Distinguishing neurocognitive processes reflected by P600 effects: Evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Regel, Stefanie ^a   Meyer, Lars ^a   Gunter, Thomas C ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; SEMANTICS; BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; BRAIN WAVES; COGNITION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 84901366177     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096840     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychophysiology 62: 621-647.
2. Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 463.
3. Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307: 161-163. (Pubitemid 14132900)
4. Van Petten CK, Kutas M (1990) Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition: 380-393.
5. Kutas M, Van Petten CK, Kluender R (2006) Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994-2005). In: Gernsbacher MA, editor. Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press. 659-724.
6. Gouvea AC, Phillips C, Kazanina N, Poeppel D (2010) The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes 25: 149-188.
7. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ (1992) Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31: 785-806.
8. Neville HJ, Nicol JL, Barss A, Forster KI, Garrettdew MF (1991) Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3: 151-165.
9. Friederici AD, Meyer M (2004) The brain knows the difference: Two types of grammatical violations. Brain Research 1000: 72-77. (Pubitemid 38446491)
10. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ, Swinney DA (1994) Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20: 786-803.
11. Hagoort P (2003) How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage 20: S18-S29.
12. Rossi S, Gugler MF, Hahne A, Friederici AD (2005) When word category information encounters morphosyntax: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters 384: 228-233. (Pubitemid 40836005)
13. Gunter TC, Stowe LA, Mulder G (1997) When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology 34: 660-676. (Pubitemid 27514920)
14. Friederici AD, Hahne A, Saddy D (2002) Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31: 45-63. (Pubitemid 41462094)
15. Kaan E, Harris A, Gibson E, Holcomb P (2000) The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 159-201. (Pubitemid 30353507)
16. Holle H, Obermeier C, Schmidt-Kassow M, Friederici AD, Ward J, et al. (2012) Gesture facilitates the syntactic analysis of speech. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 74.
17. Friederici AD (2002) Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 78-84.
18. Coulson S, King JW, Kutas M (1998) Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 13: 21.
19. Frisch S, Kotz SA, von Cramon DY, Friederici AD (2003) Why the P600 is not just a P300: the role of the basal ganglia. Clinical Neurophysiology 114: 336-340. (Pubitemid 36136106)
20. Osterhout L, Hagoort P (1999) A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language and Cognitive Processes 14: 1-14.
21. Brouwer H, Fitz H, Hoeks J (2012) Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research 1446: 127-143.
22. Gunter TC, Friederici AD, Schriefers H (2000) Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 556-568. (Pubitemid 30609383)
23. Kuperberg GR, Sitnikova T, Caplan D, Holcomb PJ (2003) Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research 17: 117-129. (Pubitemid 36577547)
24. Nieuwland MS, Van Berkum JJA (2005) Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research 24: 691-701. (Pubitemid 41133301)
25. Kim A, Osterhout L (2005) The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 52: 205-225. (Pubitemid 40233696)
26. van Herten M, Kolk HHJ, Chwilla DJ (2005) An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research 22: 241-255. (Pubitemid 40093916)
27. Kolk HHJ, Chwilla DJ, van Herten M, Oor PJW (2003) Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language 85: 1-36. (Pubitemid 36390142)
28. Juottonen K, Revonsuo A, Lang H (1996) Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms (LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effect. Cognitive Brain Research 4: 99-107. (Pubitemid 26308882)
29. Kemmerer D, Weber-Fox C, Price K, Zdanczyk C, Way H (2007) Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order. Brain and Language 100: 238-256. (Pubitemid 46400815)
30. Kuperberg GR, Holcomb PJ, Sitnikova T, Greve D, Dale AM, et al. (2003) Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15: 272-293. (Pubitemid 36293136)
31. Münte TF, Heinze H-J, Matzke M, Wieringa BM, Johannes S (1998) Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia 36: 217-226. (Pubitemid 28209952)
32. Salmon N, Pratt H (2002) A comparison of sentence- and discourse-level semantic processing: An ERP study. Brain and Language 83: 367-383. (Pubitemid 36027072)
33. Regel S, Gunter TC, Coulson S (2010) The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony. Brain Research 1311: 121-135.
