It takes two to tango, a dance between the cells of origin and cancer stem cells in the Drosophila larval brain

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 28, Issue , 2014, Pages 63-69

  Janssens, Derek H ^a   Lee, Cheng Yu ^a,b,c,d  

^a Developmental   (United States)

^b Life Sciences Institute   (United States)

^c Department of Internal Medicine   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain tumor; Cancer stem cell; Cell of origin; Earmuff; Intermediate progenitor; Neuroblast; Numb; SWI SNF

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN SWI; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SNF;

BRAIN; CANCER STEM CELL; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL LINEAGE; COMPETENCE; COMPLEX FORMATION; DROSOPHILA; LARVAL DEVELOPMENT; NEUROBLAST; NONHUMAN; PROGENY; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; STEM CELL; TUMOR GROWTH; ANIMAL; BRAIN TUMOR; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTOLOGY; DISEASE MODEL; HUMAN; LARVA; METABOLISM; NEURAL STEM CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA; HUMANS; LARVA; NEOPLASTIC STEM CELLS; NEURAL STEM CELLS;

EID: 84901269418     PISSN: 10849521     EISSN: 10963634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.006     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Remke M., Ramaswamy V., Taylor M.D. Medulloblastoma molecular dissection: the way toward targeted therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2013, 25:674-681.
2. Sadanandam A., Lyssiotis C.A., Homicsko K., Collisson E.A., Gibb W.J., Wullschleger S., et al. A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy. Nat Med 2013, 19:619-625.
3. Akala O.O., Park I.K., Qian D., Pihalja M., Becker M.W., Clarke M.F. Long-term haematopoietic reconstitution by Trp53 -/- p16Ink4a -/- p19Arf -/- multipotent progenitors. Nature 2008, 453:228-232.
4. Chen W., Kumar A.R., Hudson W.A., Li Q., Wu B., Staggs R.A., et al. Malignant transformation initiated by Mll-AF9: gene dosage and critical target cells. Cancer Cell 2008, 13:432-440.
5. McCormack M.P., Young L.F., Vasudevan S., de Graaf C.A., Codrington R., Rabbitts T.H., et al. The Lmo2 oncogene initiates leukemia in mice by inducing thymocyte self-renewal. Scienc 2010, 327:879-883.
6. Youssef K.K., Van Keymeulen A., Lapouge G., Beck B., Michaux C., Achouri Y., et al. Identification of the cell lineage at the origin of basal cell carcinoma. Nat Cell Biol 2010, 12:299-305.
7. Liu C., Sage J.C., Miller M.R., Verhaak R.G., Hippenmeyer S., Vogel H., et al. Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals tumor cell of origin in glioma. Cell 2011, 146:209-221.
8. Visvader J.E. Cells of origin in cancer. Nature 2011, 469:314-322.
9. Chen J., McKay R.M., Parada L.F. Malignant glioma: lessons from genomics, mouse models, and stem cells. Cell 2012, 149:36-47.
10. Liu C., Zong H. Developmental origins of brain tumors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012, 22:844-849.
11. Schwitalla S., Fingerle A.A., Cammareri P., Nebelsiek T., Göktuna S.I., Ziegler P.K., et al. Intestinal tumorigenesis initiated by dedifferentiation and acquisition of stem-cell-like properties. Cell 2013, 152:25-38.
12. Gentles A.J., Plevritis S.K., Majeti R., Alizadeh A.A. Association of a leukemic stem cell gene expression signature with clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia. JAMA 2010, 304:2706-2715.
13. Eppert K., Takenaka K., Lechman E.R., Waldron L., Nilsson B., van Galen P., et al. Stem cell gene expression programs influence clinical outcome in human leukemia. Nat Med 2011, 17:1086-1093.
14. Guryanova O.A., Wu Q., Cheng L., Lathia J.D., Huang Z., Yang J., et al. Nonreceptor tyrosine kinase BMX maintains self-renewal and tumorigenic potential of glioblastoma stem cells by activating STAT3. Cancer Cell 2011, 19:498-511.
