Mirrored feedback in chronic stroke: Recruitment and effective connectivity of ipsilesional sensorimotor networks

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 344-354

  Saleh, Soha ^a   Adamovich, Sergei V ^a,b   Tunik, Eugene ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

fMRI; mirrored feedback; motor control; virtual reality; visuomotor integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FINGER; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND FUNCTION; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; IPSILESIONAL SENSORIMOTOR NETWORK; KINEMATICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIRRORED FEEDBACK; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARESIS; PARIETAL CORTEX; POSTCENTRAL GYRUS; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; LENSES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTOR CORTEX; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; STROKE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84899437898     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968313513074     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Trompetto C, Assini A, Buccolieri A, Marchese R, Abbruzzese G. Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 ; 111: 1860-1867
2. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005 ; 128: 490-499
3. Calautti C, Naccarato M, Jones PS, et al. The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: a 3T fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2007 ; 34: 322-331
4. Rushworth MF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2006 ; 16: 1418-1430
5. Lewis JW, Van Essen DC. Mapping of architectonic subdivisions in the macaque monkey, with emphasis on parieto-occipital cortex. J Comp Neurol. 2000 ; 428: 79-111
6. Camarda R, Matelli M, Glickstein M, Rizzolatti G. [Intrinsic and extrinsic connections of the postarcuate premotor area of the monkey]. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1984 ; 60: 823-829
7. Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, Mahnken JD, Nudo RJ. Interhemispheric connections of the ventral premotor cortex in a new world primate. J Comp Neurol. 2007 ; 505: 701-715
8. Baumer T, Bock F, Koch G, et al. Magnetic stimulation of human premotor or motor cortex produces interhemispheric facilitation through distinct pathways. J Physiol. 2006 ; 572: 857-868
9. Killackey HP, Gould HJ, Cusick CG, Pons TP, Kaas JH. The relation of corpus callosum connections to architectonic fields and body surface maps in sensorimotor cortex of new and old world monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1983 ; 219: 384-419
10. Rouiller EM, Babalian A, Kazennikov O, Moret V, Yu XH, Wiesendanger M. Transcallosal connections of the distal forelimb representations of the primary and supplementary motor cortical areas in macaque monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 1994 ; 102: 227-243
11. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 ; 263: 377-386
12. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 ; 25: 223-233
13. Dohle C, Pullen J, Nakaten A, Kust J, Rietz C, Karbe H. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 209-217
14. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Behrens J, Dohle C. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 ; 3: CD008449
15. Michielsen ME, Smits M, Ribbers GM, et al. The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 ; 82: 393-398
16. Diers M, Christmann C, Koeppe C, Ruf M, Flor H. Mirrored, imagined and executed movements differentially activate sensorimotor cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain. Pain. 2010 ; 149: 296-304
17. Matthys K, Smits M, Van der Geest JN, et al. Mirror-induced visual illusion of hand movements: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 ; 90: 675-681
18. Fukumura K, Sugawara K, Tanabe S, Ushiba J, Tomita Y. Influence of mirror therapy on human motor cortex. Int J Neurosci. 2007 ; 117: 1039-1048
19. Nojima I, Mima T, Koganemaru S, Thabit MN, Fukuyama H, Kawamata T. Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback. J Neurosci. 2012 ; 32: 1293-1300
20. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2005 ; 163: 118-122
21. Funase K, Tabira T, Higashi T, Liang N, Kasai T. Increased corticospinal excitability during direct observation of self-movement and indirect observation with a mirror box. Neurosci Lett. 2007 ; 419: 108-112
22. Adamovich SV, August K, Merians A, Tunik E. A virtual reality-based system integrated with fMRI to study neural mechanisms of action observation-execution: a proof of concept study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009 ; 27: 209-223
23. Tunik E, Adamovich SV. Remapping in the ipsilesional motor cortex after VR-based training: a pilot fMRI study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009 ; 2009: 1139-1142
24. Tunik E, Saleh S, Adamovich SV. Visuomotor discordance during visually-guided hand movement in virtual reality modulates sensorimotor cortical activity in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 ; 21: 198-207
25. Kang YJ, Park HK, Kim HJ, et al. Upper extremity rehabilitation of stroke: facilitation of corticospinal excitability using virtual mirror paradigm. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 ; 9: 71
