Evolution and classification of myosins, a paneukaryotic whole-genome approach

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 290-305

  Sebé Pedrós, Arnau ^a,b   Grau Bové, Xavier ^a   Richards, Thomas A ^c,d   Ruiz Trillo, Iñaki ^a,b,e  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^e INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chitin synthase; Eukaryote evolution; Holozoa; LECA; Origin of eukaryotes; Smad

Indexed keywords

MYOSIN;

ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; EUKARYOTE; GENETICS; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; EUKARYOTA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; MYOSINS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 84899486794     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu013     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adl SM, et al. 2012. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J Cell Biol. 59: 429-493.
2. Andersson JO. 2005. Lateral gene transfer in eukaryotes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 62: 1182-1197.
3. Andersson JO. 2011. Evolution of patchily distributed proteins shared between eukaryotes and prokaryotes: Dictyostelium as a case study. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 20: 83-95.
4. Andersson JO, Sjögren AM, Davis LAM, Embley TM, Roger AJ. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses of diplomonad genes reveal frequent lateral gene transfers affecting eukaryotes. Curr Biol. 13: 94-104.
5. Berg JS, Powell BC, Cheney RE. 2001. Amillennial myosin census.Mol Biol Cell. 12: 780-794.
6. Bloemink MJ, Geeves MA. 2011. Shaking themyosin family tree: biochemical kinetics defines four types of myosin motor. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 22: 961-967.
7. Bohil AB, Robertson BW, Cheney RE. 2006. Myosin-X is amolecular motor that functions in filopodia formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103: 12411.
8. Breshears LM, Wessels D, Soll DR, Titus MA. 2010. An unconventional myosin required for cell polarization and chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107: 6918-6923.
9. Burki F, Okamoto N, Pombert J-F, Keeling PJ. 2012. The evolutionary history of haptophytes and cryptophytes: phylogenomic evidence for separate origins. Proc Biol Sci. 279: 2246-2254.
10. Cheney RE, Riley MA, Mooseker MS. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of the myosin superfamily. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 24: 215-223.
11. Clark K, Langeslag M, Figdor CG, van Leeuwen FN. 2007. Myosin II and mechanotransduction: a balancing act. Trends Cell Biol. 17: 178-186.
12. Cohen O, Gophna U, Pupko T. 2011. The complexity hypothesis revisited: connectivity rather than function constitutes a barrier to horizontal gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 1481-1489.
13. Derelle R, Lang BF. 2012. Rooting the eukaryotic tree with mitochondrial and bacterial proteins. Mol Biol Evol. 29: 1277-1289.
14. Dunn CW, et al. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745-749.
15. Dutilh BE, et al. 2007. Assessment of phylogenomic and orthology approaches for phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 23: 815-824.
16. East DA, Mulvihill DP. 2011. Regulation and function of the fission yeast myosins. J Cell Sci. 124: 1383-1390.
17. Foth BJ, Goedecke MC, Soldati D. 2006. New insights into myosin evolution and classification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103: 3681-3686.
18. Fritz-Laylin LK, et al. 2010. The genome of Naegleria gruberi illuminates early eukaryotic versatility. Cell 140: 631-642.
19. Gabaldón T, Koonin EV. 2013. Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology. Nat Rev Genet. 14: 360-366.
20. Goodson HV, Spudich JA. 1993. Molecular evolution of the myosin family: relationships derived from comparisons of amino acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 90: 659-663.
21. Grau-Bové X, Sebé-Pedrós A, Ruiz-Trillo I. 2013. A genomic survey of HECT ubiquitin ligases in eukaryotes reveals independent expansions of the HECT system in several lineages. Genome Biol Evol. 5: 833-847.
