Pericentromere tension is self-regulated by spindle structure in metaphase

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 205, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 313-324

  Chacón, Jeremy M ^a   Mukherjee, Soumya ^a   Schuster, Breanna M ^a   Clarke, Duncan J ^a   Gardner, Melissa K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERPHASE; METAPHASE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PERICENTROMERE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIMULATION; VISCOELASTICITY; WILD TYPE;

CENTROMERE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; METAPHASE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPINDLE APPARATUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84900401010     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201312024     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Akiyoshi, B., K.K. Sarangapani, A.F. Powers, C.R. Nelson, S.L. Reichow, H. Arellano-Santoyo, T. Gonen, J.A. Ranish, C.L. Asbury, and S. Biggins. 2010. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature. 468:576-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09594
2. Alexander, S.P., and C.L. Rieder. 1991. Chromosome motion during attachment to the vertebrate spindle: initial saltatory-like behavior of chromosomes and quantitative analysis of force production by nascent kinetochore fibers. J. Cell Biol. 113:805-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.113.4.805
3. Asbury, C.L., D.R. Gestaut, A.F. Powers, A.D. Franck, and T.N. Davis. 2006. The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:9873-9878. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602249103
4. Bakhoum, S.F., S.L. Thompson, A.L. Manning, and D.A. Compton. 2009. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 11:27-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1809
5. Bouck, D.C., and K. Bloom. 2007. Pericentric chromatin is an elastic component of the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 17:741-748. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.cub.2007.03.033
6. Burnette, D.T., P. Sengupta, Y. Dai, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and B. Kachar. 2011. Bleaching/blinking assisted localization microscopy for superresolution imaging using standard fluorescent molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:21081-21086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117430109
7. Bustamante, C., J.C. Macosko, and G.J. Wuite. 2000. Grabbing the cat by the tail: manipulating molecules one by one. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1:130-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35040072
8. Chacón, J.M., and M.K. Gardner. 2013. Analysis and modeling of chromosome congression during mitosis in the chemotherapy drug cisplatin. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 6:406-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12195-013-0306-7
9. Cimini, D., L.A. Cameron, and E.D. Salmon. 2004. Anaphase spindle mechanics prevent mis-segregation of merotelically oriented chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 14:2149-2155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.029
10. DiNardo, S., K. Voelkel, and R. Sternglanz. 1984. DNA topoisomerase II mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: topoisomerase II is required for segregation of daughter molecules at the termination of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81:2616-2620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.81.9.2616
11. Dumont, S., and T.J. Mitchison. 2009. Force and length in the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 19:R749-R761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.028
12. Gardner, M.K., C.G. Pearson, B.L. Sprague, T.R. Zarzar, K. Bloom, E.D. Salmon, and D.J. Odde. 2005. Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:3764-3775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0275
13. Gardner, M.K., D.C. Bouck, L.V. Paliulis, J.B. Meehl, E.T. O'Toole, J. Haase, A. Soubry, A.P. Joglekar, M. Winey, E.D. Salmon, et al. 2008. Chromosome congression by Kinesin-5 motor-mediated disassembly of longer kinetochore microtubules. Cell. 135:894-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell .2008.09.046
14. Gardner, M.K., B.L. Sprague, C.G. Pearson, B.D. Cosgrove, A.D. Bicek, K. Bloom, E.D. Salmon, and D.J. Odde. 2010. Model convolution: A computational approach to digital image interpretation. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 3:163-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12195-010-0101-7
15. Gay, G., T. Courtheoux, C. Reyes, S. Tournier, and Y. Gachet. 2012. A stochastic model of kinetochore-microtubule attachment accurately describes fission yeast chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 196:757-774. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201107124
16. Grishchuk, E.L., M.I. Molodtsov, F.I. Ataullakhanov, and J.R. McIntosh. 2005. Force production by disassembling microtubules. Nature. 438:384-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04132
17. Gupta, M.L., Jr., P. Carvalho, D.M. Roof, and D. Pellman. 2006. Plus end-specific depolymerase activity of Kip3, a kinesin-8 protein, explains its role in positioning the yeast mitotic spindle. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:913-923. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1457
18. Haase, J., A. Stephens, J. Verdaasdonk, E. Yeh, and K. Bloom. 2012. Bub1 kinase and Sgo1 modulate pericentric chromatin in response to altered microtubule dynamics. Curr. Biol. 22:471-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub .2012.02.006
19. Howard, J. 2001. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton. Sinauer Associates, Sundeland, MA. 367 pp.
20. Inoué, S., and E.D. Salmon. 1995. Force generation by microtubule assembly/ disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:1619-1640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.6.12.1619
21. Jaqaman, K., D. Loerke, M. Mettlen, H. Kuwata, S. Grinstein, S.L. Schmid, and G. Danuser. 2008. Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences. Nat. Methods. 5:695-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth .1237
22. Kamiti, M., and T.G.M. van De Ven. 1996. Measurement of spring constants of polyacrylamide chains bridging particles to a solid surface. Macromolecules. 29: 1191-1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma950173m
23. Kawamura, R., L.H. Pope, M.O. Christensen, M. Sun, K. Terekhova, F. Boege, C. Mielke, A.H. Andersen, and J.F. Marko. 2010. Mitotic chromosomes are constrained by topoisomerase II-sensitive DNA entanglements. J. Cell Biol. 188:653-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200910085
24. Khodjakov, A., and J. Pines. 2010. Centromere tension: a divisive issue. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:919-923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1010-919
