Posterior predictive bayesian phylogenetic model selection

Systematic Biology

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 309-321

  Lewis, Paul O ^a   Xie, Wangang ^b   Chen, Ming Hui ^a   Fan, Yu ^c   Kuo, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b ABBVIE INC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GREEN ALGA; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

ANGIOSPERMS; CHLOROPHYTA; CLASSIFICATION; DNA, PLANT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84898997868     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syt068     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19:716-723.
2. Arima S., Tardella L. 2012. Improved harmonic mean estimator for phylogenetic model evidence. J. Comput. Biol. 19:418-438.
3. Baele G., Lemey P., Bedford T., Rambaut A., Suchard M.A., Alekseyenko A.V. 2012. Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:2157-2167.
4. Bergthorsson U., Adams K.L., Thomason B., Palmer J.D. 2003. Widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes in flowering plants. Nature 424:197-201.
5. Bollback J. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1171-1180.
6. Bollback J.P. 2005. Posterior mapping and predictive distributions. In: Nielsen R., editor. Statistical methods in molecular evolution. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 439-462.
7. Brown J.M., ElDabaje R. 2009. PuMA: Bayesian analysis of partitioned (and unpartitioned) model adequacy. Bioinformatics 25:537-538.
8. Brown J.M., Hedtke S.M., Lemmon A.R., Lemmon E.M. 2010. When trees grow too long: Investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch-length estimates. Syst. Biol. 59:145-161.
9. Chen M.-H., Dey D., Ibrahim J. 2004. Bayesian criterion based model assessment for categorical data. Biometrika 91:45-63.
10. Chen M.-H., Shao Q.-M., Ibrahim J.G., editors. 2000. Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation. New York: Springer.
11. Cummins C.A., McInerney J.O. 2011. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases. Syst. Biol. 60:833-844.
12. Fan Y., Wu R., Chen M.-H., Kuo L., Lewis P.O. 2011. Choosing among partition models in Bayesian phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:523-532.
13. Foster P.G. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53:485-495.
14. Friel N., Pettitt A.N. 2008. Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 70:589-607.
15. Geisser S. 1980. In discussion of G. E. P. Box paper entitled: Sampling and Bayes' inference in scientific modelling and robustness. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 143:416-417.
16. Gelfand A.E., Dey D.K., Chang H. 1992. Model determination using predictive distributions with implementation via sampling-based methods (with discussion). Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Tech. Rep., Stanford, California, 462.
17. Gelfand A.E., Ghosh S. 1998. Model choice: A minimum posterior predictive loss approach. Biometrika 85:1-11.
18. Guindon, S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307-321.
19. Huelsenbeck J.P., Larget B., Alfaro M.E. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1123-1133.
20. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F., Nielsen R., Bollback J.P. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
21. Ibrahim J., Chen M., Sinha D. 2001. Criterion-based methods for Bayesian model assessment. Stat. Sinica 11:419-443.
22. Jukes T.H., Cantor C.R. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H.N., editor., Mammalian protein metabolism.NewYork:Academic Press. pp. 21-132.
23. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
24. Lartillot N., Lepage T., Blanquart S. 2009. PhyloBayes 3: A Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25:2286-2288.
25. Lartillot N., Phillippe H. 2006. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Syst. Biol. 55:195-207.
26. Lepage T., Bryant D., Philippe H., Lartillot N. 2007. A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2669-2680.
27. Marshall D.C. 2010. Cryptic failure of partitioned Bayesian phylogenetic analyses: Lost in the land of long trees. Syst. Biol. 59:108-117.
28. Newton M.A., Raftery A.E. 1994. Approximate Bayesian inference with theweighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion). J.Roy. Stat. Soc. B 56:3-48.
29. Nylander J.A.A. 2008. MrModeltest v2.3. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Distributed by the author.
30. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1253-1256.
31. Posada D., Crandall K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
32. Rambaut A., Grassly N.C. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
33. Rannala B., Zhu T., Yang Z. 2011. Tail paradox, partial identifiability, and influential priors in Bayesian branch length inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:325-335.
34. Ripplinger J., Sullivan J. 2010. Assessment of substitution model adequacy using frequentist and Bayesian methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:2790-2803.
35. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., Van Der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., S. Hohna, Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61:539-542.
36. Schwarz G.E. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6:461-464.
37. Shannon C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. AT&T Tech. J. 27:379-423, 623-656.
38. Suchard M., Weiss R., Sinsheimer J. 2001. Bayesian selection of continuous-Time Markov chain evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1001-1013.
39. Sullivan J., Joyce P. 2005. Model selection in phylogenetics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 36:445-466.
40. Swofford D.L. 2002. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
41. Tippery N.P., Fǔcikova K., Lewis P.O., Lewis L.A. 2012. Probing the monophyly of the directly opposite flagellar apparatus group in Chlorophyceae using data from five genes. J. Phycol. 48:1482-1493.
42. Wilks S.S. 1938. The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann. Statist. 9:60-62.
43. Xie W., Lewis P.O., Fan Y., Kuo L., Chen M.-H. 2011. Improvingmarginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Syst. Biol. 60:150-160.
44. Zwickl D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [Ph.D. thesis]. University of Texas at Austin.111.