22. Hampl V, et al. 2009. Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic "supergroups". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106: 3859-3864.
23. Hartman MA, Finan D, Sivaramakrishnan S, Spudich JA. 2011. Principles of unconventional myosin function and targeting. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 27: 133-155.
24. Hartman MA, Spudich JA. 2012. Themyosin superfamily at a glance. J Cell Sci. 125: 1627-1632.
25. Henn A, De La Cruz EM. 2005. Vertebrate myosin VIIb is a high duty ratio motor adapted for generating and maintaining tension. J Biol Chem. 280: 39665-39676.
26. Hodge T, Cope MJ. 2000. Amyosin family tree. J Cell Sci. 113: 3353-3354.
27. Hofmann WA, Richards Ta, de Lanerolle P. 2009. Ancient animal ancestry for nuclear myosin. J Cell Sci. 122: 636-643.
28. House CH. 2009. The tree of life viewed through the contents of genomes. In: Gogarten MB, Gogarten JP, Olendzenski LC, editors. Methods in molecular biology, Vol. 532. Berlin: Springer. p. 141-61.
29. Jain R, Rivera MC, Lake JA. 1999. Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96: 3801-3806.
30. James TY, Berbee ML. 2012. No jacket required - new fungal lineage defies dress code: recently described zoosporic fungi lack a cell wall during trophic phase. Bioessays 34: 94-102.
31. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 511-518.
32. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 3059-3066.
33. Koonin EV. 2005. Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 39: 309-338.
34. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. 2009. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25: 2286-2288.
35. Laurin-Lemay S, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2012. Origin of land plants revisited in the light of sequence contamination and missing data. Curr Biol. 22:R593-R594.
36. Le SQ, Gascuel O. 2008. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 25: 1307-1320.
37. Leonard G, Richards TA. 2012. Genome-scale comparative analysis of gene fusions, gene fissions, and the fungal tree of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109: 21402-21407.
38. Li J-F, Nebenführ A. 2008. The tail that wags the dog: the globular tail domain defines the function of myosin V/XI. Traffic 116: 290-298.
39. Liu BA, et al. 2011. The SH2 domain-containing proteins in 21 species establish the provenance and scope of phosphotyrosine signaling in eukaryotes. Sci Signal. 4:ra83.
40. Liu R, et al. 2008. Sisyphus, the Drosophila myosin XV homolog, traffics within filopodia transporting key sensory and adhesion cargos. Development 135: 53-63.
41. Loubéry S, Coudrier E. 2008. Myosins in the secretory pathway: tethers or transporters? Cell Mol Life Sci. 65: 2790-2800.
42. Manning G, Young SL, Miller WT, Zhai Y. 2008. The protist, Monosiga brevicollis, has a tyrosine kinase signaling network more elaborate and diverse than found in any known metazoan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105: 9674-9679.
43. Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldón T. 2010. Acquisition of prokaryotic genes by fungal genomes. Trends Genet. 26: 5-8.
44. Martin W, Hoffmeister M, Rotte C, Henze K. 2001. An overview of endosymbiotic models for the origins of eukaryotes, their ATP-producing organelles (mitochondria and hydrogenosomes), and their heterotrophic lifestyle. Biol Chem. 382: 1521-1539.
45. Massagué J, Seoane J, Wotton D. 2005. Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev. 19: 2783-2810.
46. Matsumura F. 2005. Regulation of myosin II during cytokinesis in higher eukaryotes. Trends Cell Biol. 15: 371-377.
47. Odronitz F, Kollmar M. 2007. Drawing the tree of eukaryotic life based on the analysis of 2,269 manually annotated myosins from 328 species. Genome Biol. 8:R196.
48. Peckham M. 2011. Coiled coils and SAH domains in cytoskeletal molecular motors. Biochem Soc Trans. 39: 1142-1148.
49. Peremyslov VV, et al. 2011. Expression, splicing, and evolution of the myosin gene family in plants. Plant Physiol. 155: 1191-1204.
50. Peyretaillade E, et al. 2011. Extreme reduction and compaction of microsporidian genomes. Res Microbiol. 162: 598-606.
51. Pomberta J-F, et al. 2012. Gain and loss of multiple functionally related, horizontally transferred genes in the reduced genomes of two microsporidian parasites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109: 12638-12643.
