Force production by disassembling microtubules

Nature

Volumn 438, Issue 7066, 2005, Pages 384-388

  Grishchuk, Ekaterina L ^a,b   Molodtsov, Maxim I ^a,c   Ataullakhanov, Fazly I ^c,d,e   McIntosh, J Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF GENERAL PATHOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR HEMATOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^d MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^e INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BIOPHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOMES; ENZYMES; LASERS; PHYSIOLOGY;

CELL SHAPE; EUKARYOTIC CYTOSKELETON; MICROTUBULES (MT);

CELLS;

AVIDIN; BIOTIN; GLASS; POLYMER; TUBULIN;

MEDICINE;

ARTICLE; CONJUGATION; DEPOLYMERIZATION; DYNAMICS; FORCE; LASER; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 27844495240     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature04132     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Inoue, S. & Salmon, E. D. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 1619-1640 (1995).
2. Dogterom, M., Kerssemakers, J. W., Romet-Lemonne, G. & Janson, M. E. Force generation by dynamic microtubules. Can. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 67-74 (2005).
3. Waterman-Storer, C. M. & Salmon, E. D. Endoplasmic reticulum membrane tubules are distributed by microtubules in living cells using three distinct mechanisms. Can. Biol. 8, 798-806 (1998).
4. Waterman-Storer, C. M., Worthylake, R. A., Liu, B. P., Burridge, K. & Salmon, E. D. Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 45-50 (1999).
5. Koshland, D. E., Mitchison, T. J. & Kirschner, M. W. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature 331, 499-504 (1988).
6. Coue, M., Lombillo, V. A. & McIntosh, J. R. Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movement in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 112, 1165-1175 (1991).
7. Lombillo, V. A., Nislow, C., Yen, T. J., Gelfand, V. I. & McIntosh, J. R. Antibodies to the kinesin motor domain and CENP-E inhibit microtubule depolymerization-dependent motion of chromosomes in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 128, 107-115 (1995).
8. Lombillo, V. A., Stewart, R. J. & McIntosh, J. R. Minus-end-directed motion of kinesin-coated microspheres driven by microtubule depolymerization. Nature 373, 161-164 (1995).
9. Molodtsov, M. I. et al. A molecular-mechanical model of the microtubule. Biophys. J. 88, 3167-3179 (2005).
10. Molodtsov, M. I., Grishchuk, E. L., Efremov, A. K., McIntosh, J. R. & Ataullakhanov, F. I. Force production by depolymerizing microtubules: a theoretical study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4353-4358 (2005).
11. Muller-Reichert, T., Chretien, D., Severin, F. & Hyman, A. A. Structural changes at microtubule ends accompanying GTP hydrolysis: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue of GTP, guanylyl (α,β) methylenediphosphonate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3661-3666 (1998).
12. Gigant, B. et al. The 4Å X-ray structure of a tubulin:stathmin-like domain complex. Cell 102, 809-816 (2000).
13. Caplow, M., Ruhlen, R. L. & Shanks, J. The free energy for hydrolysis of a microtubule-bound nucleotide triphosphate is near zero: all of the free energy for hydrolysis is stored in the microtubule lattice. J. Cell Biol. 127, 779-788 (1994).
14. Howard, J. & Hyman, A. A. Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end. Nature 422, 753-758 (2003).
15. Mandelkow, E. M., Mandelkow, E. & Milligan, R. A. Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy study. J. Cell Biol. 114, 977-991 (1991).
16. Hyman, A. A., Salser, S., Drechsel, D. N., Unwin, N. & Mitchison, T. J. Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1155-1167 (1992).
17. Vigers, G. P., Coue, M. & McIntosh, J. R. Fluorescent microtubules break up under illumination. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1011-1024 (1988).
18. Allersma, M. W., Gittes, F., deCastro, M. J., Stewart, R. J. & Schmidt, C. F. Two-dimensional tracking of ncd motility by back focal plane interferometry. Biophys. J. 74, 1074-1085 (1998).
19. Visscher, K. & Block, S. M. Versatile optical traps with feedback control. Methods Enzymol. 298, 460-489 (1998).
20. Svoboda, K. & Block, S. M. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell 77, 773-784 (1994).
21. Westermann, S. et al. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell 17, 277-290 (2005).
22. Gildersleeve, R. F., Cross, A. R., Cullen, K. E., Fagen, A. P. & Williams, R. C. Jr Microtubules grow and shorten at intrinsically variable rates. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 7995-8006 (1992).
23. O'Brien, E. T., Salmon, E. D., Walker, R. A. & Erickson, H. P. Effects of magnesium on the dynamic instability of individual microtubules. Biochemistry 29, 6648-6656 (1990).
24. Walker, R. A. et al. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1437-1448 (1988).
25. Fygenson, D. K., Braun, E. & Libchaber, A. Phase diagram of microtubules. Phys. Rev. E 50, 1579-1588 (1994).
26. Hunt, A. J. & McIntosh, J. R. The dynamic behaviour of individual microtubules associated with chromosomes in vitro. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 249-261 (1998).
27. Miranda, J. L., De Wulf, P., Sorger, P. & Harrison, S. C. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 138-143 (2005).
28. Nicklas, R. B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275, 632-637 (1997).
29. McIntosh, J. R., Grishchuk, E. L. & West, R. R. Chromosome- microtubule interactions during mitosis. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 18, 193-219 (2002).
30. Brouhard, G. J., Schek, H. T. III & Hunt, A. J. Advanced optical tweezers for the study of cellular and molecular biomechanics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50, 121-125 (2003).