Invasiveness in exotic plants: Immigration and naturalization in an ecological continuum

Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology: Reciprocal Approaches to Nature

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 65-105

  Murphy, Helen T ^a   Vanderwal, Jeremy ^a   Lovett Doust, Lesley ^a   Lowtt Doust, Jon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900104499     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4925-0_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (108)

1. Akcakaya, H. R. and P. Sjogren-Gulve. 2000. Population viability analysis in conservation planning: An overview. Ecological Bulletin 48, 9-21.
2. Anderson, P. K., A. A. Cunningham, N. G. Patel, F. J. Morales, P. R. Epstein and P. Daszak. 2004. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 535-544.
3. Baker, H. G. 1965. Characteristics and mode oforigin ofweeds. pp. 147-168 in H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins, editors. The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, NY.
4. Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution ofweeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 1-24.
5. Barney, J. N. and A. DiTommaso. 2003. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 118. Artemisia vulgaris L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 205-215.
6. Blackburn, T. M. and R. P. Duncan. 2001a. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414, 195-19 7.
7. Blackburn, T. M. and R. P. Duncan. 2001b. Establishment patterns of exotic birds are constrained by non-random patterns in introduction. Journal of Biogeography 28, 927-939.
8. Brook B. W., J.J. O'Grady, A. P. Chapman, M. A. Burgman.H. R. Akcakaya and R.Frankham. 2000. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404, 385-387.
9. Bruno, J. F., J. J. Stachowicz and M. D. Bertness. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 119-125.
10. Cadotte, M. W. and J. Lovett-Doust. 2001. Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario. Ecoscience 8, 230-238.
11. Cadotte, M. W., B. R. Murray and J. Lovett-Doust. Evolutionary and ecological factors influencing Ontario plant invader success. Ecoscience (in press).
12. Cadotte, M. W., B. R. Murray and J. Lovett-Doust. 2005. Ecological patterns and biological invasions: Using regional species inventories in macroecology. Biological Invasions 8, 1-13.
13. Callaway, R. M. and E. T. Aschehoug. 2000. Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: A mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290, 521-523.
14. Carr, G. W. 1993. Exotic flora of Victoria and its impact on indigenous biota, pp. 256-29 7 in D. B. Foreman and N. G. Walsh, editors. Flora of Victoria. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.
15. Case, T. J. 1990. Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 87, 96109614.
16. Cavers, P. B., editor. 1995. The Biology of Canadian Weeds, Vol. 3. Contributions 62-83.
17. The Agricultural Institute of Canada, Ottawa, ON. Cavers, P. B., editor. 2000. The Biology of Canadian Weeds, Vol. 4. Contributions 84-102. The Agricultural Institute of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
18. Cavers, B. P. and S. Warwick. 2000. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. Revised format and instructions for preparation of updated accounts. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 80, 23 7-240.
19. Clements, D. R., M. K. Upadhyaya and S. J. Bos. 1999. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 110. Tragopogón dubius Scop., Tragopogón pratensís L., and Tragopogón porrífolíus L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 79, 153-163.
20. Colautti, R. I. and H. J. Maclsaac. 2004. A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species. Diversity and Distributions 10, 135-141.
21. Daehler, C. C. 1998. The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: Ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biological Conservation 84, 167-180.
22. Daehler, C. C. 2001a. Two ways to be an invader, but one is more suitable for ecology. ESA Bulletin 82, 101-102.
23. Daehler, C. C. 2001b. Darwin's naturalization hypothesis revisited. American Naturalist 158, 324-329.
24. Darbyshire, S. J., R. Hoeg and J. Haverkort. 1999. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 111. Anthríscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 79, 671-682.
25. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. Murray, London.
26. Davis, M. A. and K. Thompson. 2000. Eight ways to be a colonizer; two ways to be an invader: A proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. ESA Bulletin 81, 226-230.
27. Davis, M. A. and K. Thompson. 2001. Invasion terminology: should ecologists define their terms differently than others? No, not if we want to be of any help! ESA Bulletin 82, 206.
28. Davis, M. A. and K. Thompson. 2002. "Newcomers" invade the field of invasion ecology: question the field's future. ESA Bulletin 83, 196-197.
29. Eckert, G. C, D. Manicacci and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Genetic drift and founder effect in native versus introduced populations of an invading plant, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Evolution 50, 1512-1519.
30. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London.
31. Forsyth, D. M. and R. P. Duncan. 2001. Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. The American Naturalist 157, 583-595.
