Novel bifurcation phantoms for validation of quantitative coronary angiography algorithms

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 790-797

  Girasis, Chrysafios ^a   Schuurbiers, Johan C H ^a   Onuma, Yoshinobu ^a   Serruys, Patrick W ^a   Wentzel, Jolanda J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

coronary angiography; in vitro; phantom; quantitative coronary angiography; software validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GEOMETRY; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LEARNING ALGORITHM; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PHANTOM; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79955380028     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22704     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, Montauban van Swijndregt E, Lehmann KG, Ozaki Y, di Mario C, Kirkeeide R, Serruys PW,. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Circulation 1995; 91: 2174-2183.
2. Hausleiter J, Jost S, Nolte CW, Dirschinger J, Kastrati A, Stiel GM, Wunderlich W, Fischer F, Linderer T, Hausmann D, et al. Comparative in-vitro validation of eight first- and second-generation quantitative coronary angiography systems. Coron Artery Dis 1997; 8: 83-90. (Pubitemid 27248433)
3. Gronenschild E, Janssen J, Tijdens F,. CAAS. II. A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 33: 61-75. (Pubitemid 24303004)
4. Serruys PW, Kay IP, Disco C, Deshpande NV, de Feyter PJ,. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: Results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I. BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coronaries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1067-1074. (Pubitemid 29500540)
5. Pocock SJ, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Fahy MP, Na Y, Dangas G, Moses JW, Pucelikova T, Kandzari DE, et al. Angiographic surrogate end points in drug-eluting stent trials: A systematic evaluation based on individual patient data from 11 randomized, controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 23-32.
6. de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW, Davies MJ, Richardson P, Lubsen J, Oliver MF,. Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. Circulation 1991; 84: 412-423.
7. Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, Wijns W, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, den Boer A, Hugenholtz PG,. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985; 71: 280-288. (Pubitemid 15157088)
8. Haase J, Di Mario C, Slager CJ, van der Giessen WJ, den Boer A, de Feyter PJ, Reiber JH, Verdouw PD, Serruys PW,. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 27: 16-27.
9. Van Herck PL, Gavit L, Gorissen P, Wuyts FL, Claeys MJ, Bosmans JM, Benali K, Vrints CJ,. Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat-panel system. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 192-200. (Pubitemid 39313413)
10. Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Seppenwoolde Y, Reiber JH,. Is there an effect of flat-panel-based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography? Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 561-566. (Pubitemid 44546051)
11. Lansky A, Tuinenburg J, Costa M, Maeng M, Koning G, Popma J, Cristea E, Gavit L, Costa R, Rares A, et al. Quantitative angiographic methods for bifurcation lesions: A consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 258-266.
12. Legrand V, Thomas M, Zelizko M, DeBruyne B, Reifart N, Steigen T, Hildick-Smith D, Albiero R, Darremont O, Stankovic G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions: State-of-the-art. Insights from the second meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2007; 3: 44-49.
13. Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V, Hildick-Smith D, Galassi AR, Pan M, Burzotta F, Zelizko M, Dudek D, Ludman P, et al. Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: Time for a consensus! Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 175-183. (Pubitemid 351293761)
14. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M,. [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 183.
15. Enrico B, Suranyi P, Thilo C, Bonomo L, Costello P, Schoepf UJ,. Coronary artery plaque formation at coronary CT angiography: Morphological analysis and relationship to hemodynamics. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 837-844.
16. Collins N, Seidelin PH, Daly P, Ivanov J, Barolet A, Mackie K, Bui S, Schwartz L, Dzavik V,. Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 404-410.
17. Van Mieghem CA, Thury A, Meijboom WB, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Weustink AC, Sianos G, de Jaegere PP, Serruys PW, de Feyter P,. Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1968-1976. (Pubitemid 47579536)
18. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, Bennett L, Holmberg S, Cotton JM, Glennon PE, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010; 121: 1235-1243.
