SO-PLS as an exploratory tool for path modelling

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 36, Issue , 2014, Pages 122-134

  Menichelli, Elena ^a   Almøy, Trygve ^b   Tomic, Oliver ^c   Olsen, Nina Veflen ^d   Næs, Tormod ^d,e  

^a TELENOR RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN KNOWLEDGE CENTRE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES   (Norway)

^d NOFIMA   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Multi block; Orthogonalisation; Path modelling; Regression; SO PLS

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899538311     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Asioli D., Næs T., Granli B.S., Almli V.L. Consumer preferences for iced coffee determined by conjoint analysis: An exploratory study with Norwegian consumers. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2014, (in press).
2. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables 1989, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
3. Bornkessl S., Bröring S., Omta S.W.F., van Trijp H. What determines ingredient awareness of consumers? A study on ten functional food ingredients. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 32:330-339.
4. Costa-Font M., Gil J.M. Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: A cross country study. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20(6):399-409.
5. Endrizzi I., Menichelli E., Johansen S.B., Olsen N.V., Næs T. Handling of individual differences in rating-based conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:241-254.
6. Hsu S.-H., Chen W.-H., Hsieh M.-J. Robustness testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for measuring customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 2006, 17(3):355-371.
7. Jöreskog K.G. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika 1978, 43:443-477.
8. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the Program and Applications, Chicago.
9. Jørgensen K., Segtnan V., Thyholt K., Næs T. A comparison of methods for analysing regression models with both spectral and designed variables. Journal of Chemometrics 2004, 18:451-464.
10. Kaplan D. Structural equations modelling 2000, Sage Publications, London.
11. Langsrud Ø., Næs T. Optimised score plot by Principal Components of Prediction. Chemolab 2003, 68:61-74.
12. Martens, M., Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., & Martens, H. (2007). The use of partial least squares methods in new food product development. In H. MacFie (Ed.), Consumer - led Food Product Development, (pp. 492-523). Cambridge.
13. Menichelli E., Hersleth M., Almøy T., Naes T. Alternative methods for combining information about products, consumers and consumers' acceptance based on path modelling. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 31:142-155.
14. Måge I., Mevik B.H., Næs T. Regression models with process variables and parallel blocks of raw material measurements. Journal of Chemometrics 2008, 22(7-8):443-456.
15. Næs T., Lengard V., Johansen S.B., Hersleth M. Alternative methods for combining design variables and consumer preference with information about attitudes and demographics in conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(4):368-378.
16. Næs T., Tomic O., Mevik B.H., Martens H. Path modelling by sequential PLS regression. Journal of Chemometrics 2011, 25(1):28-40.
17. Næs T., Måge I., Segtnan V.H. Incorporating interactions in multi-block SO-PLS regression. Journal of Chemometrics 2011, 25:601-609.
18. Næs T., Tomic O., Afseth N.K., Segtnan V., Måge I. Multi-block regression based on combinations of orthogonalisation, PLS-regression and canonical correlation analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2013, 124:32-42.
19. Olsen N.V., Menichelli E., Grunert K.G., Sonne A.M., Szabó E., Bánáti D., et al. Choice probability for apple juice based on novel processing techniques: Investigating the choice relevance of mean-end-chains. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(1):48-59.
20. Pliner P., Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 1992, 19(2):105-120.
21. Rubio N., Oubina J., Villasenor N. Brand awareness - Brand quality inference and consumer's risk perception in store brands of food products. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 32:289-298.
22. Tenenhaus M., Pagès J., Ambroisine L., Guinot C. PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:315-325.
23. Tenenhaus M., Vinzi V.E., Chatelin Y., Lauro C. PLS path modelling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2005, 48:159-205.
24. Vinzi, V. E. (2009). A joint partial least squares component-based approach to structural equation modelling and multi-block data analysis. In PLS'09-6th International conference on partial least squares and related methods. BeiHang University, Beijing, China.
25. Vinzi V.E., Russolillo G. Partial least squares algorithms and methods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2013, 5(1):1-19.
26. Vinzi V.E., Trinchera L., Amato S. PLS path modelling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. Handbook of partial least squares 2010, 47-82. Springer, Berlin. V.E. Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.).
27. Wold, H. (1982). Soft modelling: the basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under Indirect Observation, vol. Part 2 (pp. 1-54). North Holland, Amsterdam.