An integrated quality function deployment and capital budgeting methodology for occupational safety and health as a systems thinking approach: The case of the construction industry

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 68, Issue , 2014, Pages 42-56

  Bas, Esra ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

0 1 Knapsack model; Accident cost; Construction; Injury severity score; Quality function deployment

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; CONSTRUCTION; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; HAZARDS; INVESTMENTS; SYSTEM THEORY;

ACCIDENT COSTS; CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS; INJURY SEVERITY; INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY; KNAPSACK MODEL; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH; PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTS (QFD);

QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

0-1 KNAPSACK MODEL; ACCIDENT COST; ARTICLE; BUDGET; BUILDING INDUSTRY; CONSTRUCTION; ECONOMICS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; SAFETY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

0-1 KNAPSACK MODEL; ACCIDENT COST; CONSTRUCTION; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL; BUDGETS; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; QUALITY CONTROL; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 84899437975     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. H. Abdul-Rahman, C.L. Kwan, and P.C. Woods Quality function deployment in construction design: application in low-cost housing design Int. J. Quality Reliability Manag. 16 6 1999 591 605
2. B.O. Alli Fundamental Principles of Occupational Health and Safety second ed. 2008 International Labor Office Geneva
3. R.L. Armacost, P.J. Componation, M.A. Mullens, and W.W. Swart An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: an industrialized housing application IIE Trans. 26 4 1994 72 79
4. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011a. Injuries, Illnesses and Fatalities, Case and Demographic Characteristics for Work-related Injuries and Illnesses Involving Days Away from Work. Available from http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew. htm.
5. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011b. Injuries, illnesses and fatalities, case and demographic characteristics for work-related injuries and illnesses involving days away from work, Supplemental Tables, Table R64. Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work by event or exposure leading to injury or illness and industry sector, Available from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.htm.
6. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011c. Injuries, illnesses and fatalities, Census of fatal occupational injuries (CFOI) - current and revised Data, Fatal occupational injuries by event or exposure for all fatalities and major private industry sector, all United States, Table A-9. Fatal occupational injuries by event or exposure for all fatalities and major private industry sector. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011d. Injuries, illnesses and fatalities, case and demographic characteristics for work-related injuries and illnesses involving days away from work. Supplemental Tables, R32. Detailed event or exposure by selected parts of body affected. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.htm.
8. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011e. Injuries, illnesses and fatalities, case and demographic characteristics for work-related injuries and illnesses involving days away from work, Supplemental Tables, R31. Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work by event or exposure leading to injury or illness and selected natures of injury or illness. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.htm.
9. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011f. Injuries, illnesses and fatalities, case and demographic characteristics for work-related injuries and illnesses involving days away from work. Supplemental Tables: Table R13. Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work by nature of injury or illness and selected parts of body affected by injury or illness. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.htm.
10. M. Braglia, G. Fantoni, and M. Frosolini The house of reliability Int. J. Quality Reliability Manag. 24 4 2007 420 440
11. I. Cariaga, T. El-Diraby, and H. Osman Integrating value analysis and quality function deployment for evaluating design alternatives J. Construct. Eng. Manag. 133 10 2007 761 770
12. L.-K. Chan, and M.-L. Wu Quality function deployment: a literature review Eur. J. Operat. Res. 143 2002 463 497
