Cognitive reflection and socially biased decisions

Studia Psychologica

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 265-271

  Baldi, Pier Luigi ^b   Iannello, Paola ^b   Riva, Silvia ^a,b   Antonietti, Alessandro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cognitive reflection; Decision biases; Decision making; Social influence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900116082     PISSN: 00393320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21909/sp.2013.04.641     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BERGMAN, O., ELLINGSEN, T., JOHANNESSEN, M., SVENSSON, C., 2010, Anchoring and cognitive ability. Economic Letters, 107, 66-68.
2. CAMPITELLI, G., LABOLLITA, M., 2010, Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgements and choices. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 182-191.
3. EVANS, J.St.B.T., 2008, Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
4. FREDERICK, S., 2005, Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
5. GIGERENZER, G., BRIGHTON, H., 2009, Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107-143.
6. HOPPE, E.I., KUSTERER, D.J., 2011, Behavioural biases and cognitive reflection. Economic Letters, 110, 97-100.
7. JACKSON, L.A., SULLIVAN, L.A., HODGE, C.N., 1993, Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgements are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69-84.
8. JAUNCHICH, M., SIROTA, M., BUTLER, C.L., 2012, The perceived functions of linguistic risk quantifiers and their effect on risk, negativity per- ception and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 72-81.
9. KAHNEMAN, D., 2011, Thinking. Fast and slow. New York: MacMillan.
10. KRUEGER, J.I., FUNDER, D.C., 2004, Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behaviour and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 313-327.
11. LIBERALI, J.M., REYNA, V.F., FURLAN, S., STEIN, L.M., PARDO, S.T., 2012, Individual differences in numeracy, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 361-381.
12. MACLEOD, C., CAMPBELL, L., 1992, Memory accessibility and probability judgements: An experimental evaluation of the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 890-902.
13. MANIS, M., NELSON, T.E., SHEDLER, J., 1988, Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 28-36.
14. OECHSSLER, J., ROIDER, A., SCHMITZ, P.W., 2009, Cognitive abilities and behavioural biases. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 72, 147-152.
15. OREG, S., BAYAZIT, M., 2009, Prone to bias: Development of a bias taxonomy from the perspective of individual differences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 175-193.
16. SIROTA, M., JUANCHICH, M., 2011, Role of numeracy and cognitive reflection in Bayesian reasoning with natural frequencies. Studia Psychologica, 53, 2, 151-161.
17. STANOVICH, K.E., WEST, R.F., 2000, Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
18. STANOVICH, K.E., WEST R.F., 2008, On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672-695.
19. TOPLAK, M.E., WEST, R.F., STANOVICH, K.E., 2011, The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory and Cognition, 39, 1275-1289.
20. TVERSKY, A., KAHNEMAN, D., 1974, Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.