Heterografting with nonself rootstocks induces genes involved in stress responses at the graft interface when compared with autografted controls

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2473-2481

  Cookson, S J ^a   Clemente Moreno, M J ^a   Hevin, C ^a   Nyamba Mendome, L Z ^a   Delrot, S ^b   Magnin, N ^c   Trossat Magnin, C ^b   Ollat, N ^a  

^a Bordeaux Sciences Agro   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c BORDEAUX SCIENCES AGRO   (France)

Author keywords

Gene expression; graft interface; grafting; grapevine; rootstock; stress response

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

BREEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; PROCEDURES; VITIS;

BREEDING; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; VITIS;

EID: 84901397785     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru145     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bahar E, Korkutal I, Carbonneau A, Akcay G. 2010. Using magnetic resonance imaging technique (MRI) to investigate graft connection and its relation to reddening discoloration in grape leaves. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 8, 293-297.
2. Bomblies K. 2009. Too much of a good thing? Hybrid necrosis as a by-product of plant immune system diversification. Botany 87, 1013-1022.
3. Bomblies K, Lempe J, Epple P, Warthmann N, Lanz C, Dangl JL, Weigel D. 2007. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biology 5, 1962-1972.
4. Bomblies K, Weigel D. 2007. Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 382-393.
5. Browse J. 2009. Jasmonate passes muster: a receptor and targets for the defense hormone. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60, 183-205.
6. Cookson SJ, Moreno MJC, Hevin C, Mendome LZN, Delrot S, Trossat-Magnin C, Ollat N. 2013. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signalling, and secondary metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 2997-3008.
7. Cookson SJ, Ollat N. 2013. Grafting with rootstocks induces extensive transcriptional re-programming in the shoot apical meristem of grapevine. BMC Plant Biology 13, 147.
8. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang ZH, Su Z. 2010. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Research 38, W64-W70.
9. Filler DM, Luby JJ, Ascher PD. 1994a. Incongruity in the interspecific crosses of Vitis L reproductive expression in the F1 progeny. Euphytica 78, 155-164.
10. Filler DM, Luby JJ, Ascher PD. 1994b. Incongruity in the interspecific crosses of Vitis L morphological abnormalities in the F-2 progeny. Euphytica 78, 227-237.
11. Gregory PJ, Atkinson CJ, Bengough AG, Else MA, Fernandez-Fernandez F, Harrison RJ, Schmidt S. 2013. Contributions of roots and rootstocks to sustainable, intensified crop production. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 1209-1222.
12. Guan WJ, Zhao X, Hassell R, Thies J. 2012. Defense mechanisms involved in disease resistance of grafted vegetables. Hortscience 47, 164-170.
13. Haffani YZ, Silva NF, Goring DR. 2004. Receptor kinase signalling in plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 82, 1-15.
14. Jeffree CE, Yeoman MM. 1983. Development of intercellular connections between opposing cells in a graft union. New Phytologist 93, 491-509.
15. Jensen PJ, Halbrendt N, Fazio G, et al. 2012. Rootstock-regulated gene expression patterns associated with fire blight resistance in apple. BMC Genomics 13, 9.
16. Khanna-Chopra R, Dalal M, Kumar GP, Laloraya M. 1998. A genetic system involving superoxide causes F1 necrosis in wheat (T-aestivum L.). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 248, 712-715.
17. Kostoff D. 1930. Ontogeny, genetics and cytology of Nicotiana hybrids. Genetica 12, 33-118.
18. Lee JM, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, Echevarria PH, Morra L, Oda M. 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulturae 127, 93-105.
19. Leszczynski R, Byczkowski B, Jurga S, Korszun S. 2000. NMR microimaging studies of the union between stock and scion. Applied Magnetic Resonance 18, 147-153.
20. Liu Y. 2006. Historical and modern genetics of plant graft hybridization. Advances in Genetics 56, 101-129.
21. Lu DP, Wu SJ, Gao XQ, Zhang YL, Shan LB, He P. 2010. A receptorlike cytoplasmic kinase, BIK1, associates with a flagellin receptor complex to initiate plant innate immunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 496-501.
22. May P. 1994. Using grapevine rootstocks-the Australian perspective. Adelaide, Australia: Winetitles.
