New Organizational Forms and Strategies for Managing in Hypercompetitive Environments

Organization Science

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 211-220

  Ilinitch, Anne Y ^a   D'Aveni, Richard A ^a   Lewin, Arie Y ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030522875     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.7.3.211     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Aupperle, K. E. (1996), "Spontaneous Organizational Reconfiguration: A Historical Example Based on Xenophon's Anabasis," Organization Science, 7, 4, 444-460.
2. Cohen, M. D., J. G. March, and J. P. Olsen (1972), "A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choices," Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
3. Craig, T. (1996), "The Japanese Beer Wars: Initiating and Responding to Hypercompetition in New Product Development," Organization Science, 7, 3, 302-322.
4. Cyert, R. and J. G. March (1964), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, London: Blackwell Publishers.
5. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994), Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering, New York: The Free Press.
6. Daft, R. L. and A. Y. Lewin (1990), "Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay," Organization Science, 1, 1, 1-9.
7. _ and _ (1993), "Where Are the Theories for the 'New' Organizational Forms? An Editorial Essay," Organizational Science, 1, 1, i-vi.
8. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), "Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High Velocity Environments," Academy of Management Journal, 32, 3, 543-577.
9. Galunic, D. C. and K. M. Eisenhardt (1996), "The Evolution of Intracorporate Domains: Divisional Charter Losses in High-Technology, Multidivisional Corporations," Organization Science, 7, 3, 255-282.
10. Ghemewat, P. (1991), "Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia," Marketing Science, 10, 2 (Spring), 161-171.
11. Gimeno, J. and C. Y. Woo (1996), "Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact on Competitive De-escalation," Organization Science, 7, 3, 323-341.
12. Grant, R. M. (1996), "Prospering in Dynamically Competitive Environments: Organization Capability as Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, 7, 4, 375-387.
13. Hanssen-Bauer, J. and C. C. Snow (1996), "Responding to Hypercompetition: The Structure and Processes of a Regional Learning Network Organization," Organization Science, 7, 4, 413-427.
14. Hofstede, Geert (1980), Culture's Consequences, London: Sage Publication.
15. Kim, D. and Kogut, B. (1996), "Technological Platforms and Diversification," Organization Science, 7, 3, 283-301.
16. Liebeskind, J. P., A. L. Oliver, L. Zucker, and M. Brewer (1996), "Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms," Organization Science, 7, 4, 428-443.
17. March, J. G. (1995), "The Future, Disposable Organizations, and the Rigidities of Imagination," Organization, forthcoming.
18. McCann, J. E. and J. Selsky (1987), "Hyperturbulence and the Emergence of Type 5 Environments," Academy of Management Review, 9, 460-470.
19. Meyer, A. D., G. R. Brooks, and J. B. Goes (1990), "Environmental Jolts and Industry Revolutions: Organizational Responses to Discontinuous Change," Strategic Management Journal, 11, Summer, 93-110.
20. _, _, and _ (1993), "Organizations Reacting to Hyperturbulence," in Longitudinal Field Research Methods, ed. G. P. Huber and A. H. Van de Ven, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 299-350.
21. Morgan, G. (1983), "More on metaphor: why we cannot control tropes in administrative science," Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 601-607.
22. Nault, B. R. and M. Vandenbosch (1996), "Eating Your Own Lunch: Protection Through Preemption," Organization Science, 7, 3, 342-358.
23. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.
24. Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel (1990), "The Core Competence of the Corporation," Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91.
25. Richardson, J. (1996), "Vertical Integration and Rapid Response in Fashion Apparel," Organization Science, 7, 4, 400-412.
26. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Smith, A. D. and C. Zeithaml (1996), "Garbage Cans and Advancing Hypercompetition: The Creation and Exploitation of New Capabilities and Strategic Flexibility in Two Regional Bell Operating Companies," Organization Science, 7, 4, 388-399.
28. Starbuck, W. H. (1983), "Organizations as Action Generators," American Sociological Review, 48, 91-102.
29. Taylor, A. (1995), "Boeing: Sleepy in Seattle," Fortune, August 7, 92-99.
30. Thomas, L. G. (1996), "The Two Faces of Competition," Organization Science, 7, 3, 221-242.
31. Thompson, J. D. (1967), Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Victor, B. and C. Stephens (1994), "The Dark Side of the New Organizational Forms: An Editorial Essay," Organization Science, 5, 4, 479-482.
33. Volberda, H. W. (1996), "Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments," Organization Science, 7, 4, 359-374.
34. Young, G., K. G. Smith, and C. M. Grimm (1996), "'Austrian' and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-Level Competitive Activity and Performance," Organization Science, 7, 3, 243-254.
35. Zohar, A. and G. Morgan (1996), "Refining Our Understanding of Hypercompetition and Hyperturbulence," Organization Science, 7, 4, 460-464.