Transduction channels' gating can control friction on vibrating hair-cell bundles in the ear

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 20, 2014, Pages 7185-7190

  Bormuth, Volker ^a,b,c   Barral, Jérémie ^a,b,c,f   Joanny, Jean François ^a,b,c,d   Jülicher, Frank ^e   Martin, Pascal ^a,b,c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^f NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENTAMICIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BULLFROG; CHANNEL GATING; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; EAR; FORCE; FRICTION; HAIR CELL; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYSTERESIS; IONTOPHORESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; VELOCITY; VISCOELASTICITY;

AUDITORY SYSTEM; CELL MECHANICS; HAIR-BUNDLE MECHANOSENSITIVITY; MECHANOSENSITIVE CHANNELS; PROTEIN FRICTION;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM; CHELATING AGENTS; EAR; FRICTION; GENTAMICINS; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY; HEARING; HYDRODYNAMICS; ION CHANNEL GATING; ION CHANNELS; IONTOPHORESIS; RANA CATESBEIANA; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; THERMODYNAMICS; VIBRATION;

EID: 84900993130     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402556111     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gillespie PG, Mller U (2009) Mechanotransduction by hair cells: Models, molecules, and mechanisms. Cell 139(1):33-44.
2. Kozlov AS, Baumgart J, Risler T, Versteegh CP, Hudspeth AJ (2011) Forces between clustered stereocilia minimize friction in the ear on a subnanometre scale. Nature 474(7351):376-379.
3. Denk W, Webb WW, Hudspeth AJ (1989) Mechanical properties of sensory hair bundles are reflected in their Brownian motion measured with a laser differential interferometer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(14):5371-5375.
4. Kozlov AS, Andor-Ard D, Hudspeth AJ (2012) Anomalous Brownian motion discloses viscoelasticity in the ears mechanoelectrical-Transduction apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(8):2896-2901.
5. Nadrowski B, Martin P, Jlicher F (2004) Active hair-bundle motility harnesses noise to operate near an optimum of mechanosensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(33): 12195-12200.
6. Hudspeth AJ (2008) Making an effort to listen: mechanical amplification in the ear. Neuron 59(4):530-545.
7. Ashmore J, et al. (2010) The remarkable cochlear amplifier. Hear Res 266(1-2):1-17.
8. Fettiplace R, Hackney CM (2006) The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(1):19-29.
9. Barral J, Martin P (2011) The physical basis of active mechanosensitivity by the hair-cell bundle. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19(5):369-375.
10. Barral J, Dierkes K, Lindner B, Jlicher F, Martin P (2010) Coupling a sensory hair-cell bundle to cyber clones enhances nonlinear amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(18):8079-8084.
11. Gummer AW, Hemmert W, Zenner HP (1996) Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(16): 8727-8732.
12. Martin P, Bozovic D, Choe Y, Hudspeth AJ (2003) Spontaneous oscillation by hair bundles of the bullfrogs sacculus. J Neurosci 23(11):4533-4548.
13. Howard J, Hudspeth AJ (1988) Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrogs saccular hair cell. Neuron 1(3):189-199.
14. Martin P, Hudspeth AJ (1999) Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cells response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(25):14306-14311.
15. Corey DP, Hudspeth AJ (1983) Kinetics of the receptor current in bullfrog saccular hair cells. J Neurosci 3(5):962-976.
16. Tawada K, Sekimoto K (1991) Protein friction exerted by motor enzymes through a weak-binding interaction. J Theor Biol 150(2):193-200.
17. Tinevez JY, Jlicher F, Martin P (2007) Unifying the various incarnations of active hairbundle motility by the vertebrate hair cell. Biophys J 93(11):4053-4067.
18. Kozlov AS, Risler T, Hinterwirth AJ, Hudspeth AJ (2012) Relative stereociliary motion in a hair bundle opposes amplification at distortion frequencies. J Physiol 590(Pt 2): 301-308.
19. Holton T, Hudspeth AJ (1986) The transduction channel of hair cells from the bull-frog characterized by noise analysis. J Physiol 375(1):195-227.
20. Beurg M, Fettiplace R, Nam JH, Ricci AJ (2009) Localization of inner hair cell mechanotransducer channels using high-speed calcium imaging. Nat Neurosci 12(5):553-558.
21. de Gennes P-G (1979) Scaling Concepts In Polymer Physics. (Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca), pp 170, 198.
22. Ansari A, Jones CM, Henry ER, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA (1992) The role of solvent viscosity in the dynamics of protein conformational changes. Science 256(5065): 1796-1798.
23. Evans E (2001) Probing the relation between force-lifetime-And chemistry in single molecular bonds. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:105-128.
24. Braun M, et al. (2011) Adaptive braking by Ase1 prevents overlapping microtubules from sliding completely apart. Nat Cell Biol 13(10):1259-1264.
25. Evans EA, Calderwood DA (2007) Forces and bond dynamics in cell adhesion. Science 316(5828):1148-1153.
26. Bormuth V, Varga V, Howard J, Schffer E (2009) Protein friction limits diffusive and directed movements of kinesin motors on microtubules. Science 325(5942):870-873.
27. van Netten SM, Kros CJ (2000) Gating energies and forces of the mammalian hair cell transducer channel and related hair bundle mechanics. Proc Biol Sci 267(1455): 1915-1923.
28. Markin VS, Hudspeth AJ (1995) Gating-spring models of mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells of the internal ear. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 24:59-83.
29. Martin P, Mehta AD, Hudspeth AJ (2000) Negative hair-bundle stiffness betrays a mechanism for mechanical amplification by the hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(22):12026-12031.
30. Martin P, Hudspeth AJ, Jlicher F (2001) Comparison of a hair bundles spontaneous oscillations with its response to mechanical stimulation reveals the underlying active process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(25):14380-14385.
31. Nam JH, Fettiplace R (2008) Theoretical conditions for high-frequency hair-bundle oscillations in auditory hair cells. Biophys J 95(10):4948-4962.
32. Fettiplace R, Fuchs PA (1999) Mechanisms of hair cell tuning. Annu Rev Physiol 61: 809-834.
33. Martin P (2008) Active Hair-Bundle Motility of the Hair Cells of Vestibular and Auditory Organs. Active Processes and Otoacoustic Emissions in Hearing, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, eds Manley GA, Popper AN, Fay RR (Springer, New York), pp 93-143.
34. Martin P, Hudspeth AJ (2001) Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundles active response to mechanical stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(25):14386-14391.
35. Camalet S, Duke T, Jlicher F, Prost J (2000) Auditory sensitivity provided by self-Tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(7):3183-3188.
36. Duke T, Jlicher F (2008) Critical Oscillators as Active Elements in Hearing. Active Processes and Otoacoustic Emissions, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, eds Manley GA, Popper AN, Fay RR (Springer, New York), pp 63-92.
37. Ricci AJ, Kennedy HJ, Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (2005) The transduction channel filter in auditory hair cells. J Neurosci 25(34):7831-7839.
38. Ricci A (2002) Differences in mechano-Transducer channel kinetics underlie tonotopic distribution of fast adaptation in auditory hair cells. J Neurophysiol 87(4):1738-1748.
39. Lim DJ (1986) Functional structure of the organ of Corti: A review. Hear Res 22(1-3): 117-146.
40. Roth B, Bruns V (1992) Postnatal development of the rat organ of Corti. II. Hair cell receptors and their supporting elements. Anat Embryol (Berl) 185(6):571-581.
41. Kennedy HJ, Evans MG, Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (2003) Fast adaptation of mechanoelectrical transducer channels in mammalian cochlear hair cells. Nat Neurosci 6(8): 832-836.