23. Milien M, Renault-Spilmont AS, Cookson SJ, Sarrazin A, Verdeil JL. 2012. Visualization of the 3D structure of the graft union of grapevine using X-ray tomography. Scientia Horticulturae 144, 130-140.
24. Mudge K, Janick J, Scofield S, Goldschmidt EE. 2009. A history of grafting. In: J Janick, ed, Horticultural reviews, vol. 35. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. pp 437-493.
25. Naseem M, Philippi N, Hussain A, Wangorsch G, Ahmed N, Dandekar T. 2012. Integrated systems view on networking by hormones in Arabidopsis immunity reveals multiple crosstalk for cytokinin. The Plant Cell 24, 1793-1814.
26. Nocito FF, Espen L, Fedeli C, Lancilli C, Musacchi S, Serra S, Sansavini S, Cocucci M, Sacchi GA. 2010. Oxidative stress and senescence-like status of pear calli co-cultured on suspensions of incompatible quince microcalli. Tree Physiology 30, 450-458.
27. Olmstead MA, Lang NS, Ewers FW, Owens SA. 2006. Xylem vessel anatomy of sweet cherries grafted onto dwarfing and nondwarfing rootstocks. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 131, 577-585.
28. Pina A, Errea P. 2005. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility-incompatibility. Scientia Horticulturae 106, 1-11.
29. Pina A, Errea P. 2008a. Influence of graft incompatibility on gene expression and enzymatic activity of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Plant Science 174, 502-509.
30. Pina A, Errea P. 2008b. Differential induction of phenylalanine ammonialyase gene expression in response to in vitro callus unions of Prunus spp. Journal of Plant Physiology 165, 705-714.
31. Pina A, Zhebentyayeva T, Errea P, Abbott A. 2012. Isolation and molecular characterization of cinnamate 4-hydroxylase from apricot and plum. Biologia Plantarum 56, 441-450.
32. Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RHL, Moorman AFM. 2003. Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neuroscience Letters 339, 62-66.
33. Rotter A, Camps C, Lohse M, et al. 2009. Gene expression profiling in susceptible interaction of grapevine with its fungal pathogen Eutypa lata: extending MapMan ontology for grapevine. BMC Plant Biology 9, 104.
34. Sanabria N, Goring D, Nurnberger T, Dubery I. 2008. Self/nonself perception and recognition mechanisms in plants: a comparison of selfincompatibility and innate immunity. New Phytologist 178, 503-513.
35. Smyth GK. 2005. Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: R Gentleman, V Carey, S Dudoit, R Irizarry, W Huber, eds, Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor. New York: Springer. pp 397-420.
36. Soumelidou K, Battey NH, John P, Barnett JR. 1994. The anatomy of the developing bud union and its relationship to dwarfing apple. Annals of Botany 74, 605-611.
37. Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, et al. 2004. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. The Plant Journal 37, 914-939.
38. Tippmann HF, Schlüter U, Collinge DB. 2006. Common themes in biotic and abiotic stress signalling in plants. In: JA Teixeira da Silva, ed, Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology, vol. 3. Ikenobe, Japan: Global Science Books. pp 52-67.
39. Usadel B, Nagel A, Thimm O, et al. 2005. Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of coresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiology 138, 1195-1204.
40. Van Breusegem F, Dat JF. 2006. Reactive oxygen species in plant cell death. Plant Physiology 141, 384-390.
41. Weatherhead I, Barnett JR. 1986. Development and structure of unusual xylem elements during graft union formation in Picea sitchensis L. Annals of Botany 57, 593-598.
42. Wulff BBH, Kruijt M, Collins PL, Thomas CM, Ludwig AA, De Wit P, Jones JDG. 2004. Gene shuffling-generated and natural variants of the tomato resistance gene Cf-9 exhibit different auto-necrosis-inducing activities in Nicotiana species. The Plant Journal 40, 942-956.
43. Yeoman MM, Brown R. 1976. Implications of formation of graft union for organization in intact plant. Annals of Botany 40, 1265-1276.
44. Yeoman MM, Kilpatrick DC, Miedzybrodzha MB, Gould AR. 1978. Cellular interactions during graft formation in plants, are they cognition phenomenon? Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 32, 139-160.
45. Yin H, Yan B, Sun J, et al. 2012. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 4219-4232.
46. Yoda H, Hiroi Y, Sano H. 2006. Polyamine oxidase is one of the key elements for oxidative burst to induce programmed cell death in tobacco cultured cells. Plant Physiology 142, 193-206.
47. Zheng BS, Chu HL, Jin SH, Huang YJ, Wang ZJ, Chen M, Huang JQ. 2010. cDNA-AFLP analysis of gene expression in hickory (Carya cathayensis) during graft process. Tree Physiology 30, 297-303.