Epistemic uncertainty in the ranking and categorization of probabilistic safety assessment model elements: Issues and findings

Risk Analysis

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 983-1001

  Borgonovo, Emanuele ^a  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Epistemic uncertainty; Importance measures; Probabilistic safety assessment

Indexed keywords

INTERSECTIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PEELING; PROBABILITY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CASE STUDIES; EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES; EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY; EXPECTED VALUES; IMPORTANCE MEASURES; MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES; MODEL PARAMETERS; NRC REGULATORY GUIDE; PARAMETER VALUES; PRIORITIZATION; PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; MODELING; PROBABILITY; SAFETY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

KNOWLEDGE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROBABILITY; SAFETY; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 48349112807     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01064.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Apostolakis, G. E. (1990). The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. Science, 250, 1359 1364.
2. Apostolakis, G. E. (1995). A commentary on model uncertainty. In Proceeding of the Workshop on Model Uncertainty: Its Characterization and Quantification, College Park, MO : Center for Reliability Engineering, University of Maryland.
3. Apostolakis, G. E. (2005). How useful is quantitative risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 24 (3 515 520.
4. Apostolakis, G. E., & Kaplan, S. (1981). Pitfalls in risk calculations. Reliability Engineering, 2, 135 145.
5. Birnbaum, Z. W. (1969). On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed. Multivariate Analysis-II (pp. 581 592). New York : Academic Press.
6. Borgonovo, E. (2006). Measuring uncertainty importance: Evaluation and comparison of alternative approaches. Risk Analysis, 26 (5 1349 1362.
7. Borgonovo, E. (2007). Differential, criticality and Birnbaum importance measures: An application to basic event, groups and SSCs in event trees and binary decision diagrams. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92 (10 1458 1467.
8. Borgonovo, E., & Apostolakis, G. E. (2001). A new importance measure for risk-informed decision-making. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72 (2 193 212.
9. Borgonovo, E., Apostolakis, G. E., Tarantola, S., & Saltelli, A. (2003). Comparison of local and global sensitivity analysis techniques in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79, 175 185.
10. Breeding, R. J., Helton, J. C., Gorham, E. D., & Harper, F. T. (1992). Summary description of the methods used in the probabilistic risk assessments for NUREG-1150. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 135, 1 27.
11. Brewer, H. D., & Canady, K. S. (1999). Probabilistic safety assessment support for the maintenance rule at Duke Power Company. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 63, 243 249.
12. Caruso, M. A., Cheok, M. C., Cunningham, M. A., Holahan, G. M., King, T. L., Parry, G. W., Ramey-Smith, A. M., Rubin, M. P., & Thadani, A. C. (1999). An approach for using risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant-specific changes to the licensing basis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 63, 231 242.
13. Cheok, M. C., Parry, G. W., & Sherry, R. R. (1998). Use of importance measures in risk-informed regulatory applications. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 60, 213 226.
14. Eide, S. A., Khericha, S. T., & Thatcher, T. A. (1991). Advanced Test Reactor Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Vol. I. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, EGG-PRP-8823, Revision 1, September 1991.
15. Epstein, S., & Rauzy, A. (2005). Can we trust PRA Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 88, 195 205.
16. Fleming, K. N. (1996). Developing useful insights and avoiding misleading conclusions from risk importance measures in PSA applications. In Proceeding PSA '96. Park City, Utah, September 29-October 3, 1996. La Grange Park, Illinois : American Nuclear Society.
17. Frey, C. H., & Patil, S. R. (2002). Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Analysis, 22 (3 553 571.
18. Helton, J. C. (1994). Treatment of uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems. Risk Analysis, 14, 483 511.
19. Helton, J. C. (1997). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 57, 3 76.
20. Helton, J. C., Anderson, D. R., Jow, H.-N., Marietta, M. G., & Basabilvazo, G. (1999). Performance assessment in support of the 1996 compliance certification application for the waste isolation pilot plant. Risk Analysis, 19, 959 986.
21. Helton, J. C., & Breeding, R. J. (1993). Calculation of reactor accident safety goals. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 39, 129 158.
22. Helton, J. C., & Davis, F. J. (2002). Illustration of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Risk Analysis, 22 (3 591 622.
23. Helton, J. C., Johnson, J. D., Sallaberry, C. J., & Storlie, C. B. (2006). Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 1175 1209.
24. Hoffman, F. O., & Hammonds, J. S. (1994). Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: The need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Analysis, 14, 707 712.
25. Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1 (1 11 27.
26. Lambert, H. E. (1975a). Fault Trees for Decision Making in Systems Analysis. UCRL-51829.
27. Lambert, H. E. (1975b). Measures of importance of events, reliability and fault tree analysis. In R. E. Barlow, J. B. Fussell, & N. D. Singpurwalla (Eds. Reliability and Fault Tree Analysis (pp. 77 100). Philadelphia : SIAM.
28. Marshall, F. M., Rasmuson, D. M., & Mosleh, A. (1998). Common-Cause Failure Parameter Estimations. US NRC, NUREG/CR-5497, INEEL/EXT-97-01328.
29. Martz, H. F., & Waller, R. A. (1991). Bayesian Reliability Analysis, 2nd ed. Malabar (FL) USA : John Wiley&Sons, Krieger Publishing.
30. Modarres, M., & Agarwal, M. (1996). Consideration of probabilistic uncertainty in risk-based importance measures. In Proceeding PSA '96. Park City, Utah, September 29-October 3, 1996. La Grange Park, Illinois : American Nuclear Society.
31. NRC, Regulatory Guide 1.174 (2002). An approach for using probabilistic risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant-specific changes to the licensing basis. Revision 1, November 2002. Draft was issued as DG-1110. Available at : http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power- reactors/active/01-174/index.html.
32. Paté-Cornell, M. E. (1996). Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54, 95 111.
33. Patil, S. R., & Frey, C. H. (2004). Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods based on application to a food safety risk assessment model. Risk Analysis, 24 (3 573 585.
34. Saltelli, A. (2002). Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Analysis, 22 (3 579 590.
35. Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., & Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
36. Smith, C. L. (1998). Calculating conditional core damage probabilities for nuclear power plant operations. Reliability Engineering and System Safet, 59, 299 307.
37. Sobol' I. M. (1967). On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput. Math. Phys., 7, 86 112.
38. Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Reliability Evaluations (SAPHIRE) Version 6.0 - System Overview Manual. NUREG/CR-6532, Russell et al. authors, May 1999.
39. Vasseur, D., & Llory, M. (1999). International survey on PRA figures of merit. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 66, 261 274.
40. Vesely, W. E. (1998). Reservations on ASME risk-based in-service inspection and testing: An outlook to the future. Risk Analysis, 18, 423 425.