Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms

Scandinavian Journal of Management

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 197-213

  Hanisch, Bastian ^a   Wald, Andreas ^b,c  

^a Horváth and oPartners Management Consultants ^*  (Germany)

^b European Business School Paris   (France)

^c Strascheg Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complexity; Coordination; Project; Temporary organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899926943     PISSN: 09565221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2013.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Adler P.S. Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science 2001, 12:215-234.
2. Akgün A.E., Lynn G.S. Antecedents and consequences of team stability on new product development performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 2002, 19:263-286.
3. Alvesson M., Kärreman D., Sturdy A., Handley K. Unpacking the client(s): Constructions, positions and client-consultant dynamics. Scandinavian Journal of Management 2009, 25:253-263.
4. Ancona D.G., Caldwell D.F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 1992, 37:634-665.
5. Ancona D.G., Okhuysen G.A., Perlow L.A. Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review 2001, 26:512-529.
6. Anderson P.W. Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science 1999, 10:216-232.
7. Andres H.P., Zmud R.W. A contingency approach to software project coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems 2002, 18:41-70.
8. Appelbaum S.H., Steed A.J. The critical success factors in the client-consulting relationship. Journal of Management Development 2005, 24:68-93.
9. Argote L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly 1982, 27:420-434.
10. Argote L. Group and organizational learning curves: Individual system and environmental components. British Journal of Social Psychology 1993, 32:31-51.
11. Atkinson R., Crawford H., Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management 2006, 24:687-698.
12. Aubert B.A., Kelsey B.L. Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research 2003, 34:575-618.
13. Baccarini D. The concept of project complexity-A review. International Journal of Project Management 1996, 14:201-204.
14. Baccarini D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal 1999, 30:25-32.
15. Bakker R.M. Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 2010, 12:466-486.
16. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
17. Bechky B.A. Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science 2006, 17:3-21.
18. Bengtsson M., Müllern T., Söderholm A., Wahlin N. A grammar of organizing 2007, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
19. Bigley G.A., Roberts K.H. The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44:1281-1299.
20. Bishop J.W., Scott K.D., Burroughs S.M. Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment. Journal of Management 2000, 26:1113-1132.
21. Blount S., Janicik G.A. When plans change: Examining how people evaluate timing changes in work organizations. Academy of Management Review 2001, 26:566-585.
22. Brockhoff K. On the novelty dimension in project management. Project Management Journal 2006, 37:26-36.
23. Brown S.L., Eisenhardt K.M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 1997, 42:1-34.
24. Campbell D.J. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review 1988, 13:40-52.
25. Cattani G., Ferriani S., Frederiksen L., Täube F. Project-based organizing and strategic management: A long-term research agenda on temporary organizational forms. Project-based organizing and strategic management 2011, xv-xxxix. Emerald, Bingley. G. Cattani, S. Ferriani, L. Frederiksen, F. Täube (Eds.).
26. Chin W.W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 1998, 22:vii-xvi.
27. Chin W.W., Newsted P.R. Structural equation modelling analysis with small sample using partial least squares. Statistical strategies for small sample research 1999, 307-342. Sage, Thousand Oaks. R.H. Hoyle (Ed.).
28. Clark K.B. Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product evelopment. Management Science 1989, 35:1247-1263.
29. Clark K.B., Fujimoto T. Lead time in automobile product development: Explaining the Japanese advantage. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 1989, 6:25-58.
30. Clegg S., Courpasson D. Political hybrids: Tocquevillean views on project organizations. Journal of Management Studies 2004, 41:525-547.
31. Cicmil S., Hodgson D., Lindgren M., Packendorff J. Project management behind the façade. Ephemera 2009, 9:78-92.
32. Cliff T.B., Vandenbosch M. Project complexity and efforts to reduce product development cycle time. Journal of Business Research 1999, 45:187-198.
33. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
34. Collins A., Baccarini D. Project success-A survey. Journal of Construction Research 2004, 5:211-231.
35. Crawford L., Pollack J., England D. Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years. International Journal of Project Management 2006, 24:175-184.
