Graft-union development: A delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 4219-4232

  Yin, Hao ^a   Yan, Bo ^a   Sun, Jing ^a   Jia, Pengfei ^a   Zhang, Zijuan ^a   Yan, Xiaosa ^a   Chai, Juan ^a   Ren, Zhizhong ^a   Zheng, Guochang ^a   Liu, Heng ^a  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Cell cell communication; Endomembrane system; Graft union development; Local auxin accumulation; Micrografting; Vascular reconnection

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CELL COMMUNICATION; EVALUATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PLANT;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BREEDING; CELL COMMUNICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; PLANT SHOOTS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 84866635498     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers109     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Asahina M, Iwai H, Kikuchi A, Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y, Kamada H, Satoh S. 2002. Gibberellin produced in the cotyledon is required for cell division during tissue reunion in the cortex of cut cucumber and tomato hypocotyls. Plant Physiology 129, 201-210.
2. Asahina M, Azuma K, Pitaksaringkarn W, et al. 2011. Spatially selective hormonal control of RAP2.6L and ANAC071 transcription factors involved in tissue reunion in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108, 16128-16132.
3. Bainbridge K, Bennett T, Turnbull C, Leyser O. 2006. Grafting. Methods in Molecular Biology 323, 39-44.
4. Benková E, Michniewicz M, Sauer M, Teichmann T, Seifertová D, Jürgens G, Friml J. 2003. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell 115, 591-602.
5. Brosnan CA, Mitter N, Christie M, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM, Carroll BJ. 2007. Nuclear gene silencing directs reception of longdistance mRNA silencing in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 14741-14746.
6. Caño-Delgado A, Lee JY, Demura T. 2010. Regulatory mechanisms for specification and patterning of plant vascular tissues. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 26, 605-637.
7. Chen LQ, Hou BH, Lalonde S, et al. 2010. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 468, 527-532.
8. Cheung AY, Wu HM. 2008. Structural and signaling networks for the polar cell growth machinery in pollen tubes. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59, 547-572.
9. Chikano H, Ogawa M, Ikeda Y, Koizumi N, Kusano T, Sano H. 2001. Two novel genes encoding SNF-1 related protein kinases from Arabidopsis thaliana: differential accumulation of AtSR1 and AtSR2 transcripts in response to cytokinins and sugars, and phosphorylation of sucrose synthase by AtSR2. Molecular and General Genetics 264, 674-681.
10. Christmann A, Weiler EW, Steudle E, Grill E. 2007. A hydraulic signal in root-to-shoot signalling of water shortage. The Plant Journal 52, 167-174.
11. Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, et al. 2007. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316, 1030-1033.
12. Estañ MT, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Perez-Alfocea F, Flowers TJ, Bolarin MC. 2005. Grafting raises the salt tolerance of tomato through limiting the transport of sodium and chloride to the shoot. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 703-712.
13. Fernandez-Garcia N, Carvajal M, Olmos E. 2003. Graft union formation in tomato plants, peroxidase and catalase involvement. Annals of Botany 93, 53-60.
14. Flaishman MA, Loginovsky K, Golobowich S, Lev-Yadun S. 2008. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for graft union development in homografts and heterografts. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 27, 231-239.
15. Foo E, Morris SE, Parmenter K, Young N, Wang H, Jones A, Rameau C, Turnbull CG, Beveridge CA. 2007. Feedback regulation of xylem cytokinin content is conserved in pea and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 143, 1418-1428.
16. Fragoso V, Goddard H, Baldwin IT, Kim SG. 2011. A simple and efficient micrografting method for stably transformed Nicotiana attenuata plants to examine shoot-root signaling. Plant Methods 7, 34.
17. Hauben M, Haesendonckx B, Standaert E, et al. 2009. Energy use efficiency is characterized by an epigenetic component that can be directed through artificial selection to increase yield. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106, 20109-20114.
18. Imlau A, Truernit E, Sauer N. 1999. Cell-to-cell and long-distance trafficking of the green fluorescent protein in the phloem and symplastic unloading of the protein into sink tissues. The Plant Cell 11, 309-322.
19. Johannes F, Porcher E, Teixeira FK, et al. 2009. Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genetics 5, e1000530.
20. John M, Rohrig H, Schmidt J, Walden R, Schett J. 1997. Cell signalling by oligosaccharides. Trends in Plant Science 2, 111-115.
21. Kim M, Canio W, Kessler S, Sinha N. 2001. Developmental changes due to long-distance movement of a homeobox fusion transcript in tomato. Science 293, 287-289.
22. Kollmann R, Glockmann C. 1985. Studies on graft unions. I. Plasmodesmata between cells of plants belonging to different unrelated taxa. Protoplasma 124, 224-235.
23. Kumar A, McClure B. 2010. Pollen-pistil interactions and the endomembrane system. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 2001-2013.
24. Matsumoto-Kitano M, Kusumoto T, Tarkowski P, Kinoshita-Tsujimura K, Václavíková K, Miyawaki K, Kakimoto T. 2008. Cytokinins are central regulators of cambial activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105, 20027-20031.
25. Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A, Hardcastle TJ, Dunn R, Baulcombe DC. 2010. Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 328, 872-875.
26. Mu C, Wang S, Zhang S, Pan J, Chen N, Li X, Wang Z, Liu H. 2011. Small heat shock protein LimHSP16.45 protects pollen mother cells and tapetal cells against extreme temperatures during late zygotene to pachytene stages of meiotic prophase I in David Lily. Plant Cell Reports 30, 1981-1989.
27. Napoli C. 1996. Highly branched phenotype of the petunia dadl-7 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiology 111, 27-37.
28. Oparka KJ, Roberts AG, Boevink P, Santa Cruz S, Roberts I, Pradel KS, Imlau A, Kotlizky G, Sauer N, Epel B. 1999. Simple, but not branched, plasmodesmata allow the nonspecific trafficking of proteins in developing tobacco leaves. Cell 97, 743-754.
29. Prassinos C, Ko JH, Lang G, Iezzoni AF, Han KH. 2009. Rootstock-induced dwarfing in cherries is caused by differential cessation of terminal meristem growth and is triggered by rootstockspecific gene regulation. Tree Physiology 29, 927-936.
30. Raffaele S, Bayer E, Lafarge D, et al. 2009. Remorin, a solanaceae protein resident in membrane rafts and plasmodesmata, impairs potato virus X movement. The Plant Cell 21, 1541-1555.
31. Ramon M, Rolland F, Sheen J. 2008. Sugar sensing and signaling. The Arabidopsis Book 6, 1-22.
32. Reinders J, Wulff BB, Mirouze M, Marí-Ordóñez A, Dapp M, Rozhon W, Bucher E, Theiler G, Paszkowski J. 2009. Compromised stability of DNA methylation and transposon immobilization in mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes. Genes & Development 23, 939-950.
33. + accumulation in two wild populations of Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 2, e210.
34. Sauer M, Balla J, Luschnig C, Wisniewska J, Reinöhl V, Friml J, BenkováE. 2006. Canalization of auxin flow by Aux/IAA-ARFdependent feedback regulation of PIN polarity. Genes & Development 20, 2902-2911.
35. Scarpella E, Barkoulas M, Tsiantis M. 2009. Control of leaf and vein development by auxin. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2, a001511.
36. Schilmiller AL, Howe GA. 2005. Systemic signaling in the wound response. Current Opinon in Plant Biology 8, 369-377.
37. Seo PJ, Park JM, Kang SK, Kim SG, Park CM. 2011. An Arabidopsis senescence-associated protein SAG29 regulates cell viability under high salinity. Planta 233, 189-200.
38. Sigüenza C, Schochow M, Turini T, Ploeg A. 2005. Use of Cucumis metuliferus as a rootstock for melon to manage Meloidogyne incognita. Journal of Nematology 37, 276-280.
39. Stegemann S, Bock R. 2009. Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts. Science 324, 649-651.
40. Surpin M, Raikhel N. 2004. Traffic jams affect plant development and signal transduction. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 5, 100-109.
41. Thatcher LF, Manners JM, Kazan K. 2009. Fusarium oxysporum hijacks COI1-mediated jasmonate signaling to promote disease development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 58, 927-939.
42. Thomas CL, Bayer EM, Ritzenthaler C, Fernandez-Calvino L, Maule AJ. 2008. Specific targeting of a plasmodesmal protein affecting cell-to-cell communication. PLoS Biology 6, e7.
43. Truernit E, Bauby H, Dubreucq B, Grandjean O, Runions J, Barthélémy J, Palauqui JC. 2008. High-resolution whole-mount imaging of three-dimensional tissue organization and gene expression enables the study of phloem development and structure in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20, 1494-1503.
44. Tsukaya H, Naito S, Rédei GP, Komeda Y. 1993. A new class of mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana, acaulis1, affecting the development of both inflorescences and leaves. Development 118, 751-764.
45. Turnbull CG, Booker JP, Leyser HM. 2002. Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 32, 255-262.
46. Wang XY, Guo GQ, Nie XW, Zheng GC. 1998. Cytochemical localization of cellulase activity in pollen mother cells of David Lily during meiotic prophase I and its relation to secondary formation of plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 204, 128-138.
47. 2+-decoding signaling network, function and perspectives. New Phytologist 184, 517-528.
48. Xia Y, Suzuki H, Borevitz J, Blount J, Guo Z, Patel K, Dixon RA, Lamb C. 2004. An extracellular aspartic protease functions in Arabidopsis disease resistance signaling. EMBO Journal 23, 980-988.
49. Zhou Y, Zhou J, Huang L, Ding X, Shi K, Yu J. 2009. Grafting of Cucumis sativus onto Cucurbita ficifolia leads to improved plant growth, increased light utilization and reduced accumulation of reactive oxygen species in chilled plants. Journal of Plant Research 122, 529-540.