Quantifying visual preferences around the world

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 11-20

  Reinecke, Katharina ^a   Gajos, Krzysztof Z ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Colorfulness; Complexity; Modeling; Personalization; Website Aesthetics

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; MODELS; WEBSITES;

ADAPTATION; COLORFULNESS; COMPLEXITY; PERSONALIZATIONS; WEBSITE AESTHETICS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84900413258     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2556288.2557052     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Barber, W., and Badre, A. Culturability: The Merging of Culture and Usability. In Conference on Human Factors &the Web (1998).
2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., and Bolker, B. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, 2013. R package version 0.999999-2.
3. Berlyne, D. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Pub. Corp., 1974.
4. Bloch, P. Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response. The Journal of Marketing 59, 3 (1995), 16-29.
5. Chen, J. Y., Whitfield, T. W. A., Robertson, K., and Chen, Y. The Effect of Cultural and Educational Background in the Aesthetic Responses of Website Users. Tech. rep., National Institute for Design Research, Swinburne University of Technology, 2010.
6. Cyr, D., Head, M., and Larios, H. Colour Appeal in Website Design Within and Across Cultures: A Multi-method Evaluation. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1-2 (2010), 1-21.
7. Cyr, D., and Trevor-Smith, H. Localization of Web Design: An Empirical Comparison of German, Japanese, and U.S. Website Characteristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(13) (2004), 1-10.
8. Geissler, G., Zinkhan, G., and Watson, R. The Influence of Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent. Journal of Advertising 35, 2 (2006), 69-80.
9. Gelman, A. Boot, 2013. http://andrewgelman.com/2013/06/03/boot/, last accessed September 16, 2013.
10. Hasler, D., and Suesstrunk, S. Measuring Colourfulness in Natural Images. In Proc. SPIE/IS&T Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, vol. 5007 (2003), 87-95.
11. Hoyer, W. D., and Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. The Role of Aesthetic Taste in Consumer Behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40, 1 (2011), 167-180.
12. Hsiu-Feng, W. Picture Perfect: Girls' and Boys' Preferences Towards Visual Complexity in Children's Websites. Computers in Human Behavior (2013).
13. Ivory, M., Sinha, R., and Hearst, M. Empirically Validated Web Page Design Metrics. In Proc. CHI'01 (2001), 53-60.
14. Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C., Sen, D., Sumegi, L., and Noonan, P. An Exploration of Relations Between Visual Appeal, Trustworthiness and Perceived Usability of Homepages. ACM ToCHI 18, 1 (2011).
15. Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., and Brown, J. Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 Milliseconds to Make a Good First Impression! Behaviour &Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 115-126.
16. Martindale, C., Moore, K., and Borkum, J. Aesthetic Preference: Anomalous Findings for Berlyne's Psychobiological Theory. The American Journal of Psychology (1990), 53-80.
17. Michailidou, E., Harper, S., and Bechhofer, S. Visual Complexity and Aesthetic Perception of Web Pages. Proc. Design of Communication (2008), 215-224.
18. Moshagen, M., Musch, J., and Göritz, A. S. A Blessing, not a Curse: Experimental Evidence for Beneficial Effects of Visual Aesthetics on Performance. Ergonomics 52, 10 (2009), 1311-1320.
19. Moshagen, M., and Thielsch, M. T. Facets of visual aesthetics. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 10 (2010), 689-709.
20. Moss, G., and Gunn, R. Gender Differences in Website Production and Preference Aesthetics: Preliminary Implications for ICT Education and Beyond. Behaviour &Information Technology 28, 5 (2000), 447-460.
21. Nakagawa, S., and Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4 (2013), 133-142.
22. Ortony, A., Norman, D. A., and Revelle, W. The role of affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. Oxford University Press, 2005.
23. Palmer, S., and Schloss, K. Ecological Valence and Human Color Preferences. Proc. National Academy of Science 107 (2010), 8877-8882.
24. Reinecke, K., and Bernstein, A. Improving Performance, Perceived Usability, and Aesthetics with Culturally Adaptive User Interfaces. ACM ToCHI 18, 2 (2011).
25. Reinecke, K., Yeh, T., Miratrix, L., Mardiko, R., Zhao, Y., Liu, J., and Gajos, K. Predicting Users' First Impressions of Website Aesthetics With a Quantification of Perceived Visual Complexity and Colorfulness. In Proc. CHI'13 (2013).
26. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., and Nakano, L. Measuring Visual Clutter. Journal of Vision 7, 2 (2007).
27. Tractinsky, N. Visual Aesthetics. The Interaction Design Foundation, 2013.
28. Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M., and Sharfi, T. Evaluating the Consistency of Immediate Aesthetic Perceptions of Web Pages. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006).
29. Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., and Opwis, K. Symmetry and Aesthetics in Website Design: It's a Man's Business. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1831-1837.
30. Tuch, A. N., Presslaber, E., Stoecklin, M., Opwis, K., and Bargas-Avila, J. The Role of Visual Complexity and Prototypicality Regarding First Impression of Websites: Working Towards Understanding Aesthetic Judgments. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70(11) (2012).
31. Zheng, X., Chakraborty, I., Lin, J., and Rauschenberger, R. Correlating Low-level Image Statistics with Users' Rapid Aesthetic and Affective Judgments of Web Pages. In Proc. CHI'09 (2009).