CT Angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: Results from the determination of fractional flow reserve by anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 202, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 989-994

  Leipsic, Jonathon ^a   Yang, Tae Hyun ^a   Thompson, Angus ^a   Koo, Bo Kwon ^b   John Mancini, G B ^c   Taylor, Carolyn ^a   Budoff, Matthew J ^d   Park, Hyung Bok ^e   Berman, Daniel S ^e   Min, James K ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Coronary CT angiography; Fractional flow reserve

Indexed keywords

GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; IODIXANOL; IOHEXOL; IOPAMIDOL;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART MOVEMENT; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; META ANALYSIS; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84899533929     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11441     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS. The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography: a process in evolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:957-965
2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:1724-1732
3. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012; 308:1237-1245
4. Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3:190-204
5. Jacobs JE, Boxt LM, Desjardins B, et al. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT). J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3:677-685
6. Decramer I, Vanhoenacker PK, Sarno G et al. Effects of sublingual nitroglycerin on coronary lumen diameter and number of visualized septal branches on 64-MDCT angiography. AJR 2008; 190:219-225
7. Zeiher AM, Schächinger V, Minners J. Long-term cigarette smoking impairs endothelium-dependent coronary arterial vasodilator function. Circulation 1995; 92:1094-1100
8. Min JK, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5:301-309
9. Shrimpton PC. Assessment of patient dose in CT. In Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. www.msct.eu/PDF-FILES/Appendix%20paediatric%20CT%20Dosimetry.pdf. March 2004. Accessed January 20, 2014
10. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3:122-136
11. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15:827-832 (Pubitemid 20101575)
12. Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A, et al. Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012; 6:191-199
13. Naidu SS, Rao SV, Blankenship J, et al. Clinical expert consensus statement on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 80:456-464
14. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:213-224
15. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:2233-2241
16. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:1989-1997
17. Chun EJ, Lee W, Choi YH, et al. Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocar-diogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32:86-92 (Pubitemid 351317324)
18. Feldman RL, Pepine CJ, Curry RC Jr, et al. Coronary arterial responses to graded doses of nitroglycerin. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43:91-97 (Pubitemid 9108993)
19. Chinnaiyan KM, Peyser P, Goraya TY, et al. Impact of a continuous quality improvement initiative on appropriate use of coronary CT angiography: results from a multicenter, statewide registry, the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:1185-1191