26. Perani D, Fazio F, Borghese NA, et al. Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage. 2001 ; 14: 749-758
27. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993 ; 24: 58-63
28. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, et al. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 ; 19: 194-205
29. Fluet GG, Merians AS, Qiu Q, et al. Robots integrated with virtual reality simulations for customized motor training in a person with upper extremity hemiparesis: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 ; 36: 79-86
30. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behavioural Neurology. 2000 ; 12: 191-200
31. Rorden C, Karnath HO, Bonilha L. Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 ; 19: 1081-1088
32. August K, Lewis JA, Chandar G, Merians A, Biswal B, Adamovich S. fMRI analysis of neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation in virtual reality: activating secondary motor areas. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006 ; 1: 3692-3695
33. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007 ; 38: 95-113
34. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005 ; 26: 839-851
35. Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. 2001 ; 14: 486-500
36. Andersen SM, Rapcsak SZ, Beeson PM. Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions: still a necessity?. Neuroimage. 2010 ; 53: 78-84
37. Crinion J, Ashburner J, Leff A, Brett M, Price C, Friston K. Spatial normalization of lesioned brains: performance evaluation and impact on fMRI analyses. Neuroimage. 2007 ; 37: 866-875
38. Walther M, Juenger H, Kuhnke N, et al. Motor cortex plasticity in ischemic perinatal stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI study. Pediatr Neurol. 2009 ; 41: 171-178
39. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 ; 15: 1-25
40. Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 1997 ; 6: 218-229
41. O'Reilly JX, Woolrich MW, Behrens TE, Smith SM, Johansen-Berg H. Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 ; 7: 604-609
42. McLaren DG, Ries ML, Xu G, Johnson SC. A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches. Neuroimage. 2012 ; 61: 1277-1286
43. Grefkes C, Geyer S, Schormann T, Roland P, Zilles K. Human somatosensory area 2: observer-independent cytoarchitectonic mapping, interindividual variability, and population map. Neuroimage. 2001 ; 14: 617-631
44. Geyer S, Schormann T, Mohlberg H, Zilles K. Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of human primary somatosensory cortex, part 2: spatial normalization to standard anatomical space. Neuroimage. 2000 ; 11: 684-696
45. Marshall RS, Zarahn E, Alon L, Minzer B, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW. Early imaging correlates of subsequent motor recovery after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2009 ; 65: 596-602
46. Wasaka T, Kakigi R. The effect of unpredicted visual feedback on activation in the secondary somatosensory cortex during movement execution. BMC Neurosci. 2012 ; 13: 138
47. Grefkes C, Eickhoff SB, Nowak DA, Dafotakis M, Fink GR. Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM. Neuroimage. 2008 ; 41: 1382-1394
48. Baker JT, Donoghue JP, Sanes JN. Gaze direction modulates finger movement activation patterns in human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 1999 ; 19: 10044-10052
49. Kim YH, Jang SH, Chang Y, Byun WM, Son S, Ahn SH. Bilateral primary sensori-motor cortex activation of post-stroke mirror movements: an fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2003 ; 14: 1329-1332
50. Touzalin-Chretien P, Dufour A. Motor cortex activation induced by a mirror: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. J Neurophysiol. 2008 ; 100: 19-23
51. Tominaga W, Matsubayashi J, Deguchi Y, et al. A mirror reflection of a hand modulates stimulus-induced 20-Hz activity. Neuroimage. 2009 ; 46: 500-504
52. Voisin JI, Rodrigues EC, Hetu S, et al. Modulation of the response to a somatosensory stimulation of the hand during the observation of manual actions. Exp Brain Res. 2011 ; 208: 11-19
53. Hamzei F, Lappchen CH, Glauche V, Mader I, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Functional plasticity induced by mirror training: the mirror as the element connecting both hands to one hemisphere. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 ; 26: 484-496
54. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999 ; 353: 2035-2036
55. Sathian K, Greenspan AI, Wolf SL. Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000 ; 14: 73-76
56. Sutbeyaz S, Yavuzer G, Sezer N, Koseoglu BF. Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88: 555-559
57. Moseley GL, Gallace A, Spence C. Is mirror therapy all it is cracked up to be? Current evidence and future directions. Pain. 2008 ; 138: 7-10
58. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 ; 89: 393-398
59. Ezendam D, Bongers RM, Jannink MJ. Systematic review of the effectiveness of mirror therapy in upper extremity function. Disabil Rehabil. 2009 ; 31: 2135-2149
60. Bogdanov S, Smith J, Frey SH. Former hand territory activity increases after amputation during intact hand movements, but is unaffected by illusory visual feedback. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 ; 26: 604-615