Single cell analysis reveals the stochastic phase of reprogramming to pluripotency is an ordered probabilistic process

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Chung, Kyung Min ^a   Kolling, Frederick W ^a   Gajdosik, Matthew D ^a   Burger, Steven ^a   Russell, Alexander C ^b   Nelson, Craig E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b University of Connecticut   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EPIGENETICS; FIBROBLAST; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84899735641     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095304     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Yamanaka S (2012) Induced pluripotent stem cells: past, present, and future. Cell stem cell 10: 678-684. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/22704507. Accessed 17 July 2012.
2. Hochedlinger K, Plath K (2009) Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development (Cambridge, England) 136: 509-523. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=2685952&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 16 July 2012.
3. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126: 663-676. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. Accessed 13 July 2012. (Pubitemid 44233629)
4. Ghosh Z, Wilson KD, Wu Y, Hu S, Quertermous T, et al. (2010) Persistent donor cell gene expression among human induced pluripotent stem cells contributes to differences with human embryonic stem cells. PloS one 5: e8975. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid= 2813859&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 18 December 2012.
5. Chin MH, Mason MJ, Xie W, Volinia S, Singer M, et al. (2009) Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell stem cell 5: 111-123. Available: http://www.cell. com/cell-stem-cell/fulltext/S1934-5909(09)00292-6. Accessed 27 October 2012.
6. Marchetto MCN, Yeo GW, Kainohana O, Marsala M, Gage FH, et al. (2009) Transcriptional signature and memory retention of human-induced pluripotent stem cells. PloS one 4: e7076. Available: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0007076. Accessed 18 December 2012.
7. Hu B-Y, Weick JP, Yu J, Ma L-X, Zhang X-Q, et al. (2010) Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 4335-4340. Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/9/4335.full. Accessed 18 December 2012.
8. Narsinh KH, Sun N, Sanchez-freire V, Lee AS, Almeida P, et al. (2011) Brief report Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Gene Expression 121: 1217-1221. doi:10.1172/JCI44635DS1.
9. Mayshar Y, Ben-David U, Lavon N, Biancotti J-C, Yakir B, et al. (2010) Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell stem cell 7: 521-531. Available: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20887957. Accessed 23 November 2012.
10. Taapken SM, Nisler BS, Newton MA, Sampsell-Barron TL, Leonhard KA, et al. (2011) Karotypic abnormalities in human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. Nature biotechnology 29: 313-314. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21478842. Accessed 19 December 2012.
11. Laurent LC, Ulitsky I, Slavin I, Tran H, Schork A, et al. (2011) Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell stem cell 8: 106-118. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.003. Accessed 19 December 2012.
12. Kim J, Chu J, Shen X, Wang J, Orkin SH (2008) An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 132: 1049-1061. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18358816. Accessed 17 July 2011. (Pubitemid 351381745)
13. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, et al. (2007) Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448: 553-560. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17603471. (Pubitemid 47206934)
14. Koche RP, Smith ZD, Adli M, Gu H, Ku M, et al. (2011) Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. Cell stem cell 8: 96-105. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.001. Accessed 8 May 2013.
15. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, Utikal J, Eminli S, et al. (2007) Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell stem cell 1: 55-70. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.stem.2007.05.014. Accessed 18 July 2012.
16. Smith ZD, Nachman I, Regev A, Meissner A (2010) Dynamic single-cell imaging of direct reprogramming reveals an early specifying event. Nature biotechnology 28: 521-526. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ articlerender.fcgi?artid=2908494&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 17 July 2011.
17. Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Golipour A, David L, Sung H-K, Beyer TA, et al. (2010) Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell stem cell 7: 64-77. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20621051. Accessed 19 July 2011.
18. Buganim Y, Faddah DA, Jaenisch R (2013) Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming. Nature reviews Genetics 14: 427-439. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23681063. Accessed 21 May 2013.
19. Golipour A, David L, Liu Y, Jayakumaran G, Hirsch CL, et al. (2012) A Late Transition in Somatic Cell Reprogramming Requires Regulators Distinct from the Pluripotency Network. Cell Stem Cell 11: 769-782. Available: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.008. Accessed 18 December 2012.
20. Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG, Lengner CJ, Wernig M, et al. (2008) Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell stem cell 2: 151-159. Available: http://www. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=2276627&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 6 July 2011. (Pubitemid 351168714)
21. Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault DT, Hochedlinger K (2008) Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell stem cell 2: 230-240. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 18371448. Accessed 23 June 2011.
22. Hanna J, Saha K, Pando B, van Zon J, Lengner CJ, et al. (2009) Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462: 595-601. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=2789972&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 17 July 2011.
23. Polo JM, Anderssen E, Walsh RM, Schwarz BA, Nefzger CM, et al. (2012) A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 151: 1617-1632. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23260147. Accessed 21 May 2013.
24. Gurdon JB (1999) Genetic reprogramming following nuclear transplantation in Amphibia. Seminars in cell & developmental biology 10: 239-243. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/scdb.1998.0284. Accessed 18 December 2012. (Pubitemid 129502415)
25. Rideout WM, Eggan K, Jaenisch R (2001) Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. Science (New York, NY) 293: 1093-1098. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/293/5532/1093.abstract. Accessed 1 November 2012. (Pubitemid 32758082)
26. Soufi A, Donahue G, Zaret KS (2012) Facilitators and Impediments of the Pluripotency Reprogramming Factors Initial Engagement with the Genome. Cell. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.045. Accessed 18 December 2012.
27. Mattout A, Biran A, Meshorer E (2011) Global epigenetic changes during somatic cell reprogramming to iPS cells. Journal of molecular cell biology 3: 341-350. Available: http://jmcb.oxfordjournals.org/content/3/6/341.full. Accessed 31 October 2012.
28. Gibson JD, Jakuba CM, Boucher N, Holbrook KA, Carter MG, et al. (2009) Single-cell transcript analysis of human embryonic stem cells. Integrative biology: quantitative biosciences from nano to macro 1: 540-551. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20023769. Accessed 27 November 2012.
29. Lowry WE, Richter L, Yachechko R, Pyle AD, Tchieu J, et al. (2008) Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 2883-2888. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi? artid=2268554&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. (Pubitemid 351723638)
30. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131: 861-872. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 18035408. Accessed 18 July 2011. (Pubitemid 350138099)
31. Tanabe K, Nakamura M, Narita M, Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2013) Maturation, not initiation, is the major roadblock during reprogramming toward pluripotency from human fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 12172-12179. Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/06/27/1310291110.abstract. Accessed 28 September 2013.
32. Rinn JL, Bondre C, Gladstone HB, Brown PO, Chang HY (2006) Anatomic demarcation by positional variation in fibroblast gene expression programs. PLoS genetics 2: e119. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=1523235&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 22 June 2011.
33. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, et al. (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science (New York, NY) 318: 1917-1920. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/18029452. Accessed 13 July 2012.
34. Boyer LA, Lee TI, Cole MF, Johnstone SE, Levine SS, et al. (2005) Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122: 947-956. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=3006442&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 16 July 2011. (Pubitemid 41345211)
35. Ramalho-Santos M, Yoon S, Matsuzaki Y, Mulligan RC, Melton DA (2002) "Stemness": transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science (New York, NY) 298: 597-600. doi:10.1126/science.1072530. (Pubitemid 35215313)
36. Young RA (2011) Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144: 940-954. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=3099475&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 10 June 2011.
37. Chan EM, Ratanasirintrawoot S, Park I-H, Manos PD, Loh Y-H, et al. (2009) Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells. Nature biotechnology 27: 1033-1037. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1580. Accessed 17 July 2011.
38. Mikkelsen TS, Hanna J, Zhang X, Ku M, Wernig M, et al. (2008) Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454: 49-55. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid= 2754827&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 18 July 2011. (Pubitemid 351931978)
39. Egli D, Birkhoff G, Eggan K (2008) Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 9: 505-516. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18568039. Accessed 27 July 2012. (Pubitemid 351890351)
40. Plath K, Lowry WE (2011) Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Nature reviews Genetics 12: 253-265. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21415849. Accessed 18 July 2011.
41. Hemberger M, Dean W, Reik W (2009) Epigenetic dynamics of stem cells and cell lineage commitment: digging Waddington's canal. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 10: 526-537. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 19603040. Accessed 19 July 2011.
42. Orkin SH, Hochedlinger K (2011) Chromatin connections to pluripotency and cellular reprogramming. Cell 145: 835-850. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/21663790. Accessed 18 July 2012.
