Open learner modelling as the keystone of the next generation of adaptive learning environments

Intelligent User Interfaces: Adaptation and Personalization Systems and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 288-312

  Morales, Rafael ^a   Van Labeke, Nicolas ^b,c   Brna, Paul ^d   Chan, María Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900162144     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-032-5.ch014     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. ADL. (2001). Sharable Content Object Reference Model Version 1.2: The SCORM Overview. Retrieved Nov 25, 2007, from http://adlnet.gov/downloads/AuthNoReqd.aspx?FileName=SCORM_1_2_pdf.zip&ID=240.
2. ADL. (2004a). Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM). Retrieved Nov 25, 2007, from http://www.adlnet.gov/dowloads/AuthNotReqd.aspx?FileName=SCORM.2004.3ED.DocSuit.zip&ID=237
3. ADL. (2004b). Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) Overview. Retrieved Nov 25, 2007, from http://www.adlnet.gov/donloads/Au-thNotReqd.aspx?FileName=SCORM.2004.3ED.DocSuite.zip&ID=237
4. ADL. (2004c). Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) Run Time Environment. Retrieved Nov 25, 2007, from http://www.adlnet.gov/dowloads/AuthNotReqd.aspx?FileName=SCORM.2004.3ED.DocSuite.zip&ID=237
5. Ausubel, D. P. (1995). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. London: Routledge.
6. Bates, T. (2005). Technology, e learning and distance education. London: Routledge.
7. Brooks, C., Greer, J., Melis, E., & Ullrich, C. (2006). Combining ITS and e-learning technologies: opportunities and challenges. In M. Ikeda, K. Ashley & T-W. Chan (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006 (pp. 278-287). Berlin: Springer.
8. Brooks, C., Winter, C. M., Greer, J., & McCalla, G. (2004). The massive user modelling system (MUMS). In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 7th International Conference, ITS 2004 (pp. 635-645). Berlin: Springer.
9. Brusilovsky, P. (2004). KnowledgeTree: A distributed architecture for adaptive e-learning. Paper presented at the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, Alternate Track Papers & Posters.
10. Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2007). Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI Open Learner Modelling Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(3), 89-120.
11. Bull, S., Brna, P., & Pain, H. (1995). Extending the Scope of the Student Model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5(1), 45-65.
12. Bull, S., Quigley, S., & Mabbott, A. (2006). Computer-Based Formative Assessment to Promote Reflection and Learner Autonomy. Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, 1(1), 1-18.
13. Buswell, S., Caprotti, O., Carlisle, D.P., Dewar, M. G., & Kohlhase, M. (2004). The OpenMath Standard (Standard): The OpenMath Society.
14. Carbonell, J. R. (1970). AI in CAI: An artificial intelligence approach to computer assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man Machine Systems, MMS-11(4), 190-202.
15. Cook, R., & Kay, J. (1994). The Justified User Model: A Viewable, explained user model. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 145-150). Hyannis MA, The MITRE Corporation.
16. Chan Núñez, M. E. (2004). Modelo mediacional para el diseño educativo en línea. Guadalajara, Jalisco: INNOVA, Universidad de Guadalajara.
17. Devedzic, V. B. (2003). Key issues in next-generation Web-based education. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews, 33(3), 339-349.
18. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2005). Contexts in Educational Topic Maps. In C.K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.), 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 789-791). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
19. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Development. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
20. Freire, P. (1999). Psicología del Oprimido. México City: Editorial Siglo XXI.
21. Gibbons, A. S., & Fairweather, P. G. (2000). Computer-based instruction. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training & Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military: MacMillan Reference Books.
22. Gonczi, A., & Athanasou, J. (1996). Instrumentación de la educación basada en competencias. Perspectivas de la teoría y la práctica en Australia. In A. Argüelles (Ed.), Competencia laboral y educación basada en normas de competencia (pp. 265-288). México: Limusa y Noriega Editores.
23. IEEE. (2002). 1484.12.1 Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata.
24. Kay, J., & Lum, A. (2004). Ontologies for scrutable student modelling in adaptive e-learning. In L. Aroyo & D. Dicheva (Eds.), Proceedings of the AH (Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive WebBased Systems) 2004 Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies (pp. 292-301). Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, TU/e Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2004.
25. Kobsa, A., & Pohl, W. (1995). The BGP-MS User Modeling System. User Modeling and UserAdapted Interaction, 4(2), 59-106.
26. Kohlhase, M. (Artist). (2005). OMDoc: An Open Markup Format for Mathematical Documents
27. Kohlhase, M. (2006). OMDoc-An Open Markup Format for Mathematical Documents (version 1.2): Springer Verlag.
28. LeActiveMath Consortium. (2007). LanguageEnhanced, User-Adaptive, Interactive eLearning for Mathematics. Retrieved June 22, 2007, from http://www.leactivemath.org
29. Melis, E., Andrès, E., Büdenbender, J., Frischauf, A., Gogaudze, G., Libbrecht, P., et al. (2001). ActiveMath: A Generic and Adaptive WebBased Learning Environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 385-407.
30. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2007). Evaluating the Effect of Open Student Models on Self-Assessment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(3), 121-144.
31. Morales, R., Van Labeke, N., & Brna, P. (2006). Approximate Modelling of the Multi-dimensional Learner. In M. Ikeda, K. Ashley, & T-W. Chan (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006 (pp. 555-564). LNCS 4053. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
32. Morales, R., Pain, H., Bull, S., & Kay, J. (1999). Open, interactive, and other overt approaches to learner modelling. AIED Resources, 10, 1070-1079.
33. OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Paris, France: OECD Press.
34. Paiva, A., & Self, J. A. (1995). TAGUS - A User and Learner Modeling Workbench. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(3), 197-226.
35. Picard, R. W., Kort, B., & Reilly, R. (2007). Exploring the Role of Emotion in Propelling the SMET Learning Process. NSF Project Summary and Description Retrieved Nov 23, 2007, from http://affect.media.mit.edu/projectpages/lc/nsf1.html
36. Polson, M. C., & Richardson, J. J. (Eds.). (1988). Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Self, J. (1988). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In C. Frasson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems ITS'88 (pp. 18-24). Montreal, Canada.
39. Self, J. (1999). The Defining Characteristics of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Research: ITSs Care, Precisely. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 350-364.
40. Shafer, G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence: Princeton University Press.
41. Tchetagni, J., Nkambou, R., & Bourdeau, J. (2007). Explicit Reflection in Prolog-Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(3), 169-215.
42. TopicMaps.org. (2001). XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 (Specification): TopicMaps.org.
43. Toulmin, S. (1959). The Uses of Arguments: Cambridge University Press.
44. UDG Virtual. (2004). El modelo educativo de UDGVirtual. Guadalajara, Jalisco: Universidad de Guadalajara.
45. Van Labeke, N., Brna, P., & Morales, R. (2007). Opening up the Interpretation Process in an Open Learner Model. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(3), 305-338.
46. Vygotsky, L. (1996). Thought and Language: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems. California: Morgan Kaufmann.
48. Zapata-Rivera, J.-D., & Greer, J. (2004). Inspectable Bayesian Student Modelling Servers in Multiagent Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(535-563).
49. Zapata-Rivera, D., Hansen, E., Shute, V. J., Underwood, J. S., & Bauer, M. (2007). Evidence-based Approach to Interacting with Open Student Models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(3), 273-303.