 2006, 6:16-25.
20. Lu Y., Li T., Zhao X., Li M., Cao Y., Yang H., et al. Electrodeposited polypyrrole/carbon nanotubes composite films electrodes for neural interfaces. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5169-5181.
21. Janders M., Egert U., Stelzle M., Nisch W. Novel thin film titanium nitride micro-electrodes with excellent charge transfer capability for cell stimulation and sensing application. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1996, 245-247.
22. Chikar J.A., Hendricks J.L., Richardson-Burns S.M., Raphael Y., Pfingst B.E., Martin D.C. The use of a dual PEDOT and RGD-functionalized alginate hydrogel coating to provide sustained drug delivery and improved cochlear implant function. Biomaterials 2012, 33:1982-1990.
23. Gabay T., Ben-David M., Kalifa I., Sorkin R., Abrams ZeR., Ben-Jacob E., et al. Electro-chemical and biological properties of carbon nanotubes based multi-electrode arrays. Nanotechnology 2007, 18:35201-35206.
24. Hughes M., Chen G.Z., Shaffer M.S.P., Fray D.J., Windle A.H. Electrochemical capacitance of a nanoporous composite of carbon nanotubes and polypyrrole. Chem Mater 2002, 14:1610-1613.
25. Rajzer I., Menaszek E., Bacakova L., Rom M., Blazewicz M. Invitro and invivo studies on biocompatibility of carbon fibres. JMater Sci Mater Med 2010, 21:2611-2622.
26. Smart S.K., Cassady A.I., Lu G.Q., Martin D.J. The biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2006, 44:1034-1047.
27. Worle-Knirsch J.M., Pulskamp K., Krug H.F. Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays. Nano Lett 2006, 6:1261-1268.
28. Magrez A., Kasas S., Salicio V., Pasquier N., Seo J.W., Celio M., et al. Cellular toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials. Nano Lett 2006, 6:1121-1125.
29. Rodil S.E., Olivares R., Arzate H., Muhl S. Biocompatibility, cytotoxicity and bioactivity of amorphous carbon films. Topics Appl Phys 2006, 100:55-75.
30. Grabinski C., Hussain S., Lafdi K., Braydich-Stolle L., Schlager J. Effect of particle dimension on biocompatibility of carbon nanomaterials. Carbon 2007, 45:2828-2835.
31. Jain S., Sharma A., Basu B. Invitro cytocompatibility assessment of amorphous carbon structures using neuroblastoma and Schwann cells. JBiomed Mater Res Part B 2013, 101B:530-531.
32. Kulkarni M.M., Sharma C.S., Sharma A., Kalmodia S., Basu B. Multiscale micro-patterned polymeric and carbon substrates derived from buckled photoresist films: fabrication and cytocompatibility. JMater Sci 2012, 47:3867-3875.
33. Teixidor G.T., Gorkin R.A., Tripathi P.P., Bisht G.S., Kulkarni M., Maiti T.K., et al. Carbon microelectromechanical systems as a substratum for cell growth. Biomed Mater 2008, 3:34116-34124.
34. Jenkins G.M., Ila D., Maleki H. Production of heart valves from glassy polymeric carbon. MRS Proc 1995, 394. 394-181.
35. Ashfaq M., Singh S., Sharma A., Verma N. Cytotoxic evaluation of the hierarchical web of carbon micro-nanofibers. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013, 52:4672-4682.
36. Jain S., Webster T.J., Sharma A., Basu B. Intracellular reactive oxidative stress, cell proliferation and apoptosis of Schwann cells on carbon nanofibrous substrates. Biomaterials 2013, 34:4891-4901.
37. Ai Y., Beskok A., Gauthier D.T., Joo S.W., Qian S. DC electrokinetic transport of cylindrical cells in straight microchannels. Biomicrofluidics 2009, 3:44110-44126.
38. Hu N., Yang J., Yin Z.-Q., Ai Y., Qian S., Svir I.B., et al. Ahigh-throughput dielectrophoresis-based cell electrofusion microfluidic device. Electrophoresis 2011, 32:2488-2495.
