Personal values and prosocial behaviour in strategic interactions: Distinguishing value-expressive from value-ambivalent behaviours

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 554-569

  Lönnqvist, Jan Erik ^a   Verkasalo, Markku ^a   Wichardt, Philipp C ^b,c   Walkowitz, Gari ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901252919     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1976     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 3-9.
2. Arrow, K. J. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 343-362.
3. Balliet, D., Parks, C., & Joireman, J. (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 533-547.
4. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behaviour: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207-1220.
5. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403.
6. Ben-Ner, A., Amit, K., & Ori, L. (2008). Economic and hypothetical dictator game experiments: Incentive effects at the individual level. Journal of Socio-economics, 37, 1775-1784.
7. Ben-Ner, A., McCall, B. P., Stephane, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 153-170.
8. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behaviour, 10, 122-142.
9. Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values-evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 42, 759-776.
10. Brett, J. M., & Okumura, T. (1998). Inter- and intra-cultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 495-510.
11. Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420-445.
12. Easterbrook, P. J., Berlin, J. A., Gopalan, R., & Mathews, D. R. (1991). Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet, 337, 867-872.
13. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121.
14. Epstein, S. (1980). The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research. American psychologist, 35, 790-806.
15. Falk, A., & Heckman, J. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326, 535-538.
16. Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-value framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 381-391.
17. Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
18. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137-140.
19. Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., & Riedl, A. (1998). Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets. European Economic Review, 42, 1-34.
20. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178.
21. Fukuyama, F. (2001) Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22, 7-20.
22. Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. The American Economic Review, 86, 1019-1028.
23. Goerg, S. J., & Walkowitz, G. (2010). On the prevalence of framing effects across subject-pools in a two-person cooperation game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 849-859.
24. Greiner, B. (2004). The online recruitment system ORSEE 2.0-A guide for the organization of experiments in economics. Working Paper Series in Economics 10, Cologne, University of Cologne.
25. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392-404.
26. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3, 367-388.
27. Harbaugh, W. T. (1998). The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. American Economic Review, 88, 277-282.
28. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. & Tracer, D.(2005). Economic man in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioural experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 28, 795-815.
29. Jacobsen, E., & Sadrieh, A. (1996). Experimental proof for the motivational importance of reciprocity. Discussion Paper No. B-386, Bonn: University of Bonn.
30. Kang M. J., Rangel, A., Camus, M., & Camerer, C. F. (2011). Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 461-468.
31. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Kristiansen, C. M., & Hotte, A. M. (1996). Prosociality and the self: Implications for the when and how of value-attitude-behaviour relations. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values (pp. 77-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
34. Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & O'Brien, E. (2007). Audience effects on prosocialistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 28, 75-84.
35. Lönnqvist, J.-E., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., & Verkasalo, M. (in press). Rebound effect in personal values: Ingrian Finnish migrants' values two years after migration. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology. doi:10.1177/0022022113480040
36. Lönnqvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., & Walkowitz, G. (2011). It pays to pay-Big Five personality influences on co-operative behaviour in an incentivized and hypothetical prisoner's dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 300-304.
37. Lönnqvist, J.-E., Walkowitz, G., Wichardt, P., Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2009). The moderating effect of conformism values on the relations between other personal values, social norms, moral obligation, and single altruistic behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 525-546.
38. Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2003). Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behaviour. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283-308). New York: Kluwer Academic.
39. McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
40. Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.
41. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
42. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
43. Myers, L., & Sirois, M. J. (2006). Spearman correlation coefficients, differences between. In S. Kotz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (pp. 7901-7903). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
44. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 625-632.
45. Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 538-556.
46. Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539.
47. Paunonen, S. V., Haddock, G., Forsterling, F., & Keinonen, M. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17, 413-433.
48. Paunonen, S. V., Rothstein, M. G., & Jackson, D. N. (1999). Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures in personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 20, 389-405.
49. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
50. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363.
51. Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2009). Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 30-41.
52. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
53. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, England: Wiley.
54. Sagiv, L., Sverdlik, N., & Schwarz, N. (2011). To compete or to cooperate? Values' impact on perception and action in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 64-77.
55. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
56. Schwartz, S. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The Ontario symposium: The psychology of values, (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
57. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying of theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 249-288.
59. Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 161-193). London: Sage.
60. Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Culture matters: National value cultures, sources and consequences. In C.-Y. Chiu, Y. Y. Hong, S. Shavitt, & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application (pp. 127-150). New York: Psychology Press.
61. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230-255.
62. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010-1028.
63. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C.,. Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663-688.
64. Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
65. Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperimentes. In H. Sauermann (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung (pp. 136-168). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
66. Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
67. Smith, V. (1976). Experimental economics: Induced value theory. The American Economic Review, 66, 274-279.
68. Spini, D. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz Value Survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 34, 3-23.
69. Thaler, R. (1988). Anomalies: The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 195-207.
70. Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2004). Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 697-707.
71. Vauclair, C.-M., Hanke, K., Fischer, R., & Fontaine, J. R. J. (2011). The structure of human values at the culture level: A meta-analytical replication of Schwartz's value orientations using the Rokeach value survey. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 42, 186-205.
72. Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447.
73. Williams, R. M., Jr. (1968). The concept of values. In D. S. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 283-287). New York, NY: Macmillan Free Press.