36. Daft R.L., Lengel R.H. Organizational information requirement, media richness and structural designs. Management Science 1986, 32:554-571.
37. Dahlander L., O'Mahony S. Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organization Science 2011, 22:961-979.
38. Dalton D.R., Todor W.D., Spendolini M.J., Fielding G.J., Porter L.W. Organization structure and performance: A critical review. Academy of Management Review 1980, 5:49-64.
39. D'Aveni R.A. Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering 1994, Free Press, New York.
40. de Wit A. Measurement of project success. International Journal of Project Management 1988, 6:164-170.
41. Dekker H.C. Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2004, 29:27-49.
42. Denison D.R., Hart S.L., Kahn J.A. From chimneys to crossfunctional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39:1005-1023.
43. Diamantopoulos A., Winkelhofer H. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research 2001, 38:269-277.
44. Doty G.H., Glick W.H. Common methods bias: Does common methods variance recall bias results?. Organization Research Methods 1988, 1:374-406.
45. Duncan R.B. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly 1972, 17:313-327.
46. Dvir D., Lechler T. Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Research Policy 2004, 33:1-15.
47. Dvir D., Lipovetsky S., Shenhar A., Tishler A. In search of project classification: A non-universal approach to project success factors. Research Policy 1998, 27:915-935.
48. Eisenhardt K.M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14:57-74.
49. Ekstedt E., Lundin R.A., Söderholm A., Wirdenius H. Neo-industrial organizing: Renewal by action and knowledge formation in a project-intensive economy 1999, Routledge, London.
50. Elsner W. The new economy: Complexity, coordination and a hybrid governance approach. International Journal of Social Economics 2004, 31:1029-1049.
51. Farjoun M. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review 2010, 35:202-225.
52. Ford C. Developing a successful client-consulting relationship. Clients & consultants: Meeting and exceeding expectations 1985, 8-21. Gulf Publishing, Houston. C.R. Bell, L.N. Nadler (Eds.).
53. Fornell C.D., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18:39-50.
54. Galbraith J.R. Designing complex organisations 1973, Addison-Wesley, Reading.
55. Geisser S. The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1975, 70:320-328.
56. Gladstein D.L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29:499-517.
57. Geraldi J., Maylor H., Williams T. Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2011, 31:966-990.
58. Glückler J., Armbrüster T. Bridging uncertainty in management consulting: The mechanisms of trust and networked reputation. Organization Studies 2003, 24:269-297.
59. Goodman P.S., Leyden D.P. Familiarity and group productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 1991, 76:578-586.
60. Goodman R.A., Goodman L.P. Some management issues in temporary systems: A study of professional development and manpower-The theater case. Administrative Science Quarterly 1976, 21:494-501.
61. Grabher G. Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies 2004, 25:1491-1514.
62. Greenwood R., Li S.X., Prakash R., Deephouse D.L. Reputation, diversification, and organizational explanations of performance in professional service firms. Organization Science 2005, 16:661-673.
63. Grewal R., Lilien G.L., Mallapragada G. Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Science 2006, 52:1043-1056.
64. Hackman J.R. The design of work teams. Handbook of organizational behavior 1987, 67-102. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. J.W. Lorsch (Ed.).
65. Hanisch B., Wald A. A project management research framework integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors. Project Management Journal 2011, 42:4-22.
66. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Gavin J.H., Florey A.T. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45:1029-1045.
67. Hobday M. The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?. Research Policy 2000, 29:871-893.
68. Hodgson D.E. Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization 2004, 11:81-100.
69. Hodgson D., Cicmil S. The politics of standards in modern management: Making 'the project' a reality. Journal of Management Studies 2007, 44:431-450.
70. Hoegl M., Gemuenden H.G. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science 2001, 12:435-449.
71. Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:195-204.
