Molecular phylogenetics and microsatellite analysis reveal cryptic species of speckled dace (Cyprinidae: Rhinichthys osculus) in Oregon's Great Basin

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 238-250

  Hoekzema, Kendra ^a   Sidlauskas, Brian L ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cryptic species; Evolutionarily significant units; Phylogeography; Pleistocene lakes; Pluvial period; Threatened subspecies

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; CYPRINIFORMES; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; LAKE; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION GENETICS; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CYPRINIDAE; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENETICS, POPULATION; LAKES; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; OREGON; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84900802912     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.027     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ardren W.R., Baumsteiger J., Allen C.S. Genetic analysis and uncertain taxonomic status of threatened Foskett Spring speckled dace. Conserv. Genet. 2010, 11(4):1299-1315.
2. Avise J.C., Hamrick J.L. Conservation Genetics, Case Histories from Nature 1996, Springer.
3. Baerwald M.R., May B. Characterization of microsatellite loci for five members of the minnow family Cyprinidae found in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4(3):385-390.
4. Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N., Bonhomme, F., 1996. Genetix 4.05, logiciel sous windows tm pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire génome, populations, interactions, CNRS UMR. 5000, 1996-2004.
5. Bickford D., Lohman D.J., Sodhi N.S., Ng P.K.L., Meier R., Winker K., Ingram K.K., Das I. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22(3):148-155.
6. Billman E.J., Lee J.B., Young D.O., McKell M.D., Evans R.P., Shiozawa D.K. Phylogenetic divergence in a desert fish: differentiation of speckled dace within the Bonneville, Lahontan, and Upper Snake River basins. N. Am. Nat. 2010, 70(1):39-47.
7. Bisson P.A., Bond C.E. Origin and distribution of the fishes of Harney Basin, Oregon. Copeia 1971, 1971(2):268-281.
8. Bond C.E., Rexstad E., Hughes R.M. Habitat use of twenty-five common species of Oregon freshwater fishes. Northwest Sci. 1988, 62(5):223-232.
9. Brown W.M., George M., Wilson A.C. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. PNAS 1979, 76(4):1967-1971.
10. Callejas C., Ochando M.D. Molecular identification (RAPD) of the eight species of the genus Barbus (Cyprinidae) in the Iberian Peninsula. J. Fish Biol. 2001, 59:1589-1599.
11. Carson E.W., Dowling T.E. Influence of hydrogeographic history and hybridization on the distribution of genetic variation in the pupfishes Cyprinodon atrorus and C. bifasciatus. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15(3):667-679.
12. Chen Y., Reid S., May B. Genetic relationships of tui chub populations in the northwestern Great Basin and conservation implications for the Cow Head tui chub. Conserv. Genet. 2009, 10(1):101-114.
13. Chow S., Hazama K. Universal PCR primers for S7 ribosomal protein gene introns in fish. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7(9):1255-1256.
14. Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. TCS, a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9(10):1657-1659.
15. Craig M.T., Graham R.T., Torres R.A., Hyde J.R., Freitas M.O., Ferreira B.P., Hostim-Silva M., Gerhardinger L.C., Bertoncini A.A., Robertson D.R. How many species of goliath grouper are there? Cryptic genetic divergence in a threatened marine fish and the resurrection of a geopolitical species. Endang. Species Res. 2009, 7:167-174.
16. deQueiroz K. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56(6):879-886.
17. deQueiroz K., Donoghue M.J. Phylogenetic systematics and species revisited. Cladistics 1990, 6(1):83-90.
18. DiBattista J.D., Waldrop E., Bowen B.W., Schultz J.K., Gaither M.R., Pyle R.L., Rocha L.A. Twister sister species of pygmy angelfishes: discordance between taxonomy, coloration, and phylogenetics. Coral Reefs 2012, 31(3):839-851.
19. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. Beast, Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7(1):214.
20. Dugas D.P. Late quaternary variations in the level of paleo-Lake Malheur, Eastern Oregon. Quatern. Res. 1998, 50:276-282.
21. Evanno G., Regnaut S., Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure, a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14(8):2611-2620.
22. Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolut. Bioinform. Online 2005, 1:47.