19. Park SJ, Lee CW, Kim YH, Lee JH, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SW,. Technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcome of stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation narrowing. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 374-378.
20. Oviedo C, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Araki H, Choi SY, Tsujita K, Kubo T, Doi H, Templin B, Lansky AJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound classification of plaque distribution in left main coronary artery bifurcations: Where is the plaque really located? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 105-112.
21. Finet G, Gilard M, Perrenot B, Rioufol G, Motreff P, Gavit L, Prost R,. Fractal geometry of arterial coronary bifurcations: A quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound analysis. EuroIntervention 2008; 3: 490-498.
22. Ramcharitar S, Onuma Y, Aben JP, Consten C, Weijers B, Morel MA, Serruys PW,. A novel dedicated quantitative coronary analysis methodology for bifurcation lesions. EuroIntervention 2008; 3: 553-557.
23. Sano K, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, de Ribamar Costa J Jr, Qian J, Missel E, Shan S, Franklin-Bond T, Boland P, Weisz G, et al. Assessing intermediate left main coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 983-988. (Pubitemid 47632490)
24. Goktekin O, Kaplan S, Dimopoulos K, Barlis P, Tanigawa J, Vatankulu MA, Koning G, Tuinenburg JC, Mario CD,. A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: Comparison with current conventional methods. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 172-180. (Pubitemid 46214248)
25. Miyazawa A, Ako J, Hassan A, Hasegawa T, Abizaid A, Verheye S, McClean D, Neumann FJ, Grube E, Honda Y, et al. Analysis of bifurcation lesions treated with novel drug-eluting dedicated bifurcation stent system: Intravascular ultrasound results of the AXXESS PLUS trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 952-957.
26. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, Louvard Y, Desmedt B, Di Mario C, Leon MB,. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004; 109: 1244-1249. (Pubitemid 38372783)
27. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, Violini R, Lettieri C, Zanini R, Sheiban I, Paloscia L, Grube E, Schofer J, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation 2009; 119: 71-78.
28. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Narbute I, Gunnes P, Mannsverk J, Meyerdierks O, Rotevatn S, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006; 114: 1955-1961. (Pubitemid 44665390)
29. Di Mario C, Morici N, Godino C, Goktekin O, Tamburino C, Barbagallo R, Antoniucci D, Grube E, Airoldi F, Zoccai GB, et al. Predictors of restenosis after treatment of bifurcational lesions with paclitaxel eluting stents: A multicenter prospective registry of 150 consecutive patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 416-424. (Pubitemid 46339286)
30. van der Giessen AG, Wentzel JJ, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, van der Steen AF, van de Vosse FN, de Feyter PJ, Gijsen FJ,. Plaque and shear stress distribution in human coronary bifurcations: A multislice computed tomography study. EuroIntervention 2009; 4: 654-661.
31. Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Colombo A, Holmes DR Jr, Feldman TE, Bass EJ, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Morice MC,. 3-Dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease a substudy of the SYNTAX Trial (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXus and Cardiac Surgery). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 41-48.
32. Chen S, Zhang J, Ye F, Chen Y, Fang W, Wei M, He B, Sun X, Yang S, Kwan TW,. Final kissing balloon inflation by classic crush stenting did not improve the clinical outcomes for the treatment of unprotected left main bifurcation lesions: The importance of double-kissing crush technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 166-172. (Pubitemid 351293759)
33. Pflederer T, Ludwig J, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S,. Measurement of coronary artery bifurcation angles by multidetector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 793-798. (Pubitemid 44564023)
34. Thomas JB, Antiga L, Che SL, Milner JS, Steinman DA, Spence JD, Rutt BK,. Variation in the carotid bifurcation geometry of young versus older adults: Implications for geometric risk of atherosclerosis. Stroke 2005; 36: 2450-2456. (Pubitemid 41566976)
35. Reiber JH, van der Zwet PM, Koning G, von Land CD, van Meurs B, Gerbrands JJ, Buis B, van Voorthuisen AE,. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: Observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993; 28: 187-198. (Pubitemid 23097000)
36. Fleming RM, Kirkeeide RL, Smalling RW, Gould KL,. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18: 945-951.
37. Dzavik V, Kharbanda R, Ivanov J, Ing DJ, Bui S, Mackie K, Ramsamujh R, Barolet A, Schwartz L, Seidelin PH,. Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: Importance of the bifurcation angle. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 762-769. (Pubitemid 44396889)