Stephen Colbert's Civics Lesson: How Colbert Super PAC Taught Viewers About Campaign Finance

Mass Communication and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 329-353

  Hardy, Bruce W ^a   Gottfried, Jeffrey A ^b   Winneg, Kenneth M ^a   Jamieson, Kathleen Hall ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Pew Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901013730     PISSN: 15205436     EISSN: 15327825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2014.891138     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Althaus, S. L. (2012). What's good and bad in political communication research? Normative standards for evaluating media and citizen performance. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 97 - 112). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
2. Baek, Y. M., & Wojcieszak, M. E. (2009). Don't expect too much! Learning from late-night comedy and knowledge item difficulty. Communication Research, 36, 783-809.
3. Bauerly, C. L. (2011, June 30). Advisory opinion 2011-11. Federal Election Commission. Retrieved from http://www.colbertsuperPAC.com/advisory/Advisory-Opinion.pdf
4. Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96, 91 - 109.
5. Baum, M. A. (2003a). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20 (2), 173 - 190.
6. Baum, M. A. (2003b). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American Foreign Policy in a new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Baum, M. A. (2005). Talking the vote: Why presidential candidates hit the talk show circuit. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 213 - 234.
8. Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and the American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341 - 367.
9. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
10. Carr, D. (2011, August 21). Comic's PAC is more than a gag. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/22/business/media/stephen-colberts-pac-is-more-than-a-gag.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
11. Cao, X. (2008). Political comedy shows and knowledge about primary campaigns: The moderating effects of age and education. Mass Communication and Society, 11 (1), 43 - 61.
12. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 558 U.S. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf
13. Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2003). The nightly news nightmare: Networks television's coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2000. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
14. Feldman, L. (2013). Learning about politics from The Daily Show: The role of viewer orientation and processing motivations. Mass Communication & Society, 16, 586 - 607.
15. Feldman, L., & Young, D. G. (2008). Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries. Political Communication, 25, 401 - 422.
16. Garner, R. L. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha!. College Teaching, 54 (1), 177 - 180.
17. Garrett, R. S. (2011). Seriously funny: Understanding campaign finance policy through the Colbert Super PAC. Louis ULJ, 56, 711.
18. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
19. Holbert, R. L. (2005). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 436 - 453.
20. Holbert, R. L., Hmielowski, J., Jain, P., Lather, J., & Morey, A. (2011). Adding nuance to the study of political humor effects: A study of juvenalian versus horatian satire. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 187 - 211.
21. Hollander, B. A. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 402 - 415.
22. Jones, J. P., Baym, G., & Day, A. (2012). Mr. Stewart and Mr. Colbert go to Washington: Television satirists outside the box. Social Research, 79, 33 - 60.
23. Kaplan, R. M., & Pascoe, G. C. (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 61 - 65.
24. Kim, Y. M., & Vishak, J. (2008). Just laugh! You don't need to remember: The effects of entertainment media on political information acquisition and information processing in political judgment. Journal of Communication, 58, 338 - 360.
25. Kirkpatrick, D. D. (2010, January 21). Lobbyists get potent weapon in campaign ruling. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/us/politics/22donate.html
26. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (), 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
27. Lamarre, H. (2013). Breaking boundaries: When parody and reality collide: Examining the effects of Colbert's Super PAC Satire on issue knowledge and policy engagement across media formats. International Journal of Communication, 7, 394 - 413.
28. Lewis, J. (1994). The absence of narrative: Boredom and the residual power of television news. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 4, 25 - 40.
29. Machill, M., Köhler, S., & Waldhauser, M. (2007). The use of narrative structures in television news: An experiment in innovative forms of journalistic presentation. European Journal of Communication, 22, 185 - 205.
30. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2006). Mplus user's guide, fourth edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
31. Niven, D. Licthner S. R., & Amudson, D. (2003). The political content of late night comedy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 118.
32. Pew Research Center for the People, & the Press. (2007, April 15). Public knowledge of current affairs: Little change by news and information revolutions. What Americans know: 1989-2007. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2007/04/15/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions/
33. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2012, August 2). Little public awareness of outsided campaign spending boom. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/08/02/little-public-awareness-of-outside-campaign-spending-boom/
34. Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20, 149 - 171.
35. Prior, M. (2009). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. The Journal of Politics, 71, 893 - 908.
36. Prior, M. (2012). Who watches presidential debates? Measurement problems in campaign effects research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 350 - 363.
37. Slater, M., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood model: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173 - 191.
38. SpeechNow.org, et al. v. Federal Election Commission, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010). Retrieved from http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/201003/08-5223-1236837.pdf
39. Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1 - 18.
40. Williams, B., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Young, D. G. (2003, November). The counterargument-disruption model of political humor in the context of late-night programming Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL.
42. Young, D. G. (2004). Late-night comedy in election 2000: Its influence on candidate trait ratings and the moderating effects of political knowledge and partisanship. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 1 - 2.
43. Young, D. G. (2013). Entertainment, satire, and the big questions of our political world. In R. W. Glover & D. Tagliarina (Eds.) Teaching politics beyond the book: Film, texts, and new media in the classroom (pp. 179 - 198). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
44. Young, D. G. (2013a, July 1). Lighten up: How satire will make American politics relevant again. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/lighten_up.php?page=all
45. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1983). Uses and effects of humor in educational ventures. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Vol. 2. Applied Studies (pp. 173 - 193). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
46. Zillman, D., Williams, B. R., & Bryant, J., Boyton, K. R., & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Education Pyschology, 72, 170 - 180.
47. Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 6 (1), 37 - 44.