Geometry-based pressure drop prediction in mildly diseased human coronary arteries

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1810-1815

  Schrauwen, J T C ^a   Wentzel, J J ^a   van der Steen, A F W ^a   Gijsen, F J H ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; CFD; Coronary arteries; FFR; Pressure drop prediction

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ESTIMATION; FORECASTING; PRESSURE DROP; REYNOLDS NUMBER; ULTRASONICS;

ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERIES; FFR; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVES; GEOMETRICAL COMPLEXITY; HUMAN CORONARY ARTERIES; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; PRESSURE DROP ESTIMATION;

GEOMETRY;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FRACTION FLOW RESERVE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESSURE DROP; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CFD; CORONARY ARTERIES; FFR; PRESSURE DROP PREDICTION;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84900550428     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Banerjee R.K., et al. Hemodynamic diagnostics of epicardial coronary stenoses: in-vitro experimental and computational study. Biomed. Eng. Online 2008, 7:24.
2. Bijari P.B., et al. Improved prediction of disturbed flow via hemodynamically-inspired geometric variables. J. Biomech. 2012, 45(9):1632-1637.
3. Corban M.T., et al. Combination of plaque burden, wall shear stress, and plaque phenotype has incremental value for prediction of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability. Atherosclerosis 2014, 232(2):271-276.
4. Falk E., Shah P.K., Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995, 92(3):657-671.
5. Feldman C.L., et al. Determination of in vivo velocity and endothelial shear stress patterns with phasic flow in human coronary arteries: a methodology to predict progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Am. Heart J. 2002, 143(6):931-939.
6. Fukumoto Y., et al. Localized elevation of shear stress is related to coronary plaque rupture: a 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study with in-vivo color mapping of shear stress distribution. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51(6):645-650.
7. Van der Giessen A.G., et al. 3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2010, 26(7):781-796.
8. Van der Giessen A.G., et al. The influence of boundary conditions on wall shear stress distribution in patients specific coronary trees. J. Biomech. 2011, 44(6):1089-1095.
9. Gijsen F.J.H., et al. High shear stress induces a strain increase in human coronary plaques over a 6-month period. EuroIntervention[U+202F]: J. EuroPCR Collab. Working Group Intervent. Cardiol. Eur. Soc. Cardiol. 2011, 7(1):121-127.
10. Gijsen F.J.H., et al. Shear stress and advanced atherosclerosis in human coronary arteries. J. Biomech. 2013, 46(2):240-247.
11. Gijsen F.J.H., et al. Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2008, 295:1608-1614.
12. Girasis C., et al. Novel bifurcation phantoms for validation of quantitative coronary angiography algorithms. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011, 77(6):790-797.
13. Gould K.L., Kelley K.O., Bolson E.L. Experimental validation of quantitative coronary arteriography for determining pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenosis. Circulation 1982, 66(5):930-937.
14. Van der Horst A., et al. Towards patient-specific modeling of coronary hemodynamics in healthy and diseased state. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013, 15.
15. Huo Y., Kassab G.S. Pulsatile blood flow in the entire coronary arterial tree: theory and experiment. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2006, 291(3):H1074-H1087.
16. Johnston B.M., et al. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: transient simulations. J. Biomech. 2006, 39(6):1116-1128.
17. Kim H.J., Vignon-Clementel I.E., et al. Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38(10):3195-3209.
18. Kim H.J., Jansen K.E., Taylor C.a. Incorporating autoregulatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system in three-dimensional finite element models of arterial blood flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38(7):2314-2330.
19. Koo B.K., et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter discover-flow. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58(19):1989-1997.
20. Min J.K., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA: J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2012, 308(12):1237-1245.
21. Mollet N.R., et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary plaque burden using multislice computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol. 2005, 95(10):1165-1169.
22. Myers J.G., et al. Factors influencing blood flow patterns in the human right coronary artery. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 29(2):109-120.
23. Olufsen M.S. Structured tree outflow condition for blood flow in larger systemic arteries Structured tree outflow condition for blood flow in larger systemic arteries. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 1999, 276:257-268.
24. Pahlevan N.M., et al. A physiologically relevant, simple outflow boundary model for truncated vasculature. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 39(5):1470-1481.
25. Pijls N.H., et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334(26):1703-1708.
26. Pijls N.H., Bruyne B.de Coronary Pressure 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Schuurbiers J.C.H., et al. in vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009, 73(5):620-626.
28. Slager C.J., et al. True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. Circulation 2000, 102(5):511-516.
29. Stary H.C., et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis[U+202F]: a report from the committee on vascular lesions of the council on arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1995, 15(9):1512-1531.
30. Stergiopulos N., Young D.F., Rogge T.R. Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J. Biomech. 1992, 25(12):1477-1488.
31. Stone G.W., et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364(3):226-235.
32. Stone P.H., et al. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the prediction study. Circulation 2012, 126(2):172-181.
33. Tonino P.a.L., et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55(25):2816-2821.
34. Tu S., et al. in vivo assessment of bifurcation optimal viewing angles and bifurcation angles by three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2012, 28(7):1617-1625.
35. De Weert T.T., et al. Atherosclerotic plaque surface morphology in the carotid bifurcation assessed with multidetector computed tomography angiography. Stroke: J. Cerebral Circ. 2009, 40(4):1334-1340.
36. Young D., Tsai F. Flow characteristics in model of aterial stenosis - I steady flow. J. Biomech. 1973, 6(4):395-410.
37. Young D., Tsai F. Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenoses - II unsteady flow. J. Biomech. 1973, 6(1955):547-559.