13. I. Dikmen, M.T. Birgonul, and S. Kiziltas Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry Building Environ. 40 2 2005 245 255
14. N. Eldin, and V. Hikle Pilot study of quality function deployment in construction projects J. Construct. Eng. Manag. 129 3 2003 314 329
15. 2REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong Accid. Anal. Prevent. 48 2012 167 184
16. J.A. Gambatese, M. Behm, and S. Rajendran Design's role in construction accident causality and prevention: perspectives from an expert panel Saf. Sci. 46 2008 675 691
17. Y.M. Goh, H. Brown, and J. Spickett Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture Saf. Sci. 48 3 2010 302 309
18. A. Halog, F. Schultmann, and O. Rentz Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement J. Cleaner Product. 9 2001 387 394
19. C.K.H. Hon, A.P.C. Chan, and F.K.W. Wong An analysis for the causes of accidents of repair, maintenance, alteration and addition works in Hong Kong Saf. Sci. 48 2010 894 901
20. P. Huovila, and K.J. Seren Customer-oriented design methods for construction projects J. Eng. Des. 9 3 1998 225 238
21. Y.-K. Juan, Y.-H. Perng, D. Castro-Lacouture, and K.-S. Lu Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach Autom. Construct. 18 2 2009 139 144
22. C. Kahraman, T. Ertay, and G. Büyüközkan A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach Eur. J. Operat. Res. 171 2 2006 390 411
23. J.M. Kamara, and C.J. Anumba Client requirements processing for concurrent life-cycle design and construction Concurr. Eng.-Res. Appl. 8 2 2000 74 88
24. J.M. Kamara, C.J. Anumba, and N.F.O. Evbuomwan Client requirements processing in construction: a new approach using QFD J. Architect. Eng. 5 1 1999 8 15
25. J.M. Kamara, C.J. Anumba, and N.F.O. Evbuomwan Computer-based application for the processing of clients' requirements J. Comput. Civil Eng. 14 4 2000 264 271
26. E.E. Karsak Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment Comput. Ind. Eng. 47 2004 149 163
27. J.D. Koustellis, S.D. Anagnostatos, C.D. Halevidis, F.S. Karagrigoriou, A.D. Polykrati, and P.D. Bourkas Contact of heavy vehicles with overhead power lines Saf. Sci. 49 6 2011 951 955
28. R. Lambeck, and J. Eschemuller Urban Construction Project Management 2009 McGraw Hill Construction New York, Chicago, San Francisco
29. P. Larsson, S.W.A. Dekker, and C. Tingvall The need for a systems theory approach to road safety Saf. Sci. 48 9 2010 1167 1174
30. D.-E. Lee, and D. Arditi Total quality performance of design/build firms using quality function deployment J. Construct. Eng. Manag. 132 1 2006 49 57
31. N.G. Leveson Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events Saf. Sci. 49 1 2011 55 64
32. R.E. Levitt, and N.M. Samelson Construction Safety Management 1993 John Wiley&Sons, Inc. New York, Brisbane, Toronto
33. M.-C. Lin, C.-C. Wang, M.-S. Chen, and C.A. Chang Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process Comput. Ind. 59 2008 17 31
34. H.A. Linstone, and M. Turoff The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications 1975 Addison-Wesley London
35. H.-T. Liu, and Y.-L. Tsai A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry Saf. Sci. 50 2012 1067 1078
36. H. Malekly, S. Meysam Mousavi, and H. Hashemi A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design Expert Syst. Appl. 37 7 2010 4910 4920
37. J.C. Mallon, and D.E. Mulligan Quality function deployment - a system for meeting customers' needs J. Construct. Eng. Manag. 119 3 1993 516 531
38. P.S. McAdam, and G.W. Lee Formwork: A Practical Approach 1997 Taylor & Francis
39. Milli Egitim Bakanligi, 2006. İnsaat Teknolojisi KalIp Öncesi HazIrlIk. Milli Eǧitim BakanlIǧI Ders NotlarI, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
40. B.M. Moores Radiation safety management in health care - the application of quality function deployment Radiography 12 2006 291 304
41. T. Park, and K.-J. Kim Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality J. Operat. Manag. 16 1998 569 581
42. L.S. Pheng, and L. Yeap Quality function deployment in design/build projects J. Architect. Eng. 7 2 2001 30 39
43. L. Skyttner General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspective, Practice 2005 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. Singapore
44. M.A. Syed, L.P. Sang, and Z.M. Torbica Use of quality function deployment in civil engineering capital project planning J. Construct. Eng. Manag. 129 4 2003 358 368
45. Trauma.org, 2012. Injury Severity Score Available at: http://www.trauma.org/index.php/main/article/383.
46. H. Yamashina, T. Ito, and H. Kawada Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ Int. J. Product. Res. 40 5 2002 1031 1050
47. Y.Q. Yang, S.Q. Wang, M. Dulaimi, and S.P. Low A fuzzy quality function deployment system for buildable design decision-makings Automat. Construct. 12 4 2003 381 393