52. Punta M, et al. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D290-D301.
53. Richards TA, Cavalier-Smith T. 2005. Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotes. Nature 436: 1113-1118.
54. Richards TA, et al. 2011. Horizontal gene transfer facilitated the evolution of plant parasitic mechanisms in the oomycetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108: 15258-15263.
55. Roberts R, et al. 2004. Myosin VI: cellular functions and motor properties. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 359: 1931-1944.
56. Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, et al. 2007. Toward resolving the eukaryotic tree: the phylogenetic positions of jakobids and cercozoans. Curr Biol. 17: 1420-1425.
57. Roger AJ, Simpson AGB. 2009. Evolution: revisiting the root of the eukaryote tree. Curr Biol. 19:R165-R167.
58. Sebé-Pedrós A, de Mendoza A, Lang BF, Degnan BM, Ruiz-Trillo I. 2011. Unexpected repertoire of metazoan transcription factors in the unicellular holozoan Capsaspora owczarzaki. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 1241-1254.
59. Shadwick JDL, Ruiz-Trillo I. 2012. A genomic survey shows that the haloarchaeal type tyrosyl tRNA synthetase is not a synapomorphy of opisthokonts. Eur J Protistol. 48: 89-93.
60. Sierra R, et al. 2013. Deep relationships of Rhizaria revealed by phylogenomics: a farewell to Haeckel's Radiolaria. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 67: 53-59.
61. Sjölander K, Datta RS, Shen Y, Shoffner GM. 2011. Ortholog identification in the presence of domain architecture rearrangement. Brief Bioinform. 12: 413-422.
62. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
63. Stechmann A, Cavalier-Smith T. 2002. Rooting the eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion. Science 297: 89-91.
64. Steinmetz PRH, et al. 2012. Independent evolution of striated muscles in cnidarians and bilaterians. Nature 487: 231-234.
65. Suga H, et al. 2012. Genomic survey of premetazoans shows deep conservation of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases and multiple radiations of receptor tyrosine kinases. Sci Signal. 5:ra35-ra35.
66. Sweeney HL, Houdusse A. 2010. Myosin VI rewrites the rules for myosin motors. Cell 141: 573-582.
67. Syamaladevi DP, Spudich JA, Sowdhamini R. 2012. Structural and functional insights on the Myosin superfamily. Bioinform Biol Insights. 6: 11-21.
68. Thompson RF, Langford GM. 2002. Myosin superfamily evolutionary history. Anat Rec. 268: 276-289.
69. Torruella G, et al. 2012. Phylogenetic relationshipswithin the opisthokonta based on phylogenomic analyses of conserved single-copy protein domains. Mol Biol Evol. 29: 531-544.
70. Vale RD. 2003. The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport. Cell 112: 467-480.
71. Wickstead B, Gull K. 2007. Dyneins across eukaryotes: a comparative genomic analysis. Traffic 8: 1708-1721.
72. Wickstead B, Gull K, Richards TA. 2010. Patterns of kinesin evolution reveal a complex ancestral eukaryote with a multifunctional cytoskeleton. BMC Evol Biol. 10: 110.
73. Wideman AJG, Gawryluk RMR, Gray MW, Dacks JB. 2013. The ancient and widespread nature of the ER-mitochondria encounter structure. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 2044-2049.
74. Williams SA, Gavin RH. 2005. Myosin genes in Tetrahymena. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 61: 237-243.
75. Wolf YI, Koonin E V. 2013. Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution. Bioessays 35: 829-837.
76. Wolf YI, Snir S, Koonin E V. 2013. Stability along with extreme variability in core genome evolution. Genome Biol Evol. 5: 1393-1402.
77. Zhang H, et al. 2004. Myosin-X provides a motor-based link between integrins and the cytoskeleton. Nat Cell Biol. 6: 523-531.
78. Zmasek CM, Godzik A. 2011. Strong functional patterns in the evolution of eukaryotic genomes revealed by the reconstruction of ancestral protein domain repertoires. Genome Biol. 12:R4.
79. Zmasek CM, Godzik A. 2012. This Déjà vu feeling - analysis of multidomain protein evolution in eukaryotic genomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 8: e1002701.