25. Levi, V., Q. Ruan, M. Plutz, A.S. Belmont, and E. Gratton. 2005. Chromatin dynamics in interphase cells revealed by tracking in a two-photon excitation microscope. Biophys. J. 89:4275-4285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/ biophysj.105.066670
26. Maddox, P.S., K.S. Bloom, and E.D. Salmon. 2000. The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:36-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/71357
27. Maddox, P., A. Straight, P. Coughlin, T.J. Mitchison, and E.D. Salmon. 2003. Direct observation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores in Xenopus extract spindles: implications for spindle mechanics. J. Cell Biol. 162: 377-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200301088
28. Maresca, T.J., and E.D. Salmon. 2009. Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J. Cell Biol. 184:373-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200808130
29. Marshall, W.F., A. Straight, J.F. Marko, J. Swedlow, A. Dernburg, A. Belmont, A.W. Murray, D.A. Agard, and J.W. Sedat. 1997. Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr. Biol. 7:930-939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00412-X
30. Marshall, W.F., J.F. Marko, D.A. Agard, and J.W. Sedat. 2001. Chromosome elasticity and mitotic polar ejection force measured in living Drosophila embryos by four-dimensional microscopy-based motion analysis. Curr. Biol. 11:569-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00180-4
31. Michalet, X. 2010. Mean square displacement analysis of single-particle trajectories with localization error: Brownian motion in an isotropic medium. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 82:041914. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.041914
32. Mickey, B., and J. Howard. 1995. Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. J. Cell Biol. 130:909-917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb .130.4.909
33. Moser, S.C., and J.R. Swedlow. 2011. How to be a mitotic chromosome. Chromosome Res. 19:307-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-011-9198-3
34. Nicklas, R.B. 1988. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17:431-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. bb.17.060188.002243
35. Nicklas, R.B., and C.A. Koch. 1969. Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 43:40-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.43.1.40
36. Pearson, C.G., P.S. Maddox, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2001. Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 152:1255-1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.152.6.1255
37. Pearson, C.G., P.S. Maddox, T.R. Zarzar, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 2003. Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell. 14:4181-4195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc .E03-03-0180
38. Pearson, C.G., M.K. Gardner, L.V. Paliulis, E.D. Salmon, D.J. Odde, and K. Bloom. 2006. Measuring nanometer scale gradients in spindle microtubule dynamics using model convolution microscopy. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17:4069-4079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-04-0312
39. Poirier, M.G., S. Eroglu, and J.F. Marko. 2002. The bending rigidity of mitotic chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:2170-2179.
40. Ribeiro, S.A., J.C. Gatlin, Y. Dong, A. Joglekar, L. Cameron, D.F. Hudson, C.J. Farr, B.F. McEwen, E.D. Salmon, W.C. Earnshaw, and P. Vagnarelli. 2009. Condensin regulates the stiffness of vertebrate centromeres. Mol. Biol. Cell. 20:2371-2380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-11-1127
41. Rieder, C.L., and E.D. Salmon. 1994. Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 124:223-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.124.3.223
42. Rieder, C.L., and E.D. Salmon. 1998. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 8:310-318. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/S0962-8924(98)01299-9
43. Skibbens, R.V., and E.D. Salmon. 1997. Micromanipulation of chromosomes in mitotic vertebrate tissue cells: tension controls the state of kinetochore movement. Exp. Cell Res. 235:314-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ excr.1997.3691
44. Skibbens, R.V., V.P. Skeen, and E.D. Salmon. 1993. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 122:859-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.122.4.859
45. Skibbens, R.V., C.L. Rieder, and E.D. Salmon. 1995. Kinetochore motility after severing between sister centromeres using laser microsurgery: evidence that kinetochore directional instability and position is regulated by tension. J. Cell Sci. 108:2537-2548.
46. Sprague, B.L., C.G. Pearson, P.S. Maddox, K.S. Bloom, E.D. Salmon, and D.J. Odde. 2003. Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle. Biophys. J. 84:3529-3546. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75087-5
47. Stephens, A.D., R.A. Haggerty, P.A. Vasquez, L. Vicci, C.E. Snider, F. Shi, C. Quammen, C. Mullins, J. Haase, R.M. Taylor II, et al. 2013. Pericentric chromatin loops function as a nonlinear spring in mitotic force balance. J. Cell Biol. 200:757-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201208163
48. Svoboda, K., C.F. Schmidt, B.J. Schnapp, and S.M. Block. 1993. Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry. Nature. 365:721-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/365721a0
49. Thomann, D., D.R. Rines, P.K. Sorger, and G. Danuser. 2002. Automatic fluorescent tag detection in 3D with super-resolution: application to the analysis of chromosome movement. J. Microsc. 208:49-64. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01066.x
50. Thompson, S.L., S.F. Bakhoum, and D.A. Compton. 2010. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol. 20:R285-R295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cub.2010.01.034
51. Verdaasdonk, J.S., P.A. Vasquez, R.M. Barry, T. Barry, S. Goodwin, M.G. Forest, and K. Bloom. 2013. Centromere tethering confines chromosome domains. Mol. Cell. 52:819-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013 .10.021
52. Volkov, V.A., A.V. Zaytsev, N. Gudimchuk, P.M. Grissom, A.L. Gintsburg, F. I. Ataullakhanov, J.R. McIntosh, and E.L. Grishchuk. 2013. Long tethers provide high-force coupling of the Dam1 ring to shortening microtubules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110:7708-7713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1305821110
53. Warsi, T.H., M.S. Navarro, and J. Bachant. 2008. DNA topoisomerase II is a determinant of the tensile properties of yeast centromeric chromatin and the tension checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:4421-4433. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1091/mbc.E08-05-0547
54. Waters, J.C., R.V. Skibbens, and E.D. Salmon. 1996. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109:2823-2831.