15. I Shats, Gatza M.L., Chang J.T., Mori S., Wang J., Rich J., Nevins J.R. Using a stem cell-based signature to guide therapeutic selection in cancer. Cancer Res 2011, 71:1772-1780.
16. Merlos-Suárez A., Barriga F.M., Jung P., Iglesias M., Céspedes M.V., Rossell D., et al. The intestinal stem cell signature identifies colorectal cancer stem cells and predicts disease relapse. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:511-524.
17. Wong D.J., Liu H., Ridky T.W., Cassarino D., Segal E., Chang H.Y. Module map of stem cell genes guides creation of epithelial cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:333-344.
18. Sarry J.E., Murphy K., Perry R., Sanchez P.V., Secreto A., Keefer C., et al. Human acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells are rare and heterogeneous when assayed in NOD/SCID/IL2Rγc-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 2011, 121:384-395.
19. Visvader J.E., Lindeman G.J. Cancer stem cells: current status and evolving complexities. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 10:717-728.
20. Magee J.A., Piskounova E., Morrison S.J. Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty. Cancer Cell 2012, 21:283-296.
21. Boyan G.S., Reichert H. Mechanisms for complexity in the brain: generating the insect central complex. Trends Neurosci 2011, 34:247-257.
22. Weng M., Lee C.Y. Keeping neural progenitor cells on a short leash during Drosophila neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011, 21:36-42.
23. Homem C.C., Knoblich J.A. Drosophila neuroblasts: a model for stem cell biology. Development 2012, 139:4297-4310.
24. Bello B.C., Izergina N., Caussinus E., Reichert H. Amplification of neural stem cell proliferation by intermediate progenitor cells in Drosophila brain development. Neural Develop 2008, 3:5.
25. Boone J.Q., Doe C.Q. Identification of Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages containing transit amplifying ganglion mother cells. Dev Neurobiol 2008, 68:1185-1195.
26. Bowman S.K., Rolland V., Betschinger J., Kinsey K.A., Emery G., Knoblich J.A. The tumor suppressors brat and numb regulate transit-amplifying neuroblast lineages in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2008, 14:535-546.
27. Haenfler J.M., Kuang C., Lee C.Y. Cortical aPKC kinase activity distinguishes neural stem cells from progenitor cells by ensuring asymmetric segregation of Numb. Dev Biol 2012, 365:219-228.
28. Xiao Q., Komori H., Lee C.Y. klumpfuss distinguishes stem cells from progenitor cells during asymmetric neuroblast division. Development 2012, 139:2670-2680.
29. Zacharioudaki E., Magadi S.S., Delidakis C. bHLH-O proteins are crucial for Drosophila neuroblast self-renewal and mediate Notch-induced overproliferation. Development 2012, 139:1258-1269.
30. Bayraktar O.A., Boone J.Q., Drummond M.L., Doe C.Q. Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages keep Prospero levels low to generate large clones that contribute to the adult brain central complex. Neural Dev 2010, 5:26.
31. Komori H., Xiao Q., McCartney B.M., Lee C.Y. Brain tumor specifies intermediate progenitor cell identity by attenuating β-catenin/Armadillo activity. Development 2014, 141.
32. Homem C.C., Reichardt I., Berger C., Lendl T., Knoblich J.A. Long-term live cell imaging and automated 4D analysis of Drosophila neuroblast lineages. PLoS One 2013, 8:e79588.
33. Weng M., Golden K.L., Lee C.Y. dFezf/Earmuff maintains the restricted developmental potential of intermediate neural progenitors in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2010, 18:126-135.
34. Berger C., Harzer H., Burkard T.R., Steinmann J., van der Horst S., Laurenson A.S., et al. FACS purification and transcriptome analysis of Drosophila neural stem cells reveals a role for Klumpfuss in self-renewal. Cell Rep 2012, 2:407-418.