32. Foxcroft, L. C, M. Rouget, D. M. Richardson and S. Mac Fayden. 2004. Reconstructing 50 years of Opuntia stricta invasion in the Kruger National Park, South Africa: environmental determinants and propagule pressure. Diversity and Distributions 10, 42 7-43 7.
33. Francis, A. and S. I. Warwick. 2003. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 120. Neslia paniculata (L.) Desv. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 441-451.
34. Freckleton, R. P. and Watkinson, A. R. 2002. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. Journal of Ecology 90, 419-434.
35. Gleason, H. A. 1952. The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Hafner Press, New York.
36. Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Second Edition. New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY.
37. Gotelli, N. and C. M. Taylor. 1999a. Testing metapopulation models with stream-fish assemblages. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1, 835-845.
38. Gotelli, N. and C. M. Taylor. 1999b. Testing macroecology models with stream-fish assemblages. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1, 847-858.
39. Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics-concepts, models and observations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 17-38.
40. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63, 151-162.
41. Harrod, R. J. and R. J. Taylor. 1995. Reproduction and pollination biology of Centaurea and Acroptilon species, with emphasis on C. diffusa. Northwest Science 69, 9 7-105.
42. Higgins, S. I., R. Nathan and M. L. Cain. 2003. Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84, 1945-1956.
43. Kareiva, P. and Wennergren, U. 1995. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373, 299-303.
44. Keane, R. M. and M. J. Crawley. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 164-170.
45. Klemow, K. M., D. R. Clements, P. F. Threadgill and P. B. Cavers. 2002. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 116. Echium vulgare L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 235-248.
46. Klironomos, J. N. 2002. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417, 67-70.
47. Kolar, S. C. and D. M. Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 199-204.
48. Kolbe, J. J., E. E. Glor, L. R. Schettino, A. C. Lara, A. Larson and J. B. Losos. 2004. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431, 177-181.
49. Kowarik I. 1995. Clonal growth in Ailanthus altissima on a natural site in West Virginia. Journal of Vegetation Science 6, 853-856.
50. Krebs, C. J. 1985. Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
51. Levin, D. A. 2003. Ecological speciation: lessons from invasive species. Systematic Botany 28, 643-650.
52. Levine, J. M., P. B. Adler and S. G. Yelenik. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecology Letters 7, 975-989.
53. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15, 237-240.
54. Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 133-137.
55. Lonsdale, M. W. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80, 1522-1536.
56. Mack, R. N. 1996. Predicting the identity and the fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78, 107-121.
57. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10, 689-710.
58. Mal, T. K., Lovett-Doust, B., L. Lovett-Doust and G. A. Mulligan. 1992. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 100. Lythrum salicaria. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 72, 13051330.
59. Maron, J. L. and Vila, M. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95, 361-373.
60. Master, L. L. 1991. Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology 5, 559-563.
61. McNeill, J. 1977. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 25. Silene alba (Miller) E. H. L. Krause. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 57, 1103-1114.
62. Mersereau, D. and A. DiTommaso. 2001. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 121. Galium mollugo L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 453-465.
63. Mitchell, C. E. and A. G. Power. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421, 625-627.
64. Morris, W. F. and D. F. Doak. 2003. Quantitative conservation biology: theory and practice ofpopulation viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
65. Moilanen, A. 1999. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: Efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. Ecology 80, 1031-1043.
66. Moilanen, A. 2000. The equilibrium assumption in estimating the parameters of metapopulation models. Journal of Animal Ecology 69, 143-153.
67. Moilanen, A., A. T. Smith and I. Hanski. 1998. Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation ofthe American pika. American Naturalist 152, 530-542.
68. Morton, J. K. and J. M. Venn. 1990. A checklist of the flora of Ontario-Vascular plants. University of Waterloo Biology Series No. 34, Waterloo, ON.
69. Mulligan, G. A., editor. 1979. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. Contributions 1-32. Agriculture Canada Publ. 1693, Ottawa, ON.
70. Mulligan, G. A., editor. 1984. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. Contributions 33-61. Agriculture Canada Publ. 1765, Ottawa, ON.
71. Murphy, H. T. and J. Lovett-Doust. 2004. Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter? Oikos 105, 3-14.
72. Natural Heritage Information Centre. 2004. Database of vascular plants. http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/nhic/nhic.cfm
73. Newmaster, S. G., A. Lehela, M. J. Oldham, P. W. C. Uhlig and S. McMurray. 1998. Ontario plant list. Forest Research Information Paper No. 123; Ontario Forest Research Institute, Sault Ste. Marie, ON.
74. Novak, S. J. and R. N. Mack. 1993. Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): comparison between native and introduced populations. Heredity 71, 167-176.
