Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz value survey across 21 countries

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-23

  Spini, Dario ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037247374     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022022102239152     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Aikake, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
2. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1989a). A new Incremental Fit Index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303-316.
5. Bollen, K. A. (1989b). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
6. Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese Value Surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 1009-1015.
7. Borg, I., & Lingoes, J. C. (1987). Multidimensional similarity structure analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.
8. Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Aikake's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions, Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
9. Braithwaite, V. A., & Law, H. G. (1985). Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 250-263.
10. Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley.
11. Browne, M. W. (1992). FITMOD: Point and interval estimates of measures of fit of a model [computer software].
12. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Browne, M. W., & Dutoit, S. H. C. (1992). Automated fitting of nonstandard models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 269-300.
14. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Bermúdez, J. Maslach, C., & Ruch, W. (2000). Multivariate methods for the comparison of factor structures in cross-cultural research: An illustration with the Big Five Questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 437-464.
15. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold. R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 187-212.
16. Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143-164.
17. De Groot, A., Koot, H. M., & Verhulst, F. C. (1994). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Child Behavior Checklist cross-informant syndromes. Psychological Assessment, 6, 225-230.
18. Devos, T., Spini, D., & Schwanz, S. H. (in press). Structure and conflicts of human values: the role of religiosity, political orientation, patriotism, and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology.
19. Feather, N. T. (1997). Values, national identification and favouritism towards the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 467-476.
20. Guttman, L. A. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
21. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Hofstede, G. (1982). Dimensions of national cultures. In R. Rath, H. S. Asthana, D. Sinha, & J. B. H. Sinha (Eds.), Diversity and unity in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 173-187). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
23. Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. B. Deregowski, S. Dzivrawiec, & R. C. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335-355). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
24. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede's culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach's Value Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417-433.
25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
26. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-426.
27. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). Lisrel 8.30 and Prelis 2.30. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
28. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1990). Multidimensional scaling (15th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 32(1), 53-76.
30. McDonald, R. P. (1989). An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality. Journal of Classification, 6, 97-103.
31. McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
32. Mulaik, S. A. (1987). Toward a conception of causality applicable to experimentation and causal modeling. Child Development, 58, 18-32.
33. Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 36-73.
34. Ng, S. H., Akhtar-Hosain, A. B. M., Ball, P., Bond, M. H., Hayashi, K., Lim, S. P., et al. (1982). Values in nine countries. In R. Rath, H. S. Asthana, & J. B. H. Sinha (Eds.), Diversity and unity in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 196-205). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
35. Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian structural model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163-180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Rokeach, M. (1967). Value survey. Sunnyvale, CA: Halgren Tests.
37. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press
38. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness forout-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 437-448.
39. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test and statistic and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Analysis of latent variables in developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Schmitt, M. J., Schwartz, S. H., Steyer, R., & Schmitt, T. (1995). Measurement models for the Schwartz Values Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(2), 107-121.
41. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
42. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 4, 19-45.
44. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
45. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
46. Schwartz, S. H., Lehmann, A., Melech, G., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Validation of a theory of basic human values with a new instrument in new populations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.
47. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 465-497.
48. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20(1), 92-116.
49. Spini, D. (1997). Valeurs et représentations sociales des droits de l'Homme: Une approche structurale [Values and social representations of human rights: A structural approach]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva, No 243, Switzerland.
50. Spini, D., & Doise, W. (1998). Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 603-622.
51. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.
52. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
53. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
54. Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997a). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997b). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 257-300). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Windle, M., Iwawaki, S., & Lerner, R. M. (1988). Cross-cultural comparability of temperament among Japanese and American preschool children. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 547-567.