34. Regel S, Gunter TC, Friederici AD (2011) Isn't it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 277-293.
35. Coulson S, Van Petten CK (2002) Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition 30: 958-968. (Pubitemid 35303481)
36. Spotorno N, Cheylus A, Van Der Henst J-B, Noveck IA (2013) What's behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing. Plos One 8: 1-10.
37. Coulson S, Kutas M (2001) Getting it: Human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters 316: 71-74. (Pubitemid 34001663)
38. Fischler I, Bloom PA, Childers DG, Achariyapaopan T, Perry NW (1983) Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology 20: 400-409. (Pubitemid 14229108)
39. Burkhardt P (2006) Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language 98: 159-168.
40. Hoeks JCJ, Stowe LA, Doedens G (2004) Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 19: 59-73. (Pubitemid 38221548)
41. Kuperberg GR (2007) Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 1146: 23-49.
42. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I, Schlesewsky M (2008) An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews 59: 55-73.
43. Kolk HHJ, Chwilla DJ (2007) Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language 100: 257-261.
44. Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH (1999) Event related EEG-MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology 110: 1842-1857. (Pubitemid 29454610)
45. Roehm D, Klimesch W, Haider H, Doppelmayr M (2001) The role of theta and alpha oscillations for language comprehension in the human electroencephalogram. Neuroscience Letters 310: 137-140. (Pubitemid 32822823)
46. Bastiaansen MC, van Berkum JJ, Hagoort P (2002) Syntactic processing modulates the theta rhythm of the human EEG. NeuroImage 17: 1479-1492. (Pubitemid 35333867)
47. Meyer L, Obleser J, Friederici AD (2013) Left parietal alpha enhancement during working memory-intensive sentence processing. Cortex 49: 711-721.
48. Klimesch W (2012) Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16: 606-617.
49. Hald LA, Bastiaansen MC, Hagoort P (2006) EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing. Brain and Language 96: 90-105. (Pubitemid 41654411)
50. Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen M, Petersson KM (2004) Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304: 438-441. (Pubitemid 38495939)
51. Osterhout L, Mobley LA (1995) Event-Related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 739.
52. Friederici AD, Pfeifer E, Hahne A (1993) Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research 1: 183-192. (Pubitemid 23288135)
53. Friederici AD, Weissenborn J (2007) Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research 1146: 50-58. (Pubitemid 46551008)
54. Otten LJ, Rugg MD (2004) Interpreting event-related brain potentials. In: Handy TC, editor. Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook. Cambridge: MIT Press. 3-16.
55. Taylor WL (1953) "Cloze Procedure": a new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly 30: 415-433.
56. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM (2011) FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience.
57. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping 8: 194-208.
58. Vasey MW, Thayer JF (1987) The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology 24: 479-486. (Pubitemid 17114214)
59. Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E (2004) Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology 41: 665-678. (Pubitemid 39295493)
60. Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG-and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 164: 177-190. (Pubitemid 46950991)
61. Lee O, A ML (1995) Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 739-773.
62. Bastiaansen MC, Van der Linden M, ter Keurs M, Dijkstra T, Hagoort P (2005) Theta responses are involved in lexico-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 530-541. (Pubitemid 40364539)
63. Kaan E, Swaab TY (2003) Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15: 98-110. (Pubitemid 36106266)
64. Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1983) Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition 11: 539-550.
65. Hagoort P, Brown CM (2000) ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia 38: 1531-1549. (Pubitemid 30440624)
66. Molinaro N, Vespignania F, Job R (2008) A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: An ERP study on agreement violations. Brain Research 1228: 161-176.
67. Federmeier KD, Mai H, Kutas M (2005) Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivity to sentential constraint. Memory and Cognition 33: 871-886. (Pubitemid 46202395)
68. Wlotko EW, Federmeier KD (2007) Finding the right word: Hemispheric assymetries in the use of sentence context information. Neuropsychologia 45: 3001-3014. (Pubitemid 47374733)
69. Grice PH (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL, editors. Speech acts: Syntax and semantics. New York: Academic Press. 41-58.
70. Coulson S, Van Petten CK (2007) A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension?: ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research 1146: 128-145. (Pubitemid 46566433)