Difference not deficit: Reconceptualizing mathematical learning disabilities

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 351-396

  Lewis, Katherine E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Dyscalculia; Fractions; Learning disability; Mathematical learning disability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901411491     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.45.3.0351     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (70)

1. Andersson, U. (2010). Skill development in different components of arithmetic and basic cognitive functions: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study of children with different types of learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 115-134. doi:10.1037/a0016838
2. Armstrong, B. E., & Larson, C. N. (1995). Students' use of part-whole and direct comparison strategies for comparing partitioned rectangles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 2-19. doi: 10.2307/749225
3. Ashcraft, M. H., Krause, J. A., & Hopko, D. R. (2007). Is math anxiety a mathematical learning disability? In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 329-348). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
4. Ball, D. L. (1993). Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 157-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Baglieri, S., Valle, J. W., Connor, D. J., & Gallagher, D. J. (2011). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 267-278. doi: 10.1177/0741932510362200
6. Bailey, D. H., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(3), 447-455. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004
7. Barron, B. J. S., Pea, R., & Engle, R. A. (2013). Advancing understanding of collaborative learning with data derived from video records. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O'Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 203-219). New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Butterworth, B., & Reigosa-Crespo, V. (2007). Information processing deficits in dyscalculia. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 65-81). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
9. Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. InC. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10. Chatterji, M. (2005). Achievement gaps and correlates of early mathematics achievement: Evidence from the ECLS K-first grade sample. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(46). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/ v13n46/
11. Cole, M., Levitin, K., & Luria, A. (2006). The autobiography of Alexander Luria. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. De Smedt, B., & Gilmore, C. K. (2011). Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 278-292. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.003
13. Diversity in Mathematics Education Center for Learning and Teaching. (2007). Culture, race, power, and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 405-433). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
14. Empson, S. B. (2001). Equal sharing and the roots of fraction equivalence. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(7), 421-425. doi:10.2307/41197637
15. Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16. Gallagher, D. J. (2004). Entering the conversation: The debate behind the debates in special education. In D. J. Gallagher, L. Heshusius, R. P. lano, & T. M. Skrtic (Eds.), Challenging orthodoxy in special education: Dissenting voices (pp. 3-26). Denver, CO: Love.
17. Geary, D. C. (2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 130-133. doi:10.1016 /j.lindif.2009.10.008
18. Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. K. (2005). Learning disabilities in arithmetic and mathematics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 253-267). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
19. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104( 1), 206-223. doi:10.1037/a0025398
20. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2008). Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 277-299. doi:10.1080/87565640801982361 (Pubitemid 351883457)
21. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293-304. doi: 10.1177/0022 2194050380040301
22. Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child's mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
24. Gutstein, E., & Mack, N. K. (1998). Learning about teaching for understanding through the study of tutoring. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(4), 441-465. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00005-X (Pubitemid 128338871)
25. Gutiérrez, K. D., Morales, P. Z., & Martinez, D. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 212-245. doi: 10.3102/0091732X08328267
26. Halle, T., Hair, E., Wandner, L., McNamara, M., & Chien, N. (2012). Predictors and outcomes of early versus later English language proficiency among English language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.004
27. Hanich, L. B., Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 615-626. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.615
28. Hecht, S. A., & Vagi, K. J. (2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 843-859. doi:10.1037/a0019824
29. Hiebert, J. (1988). A theory of developing competence with written mathematical symbols. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(3), 333-355. doi: 10.1007/BF00312451
30. Hunting, R. P., & Davis, G. E. (1991). Dimensions of young children's conceptions of the fraction one half. In R. P. Hunting & G. Davis (Eds.), Early fraction learning (pp. 27-53). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3194-3-3
31. Hunting, R. P., Davis, G., & Bigelow, J. C. (1991). Higher order thinking in young children's engagements with a fraction machine. In R. P. Hunting & G. Davis (Eds.), Early fraction learning (pp. 73-90). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3194-3-5
32. Jaworski, B. (1998). The centrality of the researcher: Rigor in a constructivist inquiry into mathematics teaching. In A. Teppo (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in mathematics education (JRME Monograph No. 9) (pp. 112-127). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, doi: 10.2307/749950
33. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Nabors Oláh, L., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77(1), 153-175. doi:10.1111/j.l467-8624.2006.00862.x (Pubitemid 43412369)
34. Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1995). Equivalent fractions: Their difficulty and educational implications. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(4), 365-378. doi:10.1016/0732-3123(95)90035-7
35. Kaput, J. J. (1987). Towards a theory of symbol use in mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 159-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Lamon, S. J. (1996). The development of unitizing: Its role in children's partitioning strategies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 170-193. doi: 10.2307/749599
37. Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 629-668). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
38. Landerl, K., & Kölle, C. (2009). Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 546-565. doi:10.1016/j. jecp.2008.12.006
39. Lewis, K. E. (2011). Toward a reconceptualization of mathematical learning disabilities: A focus on difference rather than deficit (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3555785)
40. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 16-32. doi: 10.2307/749454
42. Mack, N. K. (1993). Learning rational numbers with understanding: The case of informal knowledge. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 85-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Mack, N. K. (1995). Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(5), 422-441. doi:10.2307/749431
44. Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In D. B. Berch, & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29-48). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
45. Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Devlin, K. T. (2008). Parts and "holes": Gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities. Developmental Science, 11(5), 681-691. doi:10.1111/j. 1467-7687.2008.00717.X
46. Mazzocco, M. M. M., Devlin, K. T., & McKenney, S. J. (2008). Is it a fact? Timed arithmetic performance of children with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) varies as a function of how MLD is defined. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 318-344. doi:10.1080/87565640801982403 (Pubitemid 351883449)
47. Mazzocco, M. M. M., Myers, G. F., Lewis, K. E., Hanich, L. B., & Murphy, M. M. (2013). Limited knowledge of fraction representations differentiates middle school students with mathematics learning disability (dyscalculia) versus low mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 115(2), 371-387. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.005
48. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269-305). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511625510.011
49. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324-348. doi:10.1525/aeq.1995.26. 3.05x0936z
50. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: Final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/ mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf
51. Ni, Y. (2001) . Semantic domains of rational numbers and the acquisition of fraction equivalence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 400-417. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1072
52. Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D.,...Zorzi, M. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33-41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
53. Post, T. R., Wachsmuth, I., Lesh, R., & Behr, M. J. (1985). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A cognitive analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 18-36. doi: 10.2307/748970
54. Sawyer, R. K. (2013). Qualitative methodologies for studying small groups. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O'Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 126-148). New York, NY: Routledge.
55. Saxe, G. B., Earnest, D., Sitabkhan, Y., Haidar, L. C., Lewis, K. E., & Zheng, Y. (2010). Supporting generative thinking about the integer number line in elementary mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 433-414. doi:10.1080/07370008.2010.511569
56. Saxe, G. B., Taylor, E. V., McIntosh, C., & Gearhart, M. (2005). Representing fractions with standard notation: A developmental analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 137-157. (Pubitemid 40346015)
57. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94. doi:10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7
58. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., III, & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 55-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and the pitfalls of reification: The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2-3), 191-228. doi:10.1007/BF01273663
60. Shalev, R. S. (2007). Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco(Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 49-60). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
61. Sherry, M. (2006). If I only had a brain: Deconstructing brain injury. New York, NY: Routledge.
62. Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M.,Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691-697. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440101
63. Steffe, L. P. (2003). Fractional commensurate, composition, and adding schemes: Learning trajectories of Jason and Laura: Grade 5 [Special Issue: Fractions, Ratio and Proportional Reasoning, Part B]. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(3), 237-295. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00022-1
64. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Swanson, H, L. (2007). Cognitive aspects of math disabilities. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco(Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 133-146). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
66. Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature.Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 249-274. doi: 10.3102/00346543076002249
67. von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Preliminaries to any theory of representation. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 215-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). Introduction: Fundamental problems of defectology. In R. W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 2. The fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (J. E. Knox & C. Stevens, Trans.). New York, NY: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1929)
70. Zentall, S. S. (2007). Math performance of students with ADHD: Cognitive and behavioral contributors and interventions. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp.219-244). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.