43. Buganim Y, Faddah DA, Cheng AW, Itskovich E, Markoulaki S, et al. (2012) Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase. Cell 150: 1209-1222. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22980981. Accessed 17 September 2012.
44. Yamanaka S (2009) Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation. Nature 460: 49-52. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/19571877. Accessed 16 July 2012.
45. Rahl PB, Lin CY, Seila AC, Flynn RA, McCuine S, et al. (2010) c-Myc Regulates Transcriptional Pause Release. Cell 141: 432-445. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867410003181.
46. Singh AM, Dalton S (2009) The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell stem cell 5: 141-149. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=2909475&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 7 August 2012.
47. Park I-H, Zhao R, West JA, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, et al. (2008) Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451: 141-146. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18157115. Accessed 12 July 2012.
48. Singh AM, Chappell J, Trost R, Lin L, Wang T, et al. (2013) Cell-cycle control of developmentally regulated transcription factors accounts for heterogeneity in human pluripotent cells. Stem cell reports 1: 532-544. Available: http://www.cell.com/stem-cell-reports/fulltext/S2213-6711(13)00121-5. Accessed 24 February 2014.
49. Neganova I, Zhang X, Atkinson S, Lako M (2009) Expression and functional analysis of G1 to S regulatory components reveals an important role for CDK2 in cell cycle regulation in human embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 28: 20-30. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.358. Accessed 23 January 2014.
50. Flöttmann M, Scharp T, Klipp E (2012) A stochastic model of epigenetic dynamics in somatic cell reprogramming. Frontiers in physiology 3: 216. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=3384084&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 1 November 2012.
51. Nishino K, Toyoda M, Yamazaki-Inoue M, Fukawatase Y, Chikazawa E, et al. (2011) DNA methylation dynamics in human induced pluripotent stem cells over time. PLoS genetics 7: e1002085. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih. gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3102737&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 26 October 2012.
52. Hanna J, Carey BW, Jaenisch R (2008) Reprogramming of somatic cell identity. Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology 73: 147-155. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19022760.
53. Onder TT, Kara N, Cherry A, Sinha AU, Zhu N, et al. (2012) Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature 483: 598-602. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10953. Accessed 5 October 2012.
54. Shi Y, Desponts C, Do JT, Hahm HS, Schöler HR, et al. (2008) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. Cell stem cell 3: 568-574. Available: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.10.004. Accessed 31 October 2012.
55. Li Y, Zhang Q, Yin X, Yang W, Du Y, et al. (2011) Generation of iPSCs from mouse fibroblasts with a single gene, Oct4, and small molecules. Cell research 21: 196-204. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender. fcgi?artid=3193405&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 20 December 2012.
56. Huangfu D, Maehr R, Guo W, Eijkelenboom A, Snitow M, et al. (2008) Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nature biotechnology 26: 795-797. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18568017. Accessed 26 October 2012. (Pubitemid 351961456)
57. Shi Y, Do JT, Desponts C, Hahm HS, Schöler HR, et al. (2008) A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell stem cell 2: 525-528. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.011. (Pubitemid 351729222)
58. Zhao Y, Yin X, Qin H, Zhu F, Liu H, et al. (2008) Two supporting factors greatly improve the efficiency of human iPSC generation. Cell stem cell 3: 475-479. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18983962. Accessed 19 November 2012.
59. Li W, Ding S (2010) Small molecules that modulate embryonic stem cell fate and somatic cell reprogramming. Trends in pharmacological sciences 31: 36-45. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2009.10.002.
60. Dowell KG, Simons AK, Wang ZZ, Yun K, Hibbs MA (2013) Cell-type-specific predictive network yields novel insights into mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and cell fate. PloS one 8: e56810. Available: http://dx.plos.org/ 10. 1371/journal.pone.0056810. Accessed 17 September 2013.
61. Yang KE, Kwon J, Rhim J-H, Choi JS, Kim S II, et al. (2011) Differential expression of extracellular matrix proteins in senescent and young human fibroblasts: a comparative proteomics and microarray study. Molecules and cells 32: 99-106. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21573704. Accessed 7 August 2012.
62. SAS Institute, Cary N JMP, Version 10.