35. Eroglu E., Burkard T.R., Jiang Y., Saini N., Homem C.C., Reichert H., et al. SWI/SNF complex regulates Prdm protein Hamlet to ensure lineage directionality in Drosopihla neural stem cells. Cell 2014, In press.
36. Janssens D.H., Komori H., Grbac D., Chen K., Koe C.T., Wang H., et al. dFezf/Earmuff restricts progenitor cell potential by attenuating the competence to respond to self renewal factors. Development 2014, 141:1036-1046.
37. Caussinus E., Gonzalez C. Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 2005, 37:1125-1129.
38. San-Juán B.P., Baonza A. The bHLH factor deadpan is a direct target of Notch signaling and regulates neuroblast self-renewal in Drosophila. Dev Biol 2011, 352:70-82.
39. Liu J., Sato C., Cerletti M., Wagers A. Notch signaling in the regulation of stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 2010, 92:367-409.
40. Hori K., Sen A., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Notch signaling at a glance. J Cell Sci 2013, 126:2135-2140.
41. Song Y., Lu B. Regulation of cell growth by Notch signaling and its differential requirement in normal vs. tumor-forming stem cells in Drosophila. Genes Dev 2011, 25:2644-2658.
42. Zhu S., Wildonger J., Barshow S., Younger S., Huang Y., Lee T. The bHLH repressor deadpan regulates the self-renewal and specification of Drosophila larval neural stem cells independently of notch. PLoS One 2012, 7:e46724.
43. Lee C.Y., Wilkinson B.D., Siegrist S.E., Wharton R.P., Doe C.Q. Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal. Dev Cell 2006, 10:441-449.
44. Betschinger J., Mechtler K., Knoblich J.A. Asymmetric segregation of the tumor suppressor brat regulates self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells. Cell 2006, 124:1241-1253.
45. Kandachar V., Roegiers F. Endocytosis and control of Notch signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24:534-540.
46. Giebel B., Wodarz A. Notch signaling: numb makes the difference. Curr Biol 2012, 22:133-135.
47. Couturier L., Vodovar N., Schweisguth F. Endocytosis by Numb breaks Notch symmetry at cytokinesis. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14.
48. Giagtzoglou N., Alifragis P., Koumbanakis K.A., Delidakis C. Two modes of recruitment of E(spl) repressors onto target genes. Development 2003, 130:259-270.
49. Fischer A., Gessler M. Delta-Notch- and then? Protein interactions and proposed modes of repression by Hes and Hey bHLH factors. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:4583-4596.
50. Terriente-Felix A., Li J., Collins S., Mulligan A., Reekie I., Bernard F., et al. Notch cooperates with Lozenge/Runx to lock haemocytes into a differentiation programme. Development 2013, 140:926-937.
51. Zhu S., Barshowa S., Wildonger J., Jan L.Y., Jan Y.-N. Ets transcription factor pointed promotes the generation of intermediate neural progenitors in Drosophila larval brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:20615-20620.
52. Carney T.D., Miller M.R., Robinson K.J., Bayraktar O.A., Osterhout J.A., Doe C.Q. Functional genomics identifies neural stem cell sub-type expression profiles and genes regulating neuroblast homeostasis. Dev Biol 2012, 361:137-146.
53. Neumüller R.A., Richter C., Fischer A., Novatchkova M., Neumüller K.G., Knoblich J.A. Genome-wide analysis of self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells by transgenic RNAi. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:580-593.
54. Nelson B.R., Hodge R.D., Bedogni F., Hevner R.F. Dynamic interactions between intermediate neurogenic progenitors and radial glia in embryonic mouse neocortex: potential role in Dll1-Notch signaling. J Neurosci 2013, 33:122-139.
55. Guo C., Eckler M.J., McKenna W.L., McKinsey G.L., Rubenstein J.L.R., Chen B. Fezf2 expression identifies a multipotent progenitor for neocortical projection neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Neuron 2013, 80.
