Isn't it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 277-293

  Regel, Stefanie ^a   Gunter, Thomas C ^a   Friederici, Angela D ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650100112     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21411     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2000). Irony as a game of implicitness: Acoustic profiles of ironic communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 275-311.
2. Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793-826.
3. Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. International Journal of Humor Research, 2, 243-260.
4. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59, 55-73.
5. Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400 - Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34-44.
6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language useage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56-311). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cornejo, C., Simonetti, F., Aldunate, N., Ibanez, A., Lopez, V., & Melloni, L. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence of different interpretative strategies in irony comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 411-430.
8. Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21.
9. Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316, 71-74. (Pubitemid 34001663)
10. Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2004). Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 275-288. (Pubitemid 38520022)
11. Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 30, 958-968. (Pubitemid 35303481)
12. Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2007). A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension?: ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research, 1146, 128-145.
13. Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of literal and non-literal meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1579-1599.
14. Dien, J., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2005). Application of repeated measures ANOVA to high density ERP datasets: A review and tutorial. In T. C. Handy (Ed.), Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise...Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513.
16. Ericsson, E., Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Rudolfsson, T., & Sandstrom, G. (2008). Is the P600/SPS affected by the richness of semantic content? A linguistic ERP study in Swedish. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 1-9.
17. Ferretti, T. R., Schwint, C. A., & Katz, A. N. (2007). Electrophysiological and behavioral measures of the influence of literal and figurative contextual constraints on proverb comprehension. Brain and Language, 101, 38-49.
18. Fischler, I., & Bradley, M. (2006). Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: Words, phrases, and task effects. Understanding Emotions, 156, 185-203. (Pubitemid 44466045)
19. Friederici, A. D., Gunter, T. C., Hahne, A., & Mauth, K. (2004). The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. NeuroReport, 15, 165-169. (Pubitemid 41614992)
20. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 45-63. (Pubitemid 41462094)
21. Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Frisch, S. (1999). Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory and Cognition, 27, 438-453. (Pubitemid 29239536)
22. Friederici, A. D., & Weissenborn, J. (2007). Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research, 1146, 50-58.
23. Gibbs, R. W. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3-15.
24. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). Figurative thought and figurative language. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 411-446). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Gibbs, R. W. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 457-486.
26. Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183-206.
27. Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 919-929.
28. Giora, R. (2002). Literal versus figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 487-506.
29. Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 241-257.
30. Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
31. Grice, P. H. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556-568.
33. Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34, 660.
34. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439.
35. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530. (Pubitemid 30440623)
36. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194-205.
37. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 339-356.
38. Herbert, C., Junghofer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45, 487-498.
39. Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 59-73.
40. Holtgraves, T. M. (2001). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159.
42. Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148, 138-148.
43. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when: Using word-level and clause-level ERPs to monitor working-memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
44. Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Winkler, I., & Junghofer, M. (2009). Emotion and attention in visual word processing: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 80, 75-83.
45. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.
46. Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85, 1-36.
47. Kuperberg, G. R., Holcomb, P. J., Sitnikova, T., Greve, D., Dale, A. M., & Caplan, D. (2003). Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 272-293.
48. Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117-129.
49. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463.
50. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
51. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161.
52. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. K., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994-2005). In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 659-724). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Landi, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). An electrophysiological investigation of semantic and phonological processing in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Brain and Language, 102, 30-45.
54. Lattner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Talker's voice and gender stereotype in human auditory sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 339, 191-194.
55. Laurent, J.-P., Denhieres, G., Passerieux, C., Iakimova, G., & Hardy-Bayle, M.-C. (2006). On understanding idiomatic language: The salience hypothesis assessed by ERPs. Brain Research, 1068, 151-160.
56. Martin-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., Casado, P., Munoz, F., & Fernandez-Frias, C. (2004). Electrophysiological evidence of an early effect of sentence context in reading. Biological Psychology, 65, 265-280.
57. Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2005). Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 691-701.
58. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 786.
59. Osterhout, L., McKinnon, R., Bersick, M., & Corey, V. (1996). On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 507-526.
60. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739.
61. Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 74, 374-388.
62. Pexman, P. M. (2008). It's fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 286-290.
63. Pritchard, W. S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 506-540.
64. Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F.-H., & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 55, 293-316.
65. Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 483-495.
66. Rockwell, P. (2007). Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 361-369.
67. Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Canoune, H. L., Ritter, W., & Hammer, M. (1990). Multiple sources of P3b associated with different types of information. Psychophysiology, 27, 157-176.
68. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. St. George, M., Mannes, S., & Hoffman, J. E. (1994). Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 70-83.
70. Tartter, V. C., Gomes, H., Dubrovsky, B., Molholm, S., & Stewart, R. V. (2002). Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily: Evidence from N400. Brain and Language, 80, 488-509.
71. Taylor, W. L. (1953). "Cloze procedure": A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.
72. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235-248.
73. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657-671.
74. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701-718.
75. van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H. J., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 241-255.
76. van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394-417.
77. Vasey, M. W., & Thayer, J. F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479-486.
78. Vissers, C. T. W. M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Brain Research, 1106, 150-163.
79. Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38, 41-63.