Relative stereociliary motion in a hair bundle opposes amplification at distortion frequencies

Journal of Physiology

Volumn 590, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 301-308

  Kozlov, Andrei S ^a   Risler, Thomas ^b,c,d   Hinterwirth, Armin J ^a   Hudspeth, A J ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CELL EXPANSION; CELL MOTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORCE; FROG; HAIR CELL; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCULUS; STEREOCILIUM; STIMULATION; VESTIBULE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; FEMALE; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY, INNER; ION CHANNEL GATING; ION CHANNELS; MALE; MECHANORECEPTORS; MODELS, ANIMAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; RANA CATESBEIANA; STEREOCILIA;

EID: 84855904442     PISSN: 00223751     EISSN: 14697793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.218362     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cotton J & Grant W (2004). Computational models of hair cell bundle mechanics: II. Simplified bundle models. Hear Res 197, 105-111.
2. Crawford AC, Evans MG & Fettiplace R (1989). Activation and adaptation of transducer currents in turtle hair cells. J Physiol 419, 405-434.
3. Denk W & Webb WW (1990). Optical measurement of picometer displacements of transparent microscopic objects. Appl Optics 29, 2382-2391.
4. Denk W, Webb WW & Hudspeth AJ (1989). Mechanical properties of sensory hair bundles are reflected in their Brownian motion measured with a laser differential interferometer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86, 5371-5375.
5. Duncan RK, Eisen MD & Saunders JC (1999). Distal separation of chick cochlear hair cell stereocilia: analysis of contact-constraint models. Hear Res 127, 22-30.
6. Duncan RK & Grant JW (1997). A finite-element model of inner ear hair bundle micromechanics. Hear Res 104, 15-26.
7. Fettiplace R & Hackney CM (2006). The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells. Nature Rev 7, 19-29.
8. Fettiplace R, Ricci AJ & Hackney CM (2001). Clues to the cochlear amplifier from the turtle ear. Trends Neurosci 24, 169-175.
9. Goodyear R & Richardson G (1999). The ankle-link antigen: an epitope sensitive to calcium chelation associated with the hair-cell surface and the calycal processes of photoreceptors. J Neurosci 19, 3761-3772.
10. Howard J & Ashmore JF (1986). Stiffness of sensory hair bundles in the sacculus of the frog. Hear Res 23, 93-104.
11. Howard J & Hudspeth AJ (1988). Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Neuron 1, 189-199.
12. Hudspeth AJ (1989). How the ear's works work. Nature 341, 397-404.
13. Hudspeth AJ (1997). How hearing happens. Neuron 19, 947-950.
14. Hudspeth AJ (2008). Making an effort to listen: mechanical amplification in the ear. Neuron 59, 530-545.
15. Hudspeth AJ & Corey DP (1977). Sensitivity, polarity, and conductance change in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74, 2407-2411.
16. Jacobs RA & Hudspeth AJ (1990). Ultrastructural correlates of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's internal ear. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55, 547-561.
17. Jaramillo F, Markin VS & Hudspeth AJ (1993). Auditory illusions and the single hair cell. Nature 364, 527-529.
18. Jülicher F, Andor D & Duke T (2001). Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 9080-9085.
19. Karavitaki KD & Corey DP (2010). Sliding adhesion confers coherent motion to hair cell stereocilia and parallel gating to transduction channels. J Neurosci 30, 9051-9063.
20. Kozlov AS, Baumgart J, Risler T, Versteegh CPC & Hudspeth AJ (2011). Forces between clustered stereocilia minimize friction in the ear on a subnanometre scale. Nature 474, 376-379.
21. Kozlov AS, Risler T & Hudspeth AJ (2007). Coherent motion of stereocilia assures the concerted gating of hair-cell transduction channels. Nat Neurosci 10, 87-92.
22. LeMasurier M & Gillespie PG (2005). Hair-cell mechanotransduction and cochlear amplification. Neuron 48, 403-415.
23. Nam JH, Cotton JR & Grant W (2007a). A virtual hair cell, I: addition of gating spring theory into a 3-D bundle mechanical model. Biophys J 92, 1918-1928.
24. Nam JH, Cotton JR & Grant W (2007b). A virtual hair cell, II: evaluation of mechanoelectric transduction paramaters. Biophys J 92, 1929-1937.
25. Nam JH, Cotton JR, Peterson EH & Grant W (2006). Mechanical properties and consequences of stereocilia and extracellular links in vestibular hair bundles. Biophys J 90, 2786-2795.
26. Percival DB & Walden AT (1993). Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications: Multitaper and Conventional Univariate Techniques. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
27. Reichenbach T & Hudspeth AJ (2011). Unidirectional mechanical amplification as a design principle for an active microphone. Phys Rev Lett 106, 158701-1-158701-4.
28. Robles L & Ruggero MA (2001). Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81, 1305-1352.
29. Robles L, Ruggero MA & Rich NC (1997). Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. J Neurophysiol 77, 2385-2399.
30. Svrcek-Seiler WA, Gebeshuber IC, Rattay F, Biro TS & Markum H (1998). Micromechanical models for the Brownian motion of hair cell stereocilia. J Theor Biol 193, 623-630.
31. Thomson DJ (1982). Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proc IEEE 70, 1055-1096.
32. Thomson DJ & Chave AD (1991). Jackknifed error estimates for spectra, coherences, and transfer functions. In Advances in Spectrum Analysis and Array Processing, (Haykin S, Ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 58-113. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
33. Zetes DE & Steele CR (1997). Fluid-structure interaction of the stereocilia bundle in relation to mechanotransduction. J Acoust Soc Am 101, 3593-3601.