23. Felsenstein, J., 1993. Phylip, Phylogenetic Inference Package, version 3.5 c.
24. Gillooly J.F., Allen A.P., West G.B., Brown J.H. The rate of DNA evolution, effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. PNAS 2005, 102(1):140-145.
25. Griffiths A.M., Sims D.W., Cotterell S.P., Nagar A.E., Ellis J.R., Lynghammer A., McHugh M., Neat F.C., Padel N.G., Quieroz N., Serra-Pereiera B., Rapp T., Wearmouth V.J., Genner M.J. Molecular markers reveal spatially segregated cryptic species in a critically endangered fish, the common skate (Dipturus batis). Proc. Roy. Soc. B 2010, 277(1687):1497-1503.
26. Haig S.M., Beever E.A., Chambers S.M., Draheim H.M., Dugger B.D., Dunham S., Elliott-Smith E., Fontaine J.B., Kesler D.C., Knaus B.J., et al. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the US Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20(6):1584-1594.
27. Hanke M., Wink M. Direct DNA sequencing of PCR-amplified vector inserts following enzymatic degradation of primer and dNTPs. Biotechniques 1994, 17(5):858.
28. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27(3):570-580.
29. Houston D.D., Shiozawa D.K., Riddle B.R. Phylogenetic relationships of the Western North American cyprinid genus Richardsonius, with an overview of phylogeographic structure. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 55(1):259-273.
30. Hubbs C.L., Miller R.R. The Great Basin with emphasis on glacial and postglacial times. II. The zoological evidence. Bull. Univ. Utah 1948, 38(20):17-166.
31. Hubbs, C.L., Miller, R.R., Hubbs, L.C., 1974. Hydrographic History and Relict Fishes of the North-central Great Basin. Number 7. California Academy of Sciences.
32. Johnson J.B. Evolution after the flood: phylogeography of the desert fish Utah Chub. Evolution 2002, 56:948-960.
33. Johnson K.P., Seger J. Elevated rates of nonsynonymous substitution in island birds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18(5):874-881.
34. Kon T., Yoshino T., Mukai T., Nishida M. DNA sequences identify numerous cryptic species of the vertebrate: a lesson from the gobioid fish Schindleria. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44(1):53-62.
35. Lanfear R., Calcott B., Ho S.Y., Guindon S. PartitionFinder, combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29(6):1695-1701.
36. Lee, D.S., 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History.
37. Lopera-Barrero N.M., Povh J.A., Ribeiro R.P., Gomes P.C., Jacometo C.B., da Silva Lopes T. Comparison of DNA extraction protocols of fish fin and larvae samples, modified salt (NaCl) extraction. Ciencia Invest. Agraria 2008, 35:65-74.
38. Lopes-Cunha M., Aboim M.A., Mesquita N., Alves M.J., Doadrio I., Coelho M.M. Population genetic structure in the Iberian cyprinid fish Iberochondrostoma lemmingii (Steindachner, 1866): disentangling species fragmentation and colonization processes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 105:559-572.
39. Luca C., Manea A., Luca A., Dinischiotu A., Costache M. Molecular phylogeny of the Romanian cyprinids from the Danube River. Rouman. Soc. Biol. Sci. 2008, 13(5):3970-3975.
40. Mace G.M. The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 359(1444):711-719.
41. Marshall C.R. A simple method for bracketing absolute divergence times on molecular phylogenies using multiple fossil calibration points. Am. Nat. 2008, 171(6):726-742.
42. Martin A.P. Substitution rates of organelle and nuclear genes in sharks, implicating metabolic rate (again). Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16(7):996-1002.
43. Minckley, W., Hendrickson, D., Bond, C., 1986. Geography of western North American freshwater fishes, description and relationships to intracontinental tectonism. In: Hocutt, C.H., Wiley, E.O. (Eds.), The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes, New York, pp. 519-613.
44. Nei M., Tajima F., Tateno Y. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J. Mol. Evol. 1983, 19(2):153-170.
45. Oakey D.D., Douglas M.E., Douglas M.R. Small fish in a large landscape, diversification of Rhinichthys osculus (Cyprinidae) in western North America. Copeia 2004, 2004(2):207-221.
46. Ohta T. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1992, 23:263-286.
47. Page L.M., Burr B.M. A Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes, North America North of Mexico 1998, Houghton Miffin Harcourt.
