Analyzing the Multidirectional Relationships Between the President, News Media, and the Public: Who Affects Whom?

Political Communication

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 259-281

  Lee, Han Soo ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

news media; public opinion; the president

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899459032     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2013.815295     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Akaike, H. (1973, September). Information theory and the extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Paper presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Budapest, Hungary.
2. Ansolabehere, S., Behr, R., & Iyengar, S. (1993). The media game: American politics in the television age. New York, NY: Macmillan.
3. Arnold, R. D. (2004). Congress, the press, and political accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bailey, M. A. (2007). Comparable preference estimates across time and institutions for the court, Congress, and presidency. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 433-438.
5. Barnhurst, K. G., & Mutz, D. C. (1997). American journalism and the decline in event-centered reporting. Journal of Communication, 47, 27-53.
6. Bartels, L. M. (1996, April). Politicians and the press: Who leads, who follows? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
7. Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103-125.
8. Blood, D. J., & Phillips, P. (1995. Recession headline news, consumer sentiment, the state of the economy and presidential popularity: A time series analysis 1989-1993. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 2-22.
9. Brown, J. D., Bybee, C., Wearden, S., & Straughan, D. (1987). Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 45-54.
10. Buchanan, B. I. (2001). Mediated electoral democracy: Campaigns, incentives, and reform. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 362-379). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Canes-Wrone, B. (2006). Who leads whom?: Presidents, policy, and the public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Canes-Wrone, B., & Shotts, K. W. (2004). The conditional nature of presidential responsiveness to public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 690-706.
13. Carter, D. (1959). The fourth branch of government. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
14. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101, 637-655.
15. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Cohen, J. E. (1995). Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 87-107.
17. Cohen, J. E. (1999). Presidential responsiveness and public policy-making: The publics and the policies that presidents choose. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Cohen, J. E. (2010). Going local: Presidential leadership in the post-broadcast age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19. Conference Board. (2001). Business cycle indicators handbook. New York, NY: Author.
20. Cook, T. E. (2005). Governing with the news (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Dalton, R. J., Beck, P., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flow in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 92, 111-126.
22. De Boef, S., & Kellstedt, P. M. (2004). The political (and economic) origins of consumer confidence. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 633-649.
23. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.
24. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
25. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
26. Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
27. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671-686.
28. Druckman, J. N., & Holmes, J. (2004). Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 755-778.
29. Durr, R. H. (1993). What moves policy sentiment? American Political Science Review, 87, 158-170.
30. Edwards, G. C., III. (2003). On deaf ears: The limits of the bully pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Edwards, G. C., III, & Wayne, S. (1985). Presidential leadership: Politics and policy making. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
32. Edwards, G. C., III, & Wood, B. D. (1999). Who influences whom?: The president, Congress, and the media. American Political Science Review, 93, 327-344.
33. Enders, W. (2004). Applied econometric time series (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34. Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Eshbaugh-Soha, M., & Peake, J. (2006). The contemporary presidency: 'Going local' to reform social security. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 689-704.
36. Eshbaugh-Soha, M., & Peake, J. (2011). Breaking through the noise: Presidential leadership, public opinion, and the news media. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
37. Freeman, J. R., Williams, J., & Lin, T. (1989). Vector autoregression and the study of politics. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 842-877.
38. Gans, H. J. (2004). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time (2nd ed.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
39. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78, 35-71.
40. Graber, D. (2010). Mass media and American politics (8th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
41. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral models. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
42. Grossman, M. B., & Kumar, M. J. (1981). Portraying the president: The White House and the news media. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that's fit to sell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political Communication, 27, 141-157.
45. Hill, K. Q. (1998). The policy agendas of the president and the mass public: A research validation and extension. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1328-1334.
46. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don't pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Johnstone, J., Slawski, E., & Bowman, W. (1976). The news people. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
49. Kahn, K. F., and Kenney, P. J. (2002). The slant of the news: How editorial endorsements influence campaign coverage and citizens' views of candidates. American Political Science Review, 96, 381-394.
50. Kellstedt, P. M. (2003). The mass media and the dynamics of American racial attitudes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Kernell, S. (2006). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
52. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis, an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
54. Lee, H. S. (2013). Do national economic and political conditions affect ideological media slant? Political Communication, 30, 395-418.
55. Lowry, D. T., Nio, T., & Leitner, D. W. (2003). Setting the public fear agenda: A longitudinal analysis of network TV crime reporting, public perceptions of crime, and FBI crime statistics. Journal of Communication, 53, 61-73.
56. Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
57. Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). 'Mediatization' of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16, 247-261.
58. McCarty, N. M., & Poole, K. T. (1995). Veto power and legislation: An empirical analysis of executive and legislative bargaining from 1961 to 1986. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 282-312.
59. McManus, J. H. (1994). Market driven journalism: Let the citizens beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315.
61. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.
62. Mondak, J. J. (1993). Source cues and policy approval: The cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 186-212.
63. Mutz, D. C. (1992). Mass media and the depoliticization of personal experience. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 483-508.
64. Neustadt, R. E. (1990. Presidential power and the modern presidents: The politics of leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York, NY: Free Press.
65. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1985). Presidential leadership through public opinion. In G. C. Edwards III, S. Y. Shull, & N. C. Thomas (Eds.), The presidency and public policy making (pp. 22-36). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
66. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
67. Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y., & Dempsey, G. R. (1987). What moves public opinion? American Political Science Review, 81, 23-44.
68. Patterson, T. E. (2008). Political roles of the journalist. In D. A. Graber, D. McQuail, & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news: The news of politics (pp. 23-39). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
69. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 228-278.
70. Rottinghaus, B. (2009). Strategic leaders: Determining successful presidential opinion leadership. Political Communication, 26, 296-316.
71. Schudson, M. (2007). The concept of politics in contemporary U.S. journalism. Political Communication, 24, 131-142.
72. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). London, England: Longman.
73. Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
74. Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters and officials: The organization and politics of newsmaking. Lexington, MA: Heath.
75. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48, 1-48.
76. Sims, C. A. (1988). Bayesian skepticism on unit root econometrics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 463-474.
77. Sims, C. A., & Zha, T. (1999). Error bands for impulse responses. Econometrica, 67, 1113-1156.
78. Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 264-285.
79. Sparrow, B. H. (1999). Uncertain guardians: The news media as a political institution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
80. Sparrow, B. H. (2006). A research agenda for an institutional media. Political Communication, 23, 145-157.
81. Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swing (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
82. Stimson, J. A., MacKuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 543-565.
83. Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 228-246.
84. Tulis, J. K. (1987). The rhetorical presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
85. Underwood, D. (1993). When MBAs rule the newsroom. How the marketers and managers are reshaping today's media. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
86. Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media's political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41, 814-836.
87. Weaver, D. H., Beam, R., Brownlee, B., Voakes, P., & Wilhoit, G. C. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. people at the dawn of a new millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 981-1000.
89. Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication, 23, 333-354.
90. Wood, B. D. (2009). The myth of presidential representation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
91. Wood, B. D., & Lee, H. S. (2009). Explaining the president's issue based liberalism: Pandering, partisanship, or pragmatism. Journal of Politics, 71, 1577-1592.
92. Wood, B. D., & Peake, J. S. (1998). The dynamics of foreign policy agenda setting. American Political Science Review, 92, 173-184.
93. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
94. Zarefsky, D. (2004). Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 607-619.
95. Zupan, M. A. (1992). Measuring the ideological preferences of U.S. presidents: A proposed (extremely simple) method. Public Choice, 73, 351-361.