72. Ilinitch A.Y., D'Aveni R.A., Lewin A.Y. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science 1996, 7:211-220.
73. Ivory C., Alderman N. Can project management learn anything from studies of failure in complex systems?. Project Management Journal 2005, 36:5-16.
74. Jacobides M.G., Croson D.C. Information policy: Shaping the value of agency relationships. Academy of Management Review 2001, 26:202-223.
75. Janowicz-Panjaitan M., Bakker R.M., Kenis P. Research on temporary organizations: The state of the art and distinct approaches toward temporariness. Temporary organizations: Prevalence, logic and effectiveness 2009, 56-85. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. P. Kenis, M. Janowicz-Panjaitan, B. Cambré (Eds.).
76. Jarvenpaa S.L., Leidner D.E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science 1999, 10:791-815.
77. Jarvis C.B., MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff P.M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 2003, 30:199-218.
78. Jassawalla A.R., Sashittal H.C. An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1998, 15:237-254.
79. Jassawalla A.R., Sashittal H.C. Building collaborative cross-functional new product teams. Academy of Management Executive 1999, 13:50-63.
80. Jehn K.A., Mannix E.A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44:238-251.
81. Jones R.E., Deckro R.F. The social psychology of project management conflict. European Journal of Operational Research 1993, 64:216-228.
82. Jones C., Hesterly W.S., Borgatti S.P. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22:911-945.
83. Kahn K.B., McDonough E.F. An empirical study of the relationships among colocation, integration, performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1997, 14:161-178.
84. Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 1982, 27:81-104.
85. Katz R., Allen T.J. Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Academy of Management Journal 1985, 28:67-87.
86. Keller R.T. Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Academy of Management Journal 1994, 37:167-179.
87. Kim J., Wilemon D. Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R&D Management 2003, 33:16-30.
88. Kirsch L.J. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science 1996, 7:1-21.
89. Koskinen K., Pihlanto P. Knowledge management in project-based companies an organic perspective 2008, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
90. Lawrence P.R., Lorsch J.W. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration 1967, Harvard University, Boston.
91. Levin D.Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science 2004, 50:1477-1490.
92. Lindner F., Wald A. Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management 2011, 29:877-888.
93. Lim C.S., Mohamed M.Z. Criteria of project success: An exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management 1999, 17:243-248.
94. Lohmöller J.-B. Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares 1989, Springer, Heidelberg.
95. Luhmann N. Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations 2000, 94-107. Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. D. Gambetta (Ed.).
96. Lundin R.A., Midler C. Evolution of project as empirical trend and theoretical focus. Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes 1998, 1-9. Kluwer, Norwell. R. Lundin, C. Midler (Eds.).
97. Lundin R.A., Söderholm A. A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1995, 11:437-455.
98. Lundin R.A., Steinthorsson R.S. Studying organizations as temporary. Scandinavian Journal of Management 2003, 19:233-250.
99. Maaninen-Olsson E., Müllern T. A contextual understanding of projects: The importance of space and time. Scandinavian Journal of Management 2009, 25:327-339.
100. Mann H.B., Whitney D.R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1947, 18:50-60.
101. Maurer I. How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management 2010, 28:629-637.
102. Maylor H. Beyond the Gantt chart: Project management moving on. European Management Journal 2001, 19:92-100.
103. McAllister D.J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38:24-59.
104. Meyerson, Weick D., Kramer K.E. Swift trust and temporary groups. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research 1996, 166-195. Sage, Thousand Oaks. R.M. Kramer, T.R. Tylor (Eds.).
105. Midler C. Projectification of the firm: The Renault case. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1995, 11:363-375.
106. Modig N. A continuum of organizations formed to carry out projects: Temporary and stationary organization forms. International Journal of Project Management 2007, 25:807-814.
107. Moldoveanu M.C. An intersubjective measure of organisational complexity: A new approach to the study of complexity in organizations. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 2004, 6:9-16.
108. Morel B., Ramanujam R. Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science 1999, 10:278-293.
109. Müller R., Turner J.R. The impact of principal-agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. International Journal of Project Management 2005, 23:398-403.
110. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23:242-266.
111. Kloppenborg T.J., Opfer W.A. The current state of project management research: Trends, interpretations, and predictions. Project Management Journal 2002, 33:5-18.
112. Orlikowski W.J., Yates J. It's about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science 2002, 13:684-700.
113. Packendorff J. Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management 1995, 11:319-333.
114. Pauget B., Wald A. Relational competence in complex temporary organizations: The case of a French hospital construction project network. International Journal of Project Management 2013, 31:200-211.
115. Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review 1967, 32:194-208.
116. Pich M.T., Loch C.H., Meyer A.D. On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science 2002, 48:1008-1023.
117. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:879-903.
118. Powell W.W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 1990, 12:295-336.
119. Raisch S., Birkinshaw J., Probst G., Tushman M.L. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science 2009, 20:685-695.
120. Ringle C.M., Wende S., Will A. SmartPLS 2.0 M3: Software for partial least squares (PLS) path modeling 2005, SmartPLS, Hamburg.
121. Ruigrok W., Pettigrew A., Peck S., Whittington R. Corporate restructuring and new forms of organizing: Evidence from Europe. Management International Review 1999, 39:41-64.
122. Santiago L.P., Vakili P. On the value of flexibility in R&D projects. Management Science 2005, 51:1206-1218.
123. Schreyögg G., Sydow J. Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science 2010, 21:1251-1262.
124. Sharma A. Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22:758-798.
125. Shenhar A.J. One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science 2001, 47:394-414.
126. Shenhar A.J., Dvir D. Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy 1996, 25:607-632.
127. Shenhar A.J., Dvir D., Levy O., Maltz A.C. Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning 2001, 34:699-725.
128. Sobel M.E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology 1982, 13:290-312. John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco.
129. Sommer S.C., Loch C.H. Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Science 2004, 50:1334-1347.
130. Sundstrom E., DeMeuse K.P., Futrell D. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist 1990, 45:120-133.
131. Sydow J., Lindkvist L., DeFillippi R. Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge. Organization Studies 2004, 25:1475-1489.
132. Tansley C., Newell S. Project social capital, leadership and trust: A study of human resource information systems development. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2007, 22:350-368.
133. Tatikonda M.Y., Rosenthal S.R. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: A deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2000, 47:74-87.
134. Thompson J.D. Organizations in action 1967, McGraw-Hill, New York.
135. Tidd J. Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews 2001, 3:169-183.
136. Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 1998, 41:464-476.
137. Tsoukas H., Chia R. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science 2002, 13:567-582.
138. Tung R.L. Dimensions of organizational environments: An exploratory study of their impact on organization structure. Academy of Management Journal 1979, 22:672-693.
139. Turner J.R., Cochrane R.A. Goals-and-methods matrix: Coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project Management 1993, 11:93-102.
140. Turner J.R., Müller R. Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent. European Management Journal 2004, 22:327-336.
141. Tushman M.L. Technical communication in R&D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal 1978, 21:624-645.
142. Tushman M.L., Nadler D.A. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review 1978, 3:613-624.
143. Vidal L.-A., Marle F. Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes 2008, 37:1094-2001.
144. Vlaar P.W., Van den Bosch F.A., Volberda H.W. On the evolution of trust, distrust, and formal coordination and control in interorganizational relationships. Group & Organization Management 2007, 32:407-428.
145. von Nordenflycht A. What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review 2010, 35:155-174.
146. Watson W.E., Johnson L., Kumar K., Critelli J. Process gain and process loss: comparing interpersonal processes and performance of culturally diverse and non-diverse teams across time. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 1998, 16:53-65.
147. Williams C.C. Trust diffusion: The effect of interpersonal trust on structure, function, and organizational transparency. Business & Society 2005, 44:357-368.
148. Williams T.M. The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management 1999, 17:269-273.
149. Zwikael O., Unger-Aviram E. HRM in project groups: The effect of project duration on team development effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management 2010, 28:413-421.