39. Patel S., Showers D., Vedantam P., Tzeng T.-R., Qian S., Xuan X. Microfluidic separation of live and dead yeast cells using reservoir-based dielectrophoresis. Biomicrofluidics 2012, 6:34102-34114.
40. Hu N., Yang J., Qian S., Joo S.W., Zheng X. Acell electrofusion microfluidic device integrated with 3D thin-film microelectrode arrays. Biomicrofluidics 2011, 5:34121-34133.
41. Fowler M.J., Flaskos J., McLean W.G., Hargreaves A.J. Effects of neuropathic and non-neuropathic isomers of tricresyl phosphate and their microsomal activation on the production of axon-like processes by differentiating mouse N2a neuroblastoma cells. JNeurochem 2001, 76:671-678.
42. Rahaman M.S.A., Ismail A.F., Mustafa A. Areview of heat treatment on polyacrylonitrile fiber. Polym Degrad Stab 2007, 92:1421-1432.
43. Ko T.H., Chen C.Y. Raman spectroscopic study of the microstructure of carbon films developed from cobalt chloride-modified polyacrylonitrile. JAppl Polym Sci 1999, 71:2219-2225.
44. Sadezky A., Muckenhuber H., Grothe H., Niessner R., Poschl U. Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials: spectral analysis and structural information. Carbon 2005, 43:1731-1742.
45. Armstrong R.D., Firman E., Thirsk H.R. The A.C. impedance of complex electrochemical reactions. Faraday Discuss Chem Soc 1973, 56:244-263.
46. Bradke F. The role of local actin instability in axon formation. Science 1999, 283:1931-1934.
47. Khung Y.L., Barritt G., Voelcker N.H. Using continuous porous silicon gradients to study the influence of surface topography on the behaviour of neuroblastoma cells. Exp Cell Res 2008, 314:789-800.
48. Rutten W.L.C. Selective electrical interfaces with the nervous system. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2002, 4:407-452.
49. Wang K. Acarbon nanotube microelectrode array for neural stimulation 2006, Stanford University.
50. Valic B., Golzio M., Pavlin M., Schatz A., Faurie C., Gabriel B., et al. Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment. Eur Biophys J 2003, 32:519-528.
51. Hinkle L., McCaig C.D., Robinson K.R. The direction of growth of differentiating neurones and myoblasts from frog embryos in an applied electric field. JPhysiol 1981, 314:121-135.
52. Munoz J.P., Sanchez J.R., Maccioni R.B. Regulation of p27 in the process of neuroblastoma N2A differentiation. JCell Biochem 2003, 89:539-549.
53. Tan J., Town T., Mori T., Obregon D., Wu Y., DelleDonne A., et al. CD40 is expressed and functional on neuronal cells. EMBO J 2002, 21:643-652.
54. Flaskos J., McLean W.G., Fowler M.J., Hargreaves A.J. Tricresyl phosphate inhibits the formation of axon-like processes and disrupts neurofilaments in cultured mouse N2a and rat PC12 cells. Neurosci Lett 1998, 242:101-104.
55. Mitra J., Jain S., Sharma A., Basu B. Patterned growth and differentiation of neural cells on polymer derived carbon structures invitro. Carbon 2013, in Press.
56. Chen C.-H., Su H.-C., Chuang S.-C., Yen S.-J., Chen Y.-C., Lee Y.-T., et al. Hydrophilic modification of neural microelectrode arrays based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology 2010, 21:485501-485510.
57. Nguyen-Vu T.D.B., Chen H., Cassell A.M., Andrews R., Meyyappan M., Li J. Vertically aligned carbon nanofiber arrays: an advance toward electrical-neural interfaces. Small 2006, 2.
58. Schmidt C.E., Shastri V.R., Vacanti J.P., Langer R. Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:8948-8953.
59. Heo C., Yoo J., Lee S., Jo A., Jung S., Yoo H., et al. The control of neural cell-to-cell interactions through non-contact electrical field stimulation using graphene electrodes. Biomaterials 2011, 32:19-27.