Validation in Reading Comprehension

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 361-366

  Singer, Murray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

comprehension; inference; language; memory; validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884692785     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721413495236     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Albrecht J. E.,Myers J. L.Role of context in accessing distant information during reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995;21:1459-1468.
2. Bargh J. A.Handbook of social cognition. 1994). The Four Horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, efficiency, intention, and control in social cognition. In WyerR.Jr.SrullT. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Wyer R.Srull T., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994:1-40.
3. Barton S. B.,Sanford A. J.A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment.Memory & Cognition. 1993;21:477-487.
4. Burkhardt P.Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Brain & Language. 2006;98:159-168.
5. Carpenter P. A.,Just M. A.Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychological Review. 1975;82:45-73.
6. Cohen G.Language comprehension in old age.Cognitive Psychology. 1979;11:412-429.
7. Cook A. E.,Myers J. L.Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge.Journal of Memory and Language. 2004;50:268-288.
8. Daneman M.,Carpenter P. A.Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1980;19:450-466.
9. Ferguson M. J.,Zayas V.Automatic evaluation.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009;18:362-366.
10. Ferreira F.,Bailey K. G. B.,Ferraro V.Good-enough representations in language comprehension.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2002;11:11-15.
11. Ferretti T. R.,Singer M.,Harwood J.Processes of discourse integration: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Discourse Processes. 2013;50:165-186.
12. Ferretti T. R.,Singer M.,Patterson C.Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas.Cognition. 2008;108:881-888.
13. Glenberg A. M.,Wilkinson A. C.,Epstein W.The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension.Memory & Cognition. 1982;10:597-602.
14. Hannon B.,Daneman M.Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account.Discourse Processes. 2004;37:187-204.
15. Isberner M.-B.,Richter T.Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension.Acta Psychologica. 2013;142:15-22.
16. Just M. A.,Carpenter P. A.A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review. 1980;87:329-354.
17. Kintsch W.The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review. 1988;95:163-182.
18. Knoeferle P.,Urbach T. P.,Kutas M.Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence processing: Insights from ERPs and picture-sentence verification.Psychophysiology. 2011;48:495-506.
19. Matsuki K.,Chow T.,Hare M.,Elman J. L.,Scheepers C.,McRae K.Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2011;37:913-934.
20. Mitroff S. R.,Simons D. J.,Levin D. T.Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information.Perception & Psychophysics. 2004;66:1268-1281.
21. Nieuwland M. S.,Kuperberg G. R.When the truth is not too hard to handle.Psychological Science. 2008;19:1213-1218.
22. Noordman G. M.,Vonk W.,Kempff H. J.Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts.Journal of Memory and Language. 1992;31:573-590.
23. O'Brien E. J.,Albrecht J. E.Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1992;18:777-784.
24. Discourse Processes. O'Brien E. J.Lorch R. F.Myers J. L., ed. 1998:.
25. O'Brien E. J.,Rizzella M. L.,Albrecht J. E.,Halleran J. G.Updating a situational model: A memory based text processing review.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1998;24:1200-1210.
26. Rapp D. N.,Kendeou P.Noticing and revising discrepancies as texts unfold.Discourse Processes. 2009;46:1-24.
27. Rayner K.,Warren T.,Juhasz B. J.,Liversedge S. P.The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004;30:1290-1301.
28. Rinck M.,Hahnel A.,Becker B.Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2001;27:67-80.
29. Sanford A. J.,Garrod S.The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension.Discourse Processes. 1998;26:159-190.
30. Sanford A. J.,Graesser A. C.Shallow processing and under specifications.Discourse Processes. 2006;42:99-108.
31. Schroeder S.,Richter T.,Hoever I.Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation.Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59:237-255.
32. Schroyens W. J.,Schaeken W.,d'Ydevalle G.The processing of negations in conditional reasoning: A meta-analytic case study in mental model and/or mental logic theory.Thinking & Reasoning. 2001;7:121-172.
33. Singer M.Verification of text ideas during reading.Journal of Memory and Language. 2006;54:574-591.
34. Singer M.,Halldorson M.Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences.Cognitive Psychology. 1996;30:1-38.
35. Singer M.,Halldorson M.,Lear J. C.,Andrusiak P.Validation of causal bridging inferences.Journal of Memory and Language. 1992;31:507-524.
36. Singer M.,Harkness D.,Stewart S. T.Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension.Discourse Processes. 1997;24:199-228.
37. Singer M.,Ritchot K.Individual differences in inference validation.Memory & Cognition. 1996;24:733-743.
38. Smallwood J.,McSpadden M.,Schooler J. W.When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind.Memory & Cognition. 2008;36:1144-1150.
39. Staub A.,Rayner K.,Pollatsek A.,Hyona J.,Majewski H.The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: Evidence from noun-noun compounds.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2007;33:1162-1169.
40. Tulving E.Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; 1983:.
41. van Berkum J. J. A.,Zwisterlood P.,Hagoort P.,Brown C. M.When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect.Cognitive Brain Research. 2003;17:701-718.
42. van Dijk T. A.,Kintsch W.Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1983:.
43. Wyer R. S.,Radvansky G. A.The comprehension and validation of social information.Psychological Review. 1999;106:89-118.