56. Shimizu T., Nakazawa M., Kani S., Bae Y.-K., Shimizu T., Kageyama R., et al. Zinc finger genes Fezf1 and Fezf2 control neuronal differentiation by repressing Hes5 expression in the forebrain. Development 2010, 137:1875-1885.
57. Yang N., Dong Z., Guo S. Fezf2 regulates multilineage neuronal differentiation through activating basic helix-loop-helix and homeodomain genes in the zebrafish ventral forebrain. J Neurosci 2012, 32:10940-10948.
58. Chen L., Zheng J., Yang N., Li H., Guo S. Genomic selection identifies vertebrate transcription factor Fezf2 binding sites and target genes. J Biol Chem 2011, 286:18641-18649.
59. Shu X.-S., Li L., Ji M., Cheng Y., Ying J., Fan Y., et al. FEZF2, a novel 3p14 tumor suppressor gene, represses oncogene EZH2 and MDM2 expression and is frequently methylated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2013, 0:1-10.
60. Orkin S., Hochedlinger K. Chromatin connections to pluripotency and cellular reprogramming. Cell 2011, 145:835-850.
61. Koche R.P., Smith Z.D., Adli M., Gu H., Ku M., Gnirke A., et al. Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:96-105.
62. Kidder B.L., Palmer S., Knott J.G. SWI/SNF-Brg1 regulates self-renewal and occupies core pluripotency-related genes in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2009, 27:317-328.
63. de la Serna I.L., Ohkawa Y., Imbalzano A.N. Chromatin remodelling in mammalian differentiation: lessons from ATP-dependent remodellers. Nat Rev Genet 2006, 7:461-473.
64. Ho L., Jothi R., Ronan J.L., Cui K., Zhao K., Crabtree G.R. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is an essential component of the core pluripotency transcriptional network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 106:5187-5191.
65. Lessard J.A., Crabtree G.R. Chromatin regulatory mechanisms in pluripotency. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010, 26.
66. Reisman D., Glaros S., Thompson E.A. The SWI/SNF complex and cancer. Oncogene 2009, 28:1658-1668.
67. Kadoch C., Hargreaves D.C., Hodges C., Elias L., Ho L., Ranish J., et al. Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy. Nat Genet 2013, 45:592-601.
68. Shain A.H., Pollack J.R. The spectrum of SWI/SNF mutations, ubiquitous in human cancers. PLoS ONE 2013, 8.
69. Moshkin Y.M., Mohrmann L., van Ijcken W.F., CPV Functional differentiation of SWI/SNF remodelers in transcription and cell cycle control. Mol Cell Biol 2007, 27:651-661.
70. Vázquez M., Moore L., Kennison J. The trithorax group gene osa encodes an ARID-domain protein that genetically interacts with the brahma chromatin-remodeling factor to regulate transcription. Development 1999, 126:733-742.
71. Goardon N., Marchi E., Atzberger A., Quek L., Schuh A., Soneji S., et al. Coexistence of LMPP-like and GMP-like leukemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2011, 19:138-152.
72. Cozzio A., Passegué E., Ayton P.M., Karsunky H., Cleary M.L., Weissman I.L. Similar MLL-associated leukemias arising from self-renewing stem cells and short-lived myeloid progenitors. Genes Dev 2003, 17:3029-3035.
73. Huntly B.J., Shigematsu H., Deguchi K., Lee B.H., Mizuno S., Duclos N., et al. MOZ-TIF2, but not BCR-ABL, confers properties of leukemic stem cells to committed murine hematopoietic progenitors. Cancer Cell 2001, 6:587-596.
74. Krivtsov A.V., Twomey D., Feng Z., Stubbs M.C., Wang Y., Faber J., et al. Transformation from committed progenitor to leukaemia stem cell initiated by MLL-AF9. Nature 2006, 442:818-822.
75. Zhao Z., Zuber J., Diaz-Flores E., Lintault L., Kogan S.C., Shannon K., et al. p53 loss promotes acute myeloid leukemia by enabling aberrant self-renewal. Genes Dev 2010, 24:1389-1402.
76. Wang Y.-C., Yang J.S., Johnston R., Ren Q., Luan H., Brody T., et al. Drosophila intermediate neural progenitors produce lineage-dependent related series of diverse neurons. Development 2014, 141:1-6.