75. Pysek, P. 1998. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82, 282-294.
76. Pysek, P., D. M. Richardson, M. Rejmanek, G. L. Webster, M. Williamson and J. Kirschner. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53, 131-143.
77. Rabinowitz, D. 1981. Seven forms ofrarity. pp. 205-218 in H. Synge, editor. The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, New York, NY.
78. Reinhart, K. O., A. Packer, W. H. Van der Putten and K. Clay. 2003. Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecology Letters 6, 1046-1050.
79. Rejmanek, M. 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biological Conservation 78, 171-181.
80. Rejmanek, M. and D. M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77, 1655-1661.
81. Rejmanek, M., D. M. Richardson, M. G. Barbour, M. J. Crawley, G. F. Hrusa, P. B, Moyle, J. M. Randal, D. Simberloff and M. Williamson. 2002. Biological invasions: politics and the discontinuity ofthe ecological terminology. ESA Bulletin 83, 131-133.
82. Richardson, D. M., P. Pysek, M. Rejmanek, M. G. Barbour, F. D. Panetta and C. J. West. 2000a. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6, 93-107.
83. Richardson, D. M., N. Allsopp, C. M. D'Antonio, S. J. Milton and M. Rejmanek. 2000b. Plant invasions-the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews 75, 65-93.
84. Robinson, D. E., J. T. O'Donovan, M. P. Sharma, D. J. Doohan and R. Figueroa. 2003. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 123. Senecio vulgaris L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 629-644.
85. Rouget, M. and D. M. Richardson. 2003. Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semi-mechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. American Naturalist 162, 713-724.
86. Saner, M. A., D. R. Clements, M. R. Hall, D. J. Doohan and C. W. Crompton. 1995. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 105. Linaria vulgaris Mill. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 75, 525-537.
87. Sax, D. F. and J. H. Brown. 2000. The paradox of invasion. Global Ecology and Biogeography 9, 363-371.
88. Shaffer, M. L. 1981. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience 31, 131-134.
89. Scoggan, H. J. 1979. The flora of Canada. National Museums of Canada. Ottawa, ON.
90. Simberloff, D. and B. von Holle. 1999. Positive interactions of non-indigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1, 21-32.
91. Small, E. and P. B. Cavers. 2002. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 119. Cannabis sativa L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 217-237.
92. Stewart-Wade, S. M., S. Neumann, L. L. Collins and G. J. Boland. 2002. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 117. Taraxacum officinale G. H. Weber ex Wiggers. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 825-853.
93. Stohlgren T. J., D. Binkley, G. W. Chong, M. A. Kalkhan, L. D. Schell, K. A. Bull, Y. Otsuki, G. Newman, M. Bashkin and Y. Son. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 69, 25-46.
94. Thompson, K., J. G. Hodgson and T. C. G. Rich. 1995. Native and alien invasive plants: more ofthe same? Ecography 18, 390-402.
95. Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78, 81-92.
96. Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burgess, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A. Webb. 1964. Flora Europaea, Vol 1. Lycopodiaceae to Platanaceae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
97. Turkington, R. A., P. B. Cavers and E. Rempel. 1978. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 29. Melilotus alba Besr. and M. officinalis (L.) Lam. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 523-537.
98. Vander Wall, S. B. and W. S. Longland. 2004. Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 155-161.
99. Vitousek, P. M. and L. R. Walker. 1989. Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawai'i: Plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecological Monographs 59, 247-265.
100. Von Holle, B., H. R. Delcourt and D. Simberloff. 2003. The importance of biological inertia in plant community resistance to invasion. Journal ofVegetation Science 14, 425-432.
101. Vujnovic, K. and R. W. Wein. 1997. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 106. Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 77, 483-491.
102. Wahlberg, N., A Moilanen and I. Hanski. 1996. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273, 1536-1538.
103. Warwick, S. I. and L. D. Black. 1983. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 61. Sorghum hala-pense (L.) Pers. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63, 997-1014.
104. Warwick, S. L, H. J. Beckie, G. A. Thomas and T. McDonald. 2000. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 8. Sinapsis arvensis L. (updated). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 80, 939-961.
105. Warwick, S. I. and D. A. Wall. 1998. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 108. Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O. E. Schulz. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78, 155-165.
106. Warwick, S. I., A. Francis and D. J. Susko. 2002. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 9. Thlaspi arvense L. (updated). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 830-823.
107. Weaver, S. E. and M. P. Downs. 2003. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 122. Lactuca ser-riola L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 619-628.
108. Williamson, M. and A. Fitter. 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77, 1661-1666.