Late-night comedy as a gateway to traditional news: An analysis of time trends in news attention among late-night comedy viewers during the 2004 presidential primaries

Political Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 401-422

  Feldman, Lauren ^a,c   Young, Dannagal Goldthwaite ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gateway hypothesis; Late night comedy; News attraction; Satire

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049144763     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600802427013     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Associated Press. (2006). Jon Stewart's Oscar host role helps Comedy Central in the ratings. Associated Press, March 18.
2. Baum, M. A. (2003a). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20, 173-190.
3. Baum, M. A. (2003b). Soft news goes to war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Baum, M. A. (2005). Talking the vote: What happens when presidential candidates hit the talk show circuit? American Journal of Political Science, 49, 213-234.
5. Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and the American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341-367.
6. Baym, G. (2005). Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22, 259-276.
7. Chaffee, S. H. (1986). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), InterMedia: Interpersonal communication in a media world (3rd ed., pp. 62-80). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Chaffee, S. H., & McLeod, J. M. (1972). Individual vs. social predictors of information seeking. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 237-245.
9. Chaffee, S., & Yang, S. (1988). Communication and political socialization. In O. Ichilov (Ed.), Political socialization for democracy (pp. 137-157). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Colapinto, J. (2004, October 28). The most trusted name in news. Rolling Stone, pp. 58-64.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 51-57.
12. C-Span Newhouse School Forum. (2004, October 14). Interview with Jon Stewart by Ken Auletta from the New Yorker.
13. Delli Carpini, M., & Williams, B. (2001). Let us entertain you: Politics in the new media environment. In L. Bennett & R. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160-191). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Diebold, F. X. (2001). Elements of forecasting (2nd ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western Thompson Learning.
15. Drew, D., & Reeves, B. (1980). Children and television news. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 45-54.
16. Dutwin, D. (2000). Knowledge in the 2000 primary elections. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 572, 17-25.
17. Fox, J. A., Koloen, G., & Sahin, V. (2007). No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 213-227.
18. Gay, V. (2004, January 14). Not necessarily the news; meet the players who will influence coverage of the 2004 campaign, you might be surprised. Newsday, B6.
19. Holbert, R. L. (2005a). Intramedia mediation: The cumulative and complementary effects of news media use. Political Communication, 22, 447-462.
20. Holbert, R. L. (2005b). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 436-453.
21. Holbert, R. L., Lambe, J. L., Dudo, A. D., & Carlton, K. A. (2007). Primacy effects of The Daily Show and national TV news viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 20-38.
22. Holbert, R. L., Pillion, W., Tschida, D. A., Armfield, G. G., Kinder, K., Cherry, D. L., et al. (2003). The West Wing as endorsement of the U.S. presidency: Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication, 53, 427-447.
23. Holbrook, R. A., & Hill. T. G. (2005). Agenda-setting and priming in prime time television: Crime dramas as political cues. Political Communication, 22, 277-295.
24. Johnston, R., Blais, A., Brady, H. E., & Crete, J. (1992). Letting the people decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25. Johnston, R., & Brady, H. E. (2002). The rolling cross-section design. Electoral Studies, 21, 283-295.
26. Jones, J. (2007). "Fake" news versus "real" news as sources of political information: The Daily Show and postmodern political reality. In K. Reigert (Ed.), Politicotainment: Televison's take on the real (pp. 129-150). New York: Peter Lang.
27. Kennamer, J. D., & Chaffee, S. H. (1982). Communication of political information during early presidential primaries: Cognition, affect, and uncertainty. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 627-650). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
28. Kenski, K. (2006a). The rolling cross-section design. In D. Romer, K. Kenski, C. Adasiewicz, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Capturing campaign dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey 2000 and 2004 (pp. 68-78). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Kenski, K. (2006b). Visualizing data across the campaign. In D. Romer, K. Kenski, C. Adasiewicz, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Capturing campaign dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey 2000 and 2004 (pp. 104-120). New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
31. Mindich, D. T. Z. (2005). Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don't follow the news. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2006). Priming effects of late-night comedy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 198-210.
33. National Annenberg Election Survey (2004). Daily Show viewers knowledgeable about presidential campaign. Retrieved February 7, 2008, from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/Downloads/Political-Communication/ naes/2004-03-late-night-knowledge-2-9-21-pr.pdf
34. Niven, D., Lichter, S. R., & Amundson, D. (2003). The political content of late night comedy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(3), 118-133.
35. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2000). Audiences fragmented and skeptical: The tough job of communicating with voters. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=46
36. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004). Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political news universe. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=200
37. Pfau, M., Cho, J., & Chong, K. (2001). Communication forms in U.S. presidential campaigns: Influences on candidate perceptions and the democratic process. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(4), 88-105.
38. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Stanley, A. (2006). Leno vs. Letterman: A battle of wits with no clear winner. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/ arts/television/16stan.html?ei=5070&en=9cc024e928288b82&ex= 1181102400&pagewanted=print
40. Ten questions for Jon Stewart. (2004, September 27). Time Magazine, p. 8.
41. Young, D. G. (2004a). The Chicken or the Egg? Tracking themes in late-night jokes and trends in viewers' candidate perceptions during the primaries. Paper presentation at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL, 11-14 November.
42. Young, D. G. (2004b). Late-night comedy in election 2000: Its influence on candidate trait ratings and the moderating effects of political knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 1-22.
43. Young, D. G. (2006). Late-night comedy and the salience of the candidates' caricatured traits in the 2000 election. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 339-366.
44. Young, D. G. (2007). The Daily Show as new journalism. In J.S., Morris & J. C. Baumgartner (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age (pp. 241-259). New York: Routledge.
45. Young, D. G., & Tisinger, R. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(3), 113-134.
46. Young, D. G., Tisinger, R., Kenski, K., & Romer, D. (2006). The power of numbers: Examining subpopulations with NAES. In D. Romer, K. Kenski, C. Adasiewicz, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Capturing campaign dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey 2000 and 2004 (pp. 244-268). New York: Oxford University Press.