Teacher knowledge for teaching with technology: A TPACK lens

Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-15

  Niess, Margaret L ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899287456     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.
2. Angeli, C. M., & Valanides, N. (2009, April). Examining epistemological and methodological issues of the conceptualizations, development and assessment of ICT-TPACK: Advancing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) - Part I: Teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
3. Bearison, J. D., & Dorval, B. (2002). Collaborative cognition. Westport, CT: Ablex.
4. Borko, H., & Putnam, T. (1996). Learning to teach. In Berliner, D. C., & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
5. Borko, H., Stecher, B., & Kuffner, K. (2007). Using artifacts to characterize reform-oriented instruction: The Scoop Notebook and rating guide. (Technical Report 707). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED495853)
6. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15.
7. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-163. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_6
8. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-190. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_3
9. Dawson, K. (2007). The role of teacher inquiry in helping prospective teachers untangle the complexities of technology use in classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24, 5-14.
10. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., & Scharber, C. (2009, April). Using the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge framework in professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA.
11. Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. Science & Technology Education Library, 6, 3-17. doi:10.1007/0-306-47217-1_1
12. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.), Educational design research. London, UK: Routledge.
13. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In Berliner, D. C., & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
14. Grimmett, P., & MacKinnon, A. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and education of teachers. In Grant, G. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 385-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15. Grossman, P. L. (1989). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 24-31. doi:10.1177/002248718904000504
16. Grossman, P. L. (1991). Overcoming the apprenticeship of observation in teacher education coursework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 245-257. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(91)90004-9
17. Groth, R., Spickler, D., Bergner, J., & Bardzell, M. (2009). A qualitative approach to assessing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4). Retrieved May 16, 2010, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss4/mathematics/article1.cfm
18. Harrington, R. A. (2008). The development of preservice teachers' technology specific pedagogy. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 69(3). (UMI No. AAT 3308570)
19. Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3833-3840). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
20. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2009, March). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA
21. Hillstrom, K., & Hillstrom, L. C. (2005). The industrial revolution in America. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
22. Hughes, J. E., & Scharber, C. M. (2008). Leveraging the development of English TPCK within the deictic nature of literacy. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 87-106), New York, NY: Routledge.
23. International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene, OR: ISTE.
24. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-30), New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Lee, K., Suharwoto, G., Niess, M., & Sadri, P. (2006). Guiding inservice mathematics teachers in developing TPCK (Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge). In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 3750-3765). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
26. Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2004). The nature and sharing of teacher knowledge of technology in a student teachers/mentor teacher pair. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 421-437. doi:10.1177/0022487104269858
27. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting students' ability to reason about data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 103-109. doi:10.1023/A:1013874514650
28. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
29. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., Wolf, L. G., & DeSchryver, M. (2010, March). Developing TPACK by design. In J. Voogt (Chair), Developing TPACK. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE), San Diego, CA.
30. Mouza, C., & Wong, W. (2009). Studying classroom practice: Case development for professional learning in technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17, 175-202. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from http://www.editlib.org/p/26963
31. Niess, M. (2008a). Mathematics teachers developing Technology, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK). In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 5297-5304). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
32. Niess, M. L. (2001). A model for integrating technology in preservice science and mathematics content-specific teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 102-109. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18011.x
33. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
34. Niess, M. L. (2008b). Knowledge needed for teaching with technologies - Call it TPACK. AMTE Connections, Spring, 9-10.
35. Niess, M. L., Lee, J. K., & Kajder, S. B. (2008). Guiding learning with technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., & Johnston, C., Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/mathematics/article1.cfm
37. Niess, M. L., Suharwoto, G., Lee, K., & Sadri, P. (2006, April). Guiding inservice mathematics teachers in developing TPCK. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.
38. Parkay, F. W., & Stanford, B. H. (2009). Becoming a teacher (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
39. Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practices as function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413-429.
40. Pierson, M. E. (2008). Teacher candidates reflect together on their own development of TPCK: Edited teaching videos as data for inquiry. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5305-5309). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
41. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Horizon, 9, 1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
42. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15. doi:10.2307/1176586
43. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
44. Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2009). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
45. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
46. Santrock, J. W. (2006). Educational psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
47. Shavelson, R., Ruiz-Primo, A., Li, M., & Ayala, C. (2003, August). Evaluating new approaches to assessing learning (CSE Report 604). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation.
48. Shreiter, B., & Ammon, P. (1989, April). Teachers' thinking and their use of reading contracts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
49. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
50. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
51. Thompson, A. D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24, 38, 64.
52. uit Beijerse, R. P. (2000). Questions in knowledge management: Defining and conceptualizing a phenomenon. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 94-109.
53. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In Calderhead, J. (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). London, UK: Cassell.
54. Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational psychology: Active learning edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
55. Zhao, Y. (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.