Characterization and selection of optimal parameters to achieve the best tribological performance of the electrodeposited Cr nanocomposite coating

Materials and Design

Volumn 54, Issue , 2014, Pages 382-389

  Yousefpour, M ^a   Rahimi, A ^a  

^a SEMNAN UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Chromium coating; Corrosion resistant; Electrodeposition; Materials selection; Nanocomposites

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; CHROMATE COATINGS; CHROMIUM; CORROSION RESISTANCE; ELECTRODEPOSITION; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; NANOCOMPOSITES; PARTICLE SIZE; TRIBOLOGY;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); CHROMIUM COATINGS; COEFFICIENT OF FRICTIONS; CORROSION-RESISTANT; MATERIALS SELECTION; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS; TRIBOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; WEAR AND CORROSION RESISTANCE;

ALUMINUM COATINGS;

EID: 84883752110     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 3 nanocomposite coatings from trivalent chromium bath. Int Heat Treat Surface Eng 2012, 6:4.
2. 4. Corros Sci 2006, 48:460-471.
3. Vaezi M.R., Sadrnezhaad S.K., Nikzad L. Electrodeposition of Ni-SiC nano-composite coatings and evaluation of wear and corrosion resistance and electroplating characteristics. Colloids Surf 2008, 315:176-182.
4. Ataee-Esfahani H., Vaezi M.R., Nikzad L., Yazdani B., Sadrnezhaad S.K. Influence of SiC nanoparticles and saccharin on the structure and properties of electrodeposited Ni-Fe/SiC nanocomposite coatings. J Alloy Compd 2009, 484:540-544.
5. Szczygieł B., Kołodziej M. Composite Ni/Al2O3 coatings and their corrosion resistance. Electrochim Acta 2005, 50:4188-4195.
6. 2 on electrodeposition and properties of chromium coating. Surf Coat Technol 2001, 137:230-234.
7. 3 composite coatings. Surface Technol 1982, 16:227-234.
8. Berçot P., Peña-Muñoz E., Pagetti J. Electrolytic composite Ni-PTFE coatings: an adaptation of Guglielmi's model for the phenomena of incorporation. Surf Coat Technol 2002, 157:282-289.
9. 2 on corrosion behaviour of chromium coatings. Corros Sci 2008, 50:338-344.
10. Ashby M.F., Bréchet Y.J.M., Cebon D., Salvo L. Selection strategies for materials and processes. Mater Des 2004, 25:51-67.
11. Chiner M. Planning of expert systems for materials selection. Mater Des 1988, 9:195-203.
12. Chatterjee P., Athawale V.M., Chakraborty S. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater Des 2009, 30:4043-4053.
13. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
14. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications 1981, Springer-Verlag, New York.
15. Wang J.-W., Cheng C.-H., Huang K.-C. Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 2009, 9:377-386.
16. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 1965, 8:338-353.
17. Yue Z. A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS. Appl Math Model 2011, 35:1926-1936.
18. Lee A.H.I., Chen W.-C., Chang C.-J. A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 2008, 34:96-107.
19. Albayrak E., Erensal Y.C. Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance. An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. J Intell Manuf 2004, 15:491-503.
20. Daǧdeviren M., Yavuz S., Kilinç N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36:8143-8151.
21. Perez-Vega S., Peter S., Salmeron-Ochoa I., Nieva-de la Hidalga A., Sharratt P.N. Analytical hierarchy processes (AHP) for the selection of solvents in early stages of pharmaceutical process development. Process Saf Environ Prot 2011, 89:261-267.
22. Khorshidi R., Hassani A., Honarbakhsh Rauof A., Emamy M. Selection of an optimal refinement condition to achieve maximum tensile properties of Al-15%Mg2Si composite based on TOPSIS method. Mater Des 2013, 46:442-450.
23. Dalalah D., AL-Oqla F., Hayajneh M. Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of cranes. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng 2010, 4.
24. Abhang L.B., Hameedullah M. Selection of lubricant using combined multiple attribute decision-making method. Adv Prod Eng Manage 2012, 1:39-50.
25. Shih H-S, Lin WY, Lee ES. Group decision making for TOPSIS. In: Joint 9th IFSA world congress and 20th NAFIPS international conference, 25-28 July. Vancouver, Canada. 2001. p. 2712-17.
26. Zeng Z., Zhang J. Electrodeposition and tribological behavior of amorphous chromium-alumina composite coatings. Surf Coat Technol 2008, 202:2725-2730.
27. Celis J.R.P., Buelens C. A mathematical model for the electrolytic codeposition of particles with a metallic matrix. J Electrochem Soc 1987, 134:1402-1408.
28. Bahrololoom M.E., Sani R. The influence of pulse plating parameters on the hardness and wear resistance of nickel-alumina composite coatings. Surf Coat Technol 2005, 192:154-163.
29. Shi L., Sun C., Gao P., Zhou F., Liu W. Mechanical properties and wear and corrosion resistance of electrodeposited Ni-Co/SiC nanocomposite coating. Appl Surf Sci 2006, 252:3591-3599.
30. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.-H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 2004, 156:445-455.