48. Pezzopane S.K., Weldon R.J. Tectonic role of active faulting in Central Oregon. Tectonics 1993, 12(5):1140-1169.
49. Pfrender M.E., Hicks J., Lynch M. Biogeographic patterns and current distribution of molecular-genetic variation among populations of speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus (Girard). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 30(3):490-502.
50. Posada D. JModelTest, phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25(7):1253-1256.
51. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155(2):945-959.
52. R Core Team, 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation Statistical Computing.
53. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A., 2007. Tracer v1. 4.
54. Rand D.M. Thermal habit, metabolic rate and the evolution of mitochondrial DNA. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9(4):125-131.
55. Raymond M., Rousset F. GENEPOP version 1.2, population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 1995, 86(3):248-249.
56. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. Mrbayes 3.2, efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61(3):539-542.
57. Rozas J. DNA sequence polymorphism analysis using DnaSP. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis; Methods in Molecular Biology Series 2009, vol. 537:337-350. Humana Press, NJ, USA.
58. Schmidt T.R., Bielawski J.P., Gold J.R. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of the cytochrome b gene in the cyprinid genus Lythrurus (Actinopterygii, Cypriniformes). Copeia 1998, 1998(1):14-22.
59. Scott, W.B., Crossman, E.J., 1998. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Galt House Pub.
60. Smith G.R. Biogeography of intermountain fishes. Great Basin Nat. Mem. 1978, 2:17-42.
61. Smith, G.R., Dowling, T.E., 2008. Correlating hydrographic events and divergence times of speckled dace (Rhinichthys, Teleostei, Cyprinidae) in the Colorado River drainage. In: Reheis, M.C., Hershler, R., Miller, D.M. (Eds.), Late Cenozoic Drainage History of the Southwestern Great Basin and Lower Colorado River Region: Geologic and Biotic Perspectives. Special Paper 439, Geological Society of America, pp. 301-317.
62. Smith, G.R., Dowling, T., Gobalet, K., Lugaski, T., Shiozawa, D., Evans, R., 2002. Biogeography and timing of evolutionary events among Great Basin fishes. In: Hershler, R., Madsen, D.B., Currey, D.R. (Eds.), Great Basin Aquatic Systems History. Smithsonian Contributions to Earth Sciences, pp. 175-234.
63. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC, maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(21):2688-2690.
64. Strauss R.E., Bond C.E. Taxonomic methods: morphology. Methods for Fish Biology 1990, 109-140. American Fisheries Society, Maryland. C.B. Schreck, P. Moyle (Eds.).
65. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5, molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28(10):2731-2739.
66. Turner G.F. What is a fish species?. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 1999, 9(4):281-297.
67. Turner T.F., Dowling T.E., Broughton R.E., Gold J.R. Variable microsatellite markers amplify across divergent lineages of cyprinid fishes (subfamily Leusicinae). Conserv. Genet. 2004, 5(2):279-281.
68. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009. Foskett Speckled Dace (Rhinichthys osculus ssp.) 5-year review, Summary and Evaluation, pp. 1-18.
69. US Fish and Wildlife Service Determination of threatened status for Hutton tui chub and Foskett speckled dace. Fed. Reg. 1985, 50:12302-12306.
70. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998. Recovery Plan for the Native Fishes of the Warner Basin and Alkali Subbasin, pp. 1-86.
71. van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W.F., Wills D.P., Shipley P. MicroChecker, software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4(3):535-538.
72. Wang X., He S., Chen Y. Sequence variations of the S7 ribosomal protein gene in primitive cyprinid fishes, implication on phylogenetic analysis. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2002, 47(19):1638-1643.
73. Weir B., Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984, 38(6):1358-1370.
74. Wheeler Q.D. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 359(1444):571-583.
75. Woodman D.A. Systematic relationships within the Cyprinid genus Rhinichthys. Systematics. Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes 1992, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 374-391.
76. Woolfit M., Bromham L. Increased rates of sequence evolution in endosymbiotic bacteria and fungi with small effective population sizes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20(9):1545-1555.
77. Zardoya R., Doadrio I. Phylogenetic relationships of Iberian cyprinids, systematic and biogeographical implications. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 1998, 265(1403):1365-1372.
78. Zink R.M. The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 2004, 271(1539):561-564.